🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 201729016 Released July 21, 2017 Approved

Invalid QSST consent and possible ineligible owners receive inadvertent relief

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2017, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2017
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A corporation attempted to elect S status while one shareholder was a trust intended to be a qualified subchapter S trust. The trustee signed both the QSST election and the corporation's Form 2553 consent, even though the trust beneficiary was required to sign them, making the S election ineffective. Several blocks of stock also may later have been held temporarily by ineligible shareholders before being transferred to eligible individuals and trusts. The IRS treated the ineffective election and any resulting terminations as inadvertent because the corporation consistently reported as an S corporation, the errors were not tax-motivated, and all affected parties agreed to required adjustments. Relief was conditioned on the beneficiary filing the proper S-election consent and QSST election within 120 days.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the corporation retain continuous S status despite an invalid trust consent, a missing QSST election, and possible temporary ineligible shareholders?
  • Outcome: approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(c)(2), 1361(d), 1362(a)(2), 1362(d)(2), and 1362(f)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201729016 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/21/2017 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.01-00, 1362.01-02,
1362.02-00, 1362.02-02, Person To Contact:
1362.04-00, 1362.00-00 ----------------------------,
ID No. ------------------
-------------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------------------- ----------------------
------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
------------------------- CC:PSI:B01
PLR-136391-16
Date:
March 29, 2017

LEGEND

Company = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

State = --------------

A = --------------------------------

B = ------------------------------

C = ---------------------------------------

D = --------------------------------

E = -------------------------------------

F = ---------------------------

PLR-136391-16 2

G = -----------------------------------

H = ----------------------------

J = -----------------------------

K = --------------------------------------

Trust 1 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Trust 2 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Beneficiary = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Date 1 = --------------------

Date 2 = ----------------------

Date 3 = -----------------

Date 4 = -----------------

Date 5 = -----------------

Date 6 = ----------------------

Date 7 = ---------------------------

a = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

b = --------

c = -----
PLR-136391-16 3

d = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

e = --------

f = --------

h = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

i = --------

k = -----

m = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

n = --------

o = --------

p = --------

r = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

s = ------

t = ------

u = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

v = -----

w = ------

x = ----------
PLR-136391-16 4

Dear -------------:

  This responds to a letter dated November 14, 2016, and subsequent

correspondence, submitted on behalf of Company by Company’s authorized
representative, requesting relief under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (the
Code).

FACTS

    According to the information submitted, Company was incorporated under the

laws of State on Date 1. Company attempted to elect to be treated as an S corporation
effective Date 2.

   Prior to Date 2, shares of Company were transferred to Trust 1. Company

represents that Trust 1 complies with the requirements for a qualified subchapter S trust
(QSST) under § 1361(d)(3). However, Trust 1’s QSST election was inadvertently
signed by the trustee of Trust 1, rather than by Beneficiary, the beneficiary of Trust 1.
Additionally, the trustee of Trust 1, not Beneficiary, signed the consent for Form 2553,
Election by a Small Business Corporation. As a result of the failure of Beneficiary to
sign Trust 1’s QSST election and Company’s S corporation election, Company’s S
corporation election was ineffective.

   Between Date 3 and Date 7, a shares of Company’s stock may have been

owned by an ineligible S corporation shareholder. Between Date 3 and Date 6 income
and other items attributable to the a shares were reported by A, an eligible S
corporation shareholder. Beginning Date 6 until Date 7, all income and other items from
the a shares were allocated as though H owned b shares and Trust 2 owned c shares.
On Date 7, the a shares were transferred b shares to H and c shares to Trust 2. H and
Trust 2 were both eligible S corporation shareholders.

   Also, between Date 3 and Date 7, d shares of Company’s stock may have been

owned by an ineligible S corporation shareholder. Between Date 3 and Date 6 income
and other items attributable to the d shares were reported by A. Beginning Date 6 until
Date 7, all income and other items from the d shares were allocated as though B, C, D,
E, F, G, H, J, K, and Trust 1 each owned e shares and Trust 2 owned f shares. On
Date 7, the d shares were transferred e shares to B, C, D, E, F, G, H, J, K, and Trust 1,
and f shares to Trust 2. B, C, D, E, F, G, H, J, K, Trust 1, and Trust 2 were all eligible S
corporation shareholders (other than Trust 1’s failure to properly make a QSST
election).

