Missed ESBT election causes only inadvertent S termination
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2017, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An S corporation's stock was held by a grantor trust whose deemed owner died. The trust remained an eligible shareholder for two years after the death, but it continued holding the stock after that period without making an electing small business trust election. The corporation's S election therefore terminated when the two-year window expired. The IRS found the termination inadvertent and treated the corporation as continuously maintaining S status. Relief required the trustees to file an effective ESBT election and all required returns within the specified period, and the corporation also had to make a stated adjustment payment within 45 days.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the corporation retain S status after a post-death trust failed to make a timely ESBT election?
- Outcome: approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(c)(2), 1361(e), 1362(d)(2), and 1362(f); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1361-1(m)(2) and 1.1362-4
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201728020 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/14/2017 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.04-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------------------- --------------------, ID No. ------------------
-------------------------- Telephone Number:
--------------------------------------------- ----------------------
-------------------------- Refer Reply To:
----------------------------- CC:PSI:B03
PLR-138721-16
Date:
March 22, 2017
LEGEND
X = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
Trust = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
State = ---------------
Date 1 = ------------------
Date 2 = ---------------------------
Date 3 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
H = ------------------------------------------------
$d = ----------------
Dear -----------------
This letter responds to a letter dated December 8, 2016, that was submitted on
behalf of X, requesting a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.
The information submitted states that X was incorporated in State and elected to
be an S corporation effective Date 1. Shares of stock in X were held by Trust. Trust was
PLR-138721-16 2
a grantor trust described in § 1361(c)(2)(A)(i) of which H was the deemed owner. H died
on Date 2. Trust qualified under § 1361(c)(2)(A)(ii) as an eligible shareholder for the
next two years until Date 3. However, Trust continued to hold the X stock after the two-
year period. According to X, Trust qualifies as an electing small business trust (“ESBT”),
but its trustees made no ESBT election. As a result, X’s S corporation election
terminated on Date 3.
X represents that the failure to file the ESBT election for Trust was inadvertent
and was not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. X further represents
that X and its shareholders have agreed to make such adjustments consistent with the
treatment of X as an S corporation as required by the Secretary.
Section 1362(a) provides that a small business corporation may elect to be an S
corporation.
Section 1361(b)(1)(B) provides that the term “S corporation” means, with respect
to any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a)
is in effect for such a tax year.
Section 1361(b)(1)(B) provides that for purposes of subchapter S, a “small
business corporation” cannot have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, a
trust described in § 1361(c)(2), or an organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is not
an individual.
Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(ii) provides that for purposes of § 1361(b)(1)(B), a trust
which is described in § 1361(c)(2)(A)(i) immediately before the death of the deemed
owner and which continues in existence after such death may be a shareholder, but
only for the 2-year period beginning on the day of the deemed owner’s death.
Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(v) provides that for purposes of § 1361(b)(1)(B), an ESBT
may be a shareholder.
Section 1361(e) defines an ESBT. Section 1361(e)(1)(A) provides that, except as
provided in § 1361(e)(2)(B), an ESBT means any trust if (i) such trust does not have as
a beneficiary any person other than (I) an individual, (II) an estate, (III) an organization
described in § 170(c)(2), (3), (4), or (5), or (IV) an organization described in § 170(c)(1)
which holds a contingent interest in such trust and is not a potential current beneficiary;
(ii) no interest in such trust was acquired by purchase; and (iii) an election under
§ 1361(e) applies to such trust.
Section 1361(e)(3) provides that an election under § 1361(e) shall be made by
the trustee. Any such election shall apply to the taxable year of the trust for which made
and