  Between Date 4 and Date 7, h shares of Company’s stock may have been

owned by an ineligible S corporation shareholder. Between Date 4 and Date 6 income
and other items attributable to the h shares were reported by A. Beginning Date 6 until
Date 7, all income and other items from the h shares were allocated as though H owned
PLR-136391-16 5

i shares and Trust 2 owned k shares. On Date 7, the h shares were transferred i shares
to H and k shares to Trust 2.

   Also between Date 4 and Date 7, m shares of Company’s stock may have been

owned by an ineligible S corporation shareholder. Between Date 4 and Date 6 income
and other items attributable to the m shares were reported by A. Beginning Date 6 until
Date 7, all income and other items from the m shares were allocated as though B, C, D,
E, J, K, and Trust 1 each owned n shares, F, G, and H each owned o shares, and Trust
2 owned p shares. On Date 7, the m shares were transferred n shares to B, C, D, E, J,
K, and Trust 1, o shares to F, G, and H and p shares to Trust 2.

    Between Date 5 and Date 7, r shares of Company’s stock may have been owned

by an ineligible S corporation shareholder. Between Date 5 and Date 6 income and
other items attributable to the r shares were reported by A. Beginning Date 6 until
Date 7, all income and other items from the r shares were allocated as though H owned
s shares and Trust 2 owned t shares. On Date 7, the r shares were transferred s
shares to H and t shares to Trust 2.

   Also between Date 5 and Date 7, u shares of Company’s stock may have been

owned by an ineligible S corporation shareholder. Between Date 5 and Date 6 income
and other items attributable to the u shares were reported by A. Beginning Date 6 until
Date 7, all income and other items from the u shares were allocated as though B, C, D,
E, F, G, H, J, and K each owned v shares, Trust 1 owned w shares, and Trust 2 owned
x shares. On Date 7, the u shares were transferred v shares to B, C, D, E, F, G, H, J,
and K, w shares to Trust 1, and x shares to Trust 2.

     Company represents that there was reasonable cause for the failure of the

beneficiary of Trust 1 to sign the consent form for Company’s S election and Trust 1’s
QSST election. Company further represents that these failures were inadvertent
oversights and were not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning.
Company further represents that Company has treated itself consistently with being an
S corporation since Date 2 and that the beneficiary of Trust 1 has consistently included
his distributive share of Company's income on his federal income tax returns for the
year of the invalid election and for all subsequent years as if Trust 1 had timely filed a
QSST election. Company further represents that it did not intend for its S corporation
election to terminate in connection with the transfers to the potentially ineligible
shareholders and any termination was not motivated by tax avoidance. Finally,
Company and its shareholders agree to make any adjustments required by the
Secretary consistent with the treatment of Company as an S corporation.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

   Section 1361(a)(1) provides that the term “S corporation” means, with respect to

PLR-136391-16 6

any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is
in effect for such year.

   Section 1361(b)(1) defines a “small business corporation” as a domestic

corporation that is not an ineligible corporation and that does not (A) have more than
100 shareholders, (B) have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, a trust
described in § 1361(c)(2), or an organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is not an
individual, (C) have a nonresident alien as a shareholder, and (D) have more than one
class of stock.

    Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(i) provides that a trust, all of which is treated (under

subpart E of part I of subchapter J of chapter 1) as owned by an individual who is a
citizen or resident of the United States, may be an S corporation shareholder. Section
1361(c)(2)(B)(i) provides that, in the case of a trust described in § 1361(c)(2)(A)(i), the
deemed owner shall be treated as the shareholder for purposes of § 1361(b)(1).

   Section 1361(d)(1) provides that a QSST whose beneficiary makes an election

under § 1361(d)(2) will be treated as a trust described in § 1361(c)(2)(A)(i), and the
QSST's beneficiary will be treated as the owner (for purposes of § 678(a)) of that portion
of the QSST’s S corporation stock to which the election under § 1362(d)(2) applies.

    Section 1361(d)(3) defines a QSST as a trust (A) the terms of which require that

(i) during the life of the current income beneficiary, there shall be only one income
beneficiary of the trust; (ii) any corpus distributed during the life of the current income
beneficiary may be distributed only to such beneficiary; (iii) the income interest of the
current beneficiary in the trust shall terminate on the earlier of the beneficiary’s death or
the termination of the trust; and (iv) upon the termination of the trust during the life of the
current income beneficiary, the trust shall distribute all of its assets to that beneficiary;
and (B) all of the income (with the meaning of § 643(b)) of which is distributed (or
required to be distributed) currently to one individual who is a citizen or resident of the
United States.

    Section 1362(a)(2) provides that an election under § 1362(a) shall be valid only if

all persons who are shareholders in such corporation on the day on which such election
is made consent to such election.

   Section 1.1362-6(b)(2)(iv) provides in relevant part that, in the case of a trust

described in section 1361(c)(2)(A) (including a trust treated under section 1361(d)(1)(A)
as a trust described in section 1361(c)(2)(A)(i)), only the person treated as the
shareholder for purposes of section 1361(b)(1) must consent to the election.

  Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that an election under § 1362(a) shall be

terminated whenever the corporation ceases to be a small business corporation.
PLR-136391-16 7

    Section 1362(f) provides, in relevant part, that if (1) an election under § 1362(a)

by any corporation (A) was not effective for the taxable year for which made by reason
of a failure to meet the requirements of § 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consents, or
B) was terminated under paragraph (2) or (3) of § 1362(d), (2) the Secretary determines
that the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent,
(3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances
resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, steps were taken (A) so that the
corporation is once more a small business corporation or (B) to acquire the required
shareholder consents, and (4) the corporation and each person who was a shareholder
of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees
to make any adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S
corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to the period, then,
notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, the
corporation will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation during the period
specified by the Secretary.

CONCLUSION

    Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, we

conclude that Company’s S election was ineffective because Trust 1 was an ineligible
shareholder due to the failure of Trust 1’s beneficiary to make a QSST election and to
consent on behalf of Trust 1 to Company’s S corporation election. In addition, we
conclude that the ineffectiveness was inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f). If the
election had been valid, Company’s S corporation status may have terminated on Date
3, Date 4, and Date 5 when Company stock may have been transferred to ineligible
shareholders. However, we conclude that, if Company’s S corporation election was
terminated, such a termination was inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f).
Consequently, we rule that Company will be treated as continuing to be an S
corporation from Date 2 and thereafter, provided that Company’s S corporation election
is not otherwise terminated under § 1362(d).

    A will be treated as the shareholder of the a shares from Date 3 until Date 6, at

which point H will be treated as the shareholder of b shares and Trust 2 will be treated
as the shareholder of c shares. A will be treated as the shareholder of the d shares
from Date 3 until Date 6, at which point B, C, D, E, F, G, H, J, K, and Trust 1 each will
be treated as the shareholder of e shares and Trust 2 will be treated as the shareholder
of f shares. A will be treated as the shareholder of the h shares from Date 4 until Date
6, at which point H will be treated as the shareholder of i shares and Trust 2 will be
treated as the shareholder of k shares. A will be treated as the shareholder of the m
shares from Date 4 until Date 6, at which point B, C, D, E, J, K, and Trust 1 each will be
treated as the shareholder of n shares, F, G, and H each will be treated as the
shareholder of o shares, and Trust 2 will be treated as the shareholder of p shares. A
will be treated as the shareholder of the r shares from Date 5 until Date 6, at which point
H will be treated as the shareholder of s shares and Trust 2 will be treated as the
PLR-136391-16 8

shareholder of t shares. A will be treated as the shareholder of the u shares from Date
5 until Date 6, at which point B, C, D, E, F, G, H, J, and K each will be treated as the
shareholder of v shares, Trust 1 will be treated as the shareholder of w shares, and
Trust 2 will be treated as the shareholder of x shares.

    This ruling is conditioned on Trust 1’s consent to Company’s S corporation

election, signed by Beneficiary, being filed with the appropriate service center, indicating
that the consent is to be associated with the originally filed Form 2553, within 120 days
of this letter. This ruling is further conditioned on Beneficiary of Trust 1 filing a QSST
election for Trust 1 with the appropriate service center, effective Date 2, within 120 days
of the date of this letter. A copy of this letter should be attached to the consent and to
the QSST election. This letter ruling will be null and void if these conditions are not
satisfied.

    Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied

concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter. Specifically, no opinion is expressed concerning whether
Company is otherwise eligible to be treated as an S corporation, or whether Trust 1 is
eligible to be treated as a QSST.

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. According to

§ 6110(k)(3), this ruling may not be used or cited as precedent.

    Pursuant to the power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of

this letter to your authorized representative.

                                      Sincerely,


                                      Laura C. Fields
                                      ________________________________
                                      Laura C. Fields
                                      Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 1
                                      Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                      (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)

Copy of this letter
Copy of this letter for § 6110 purposes

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2017, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.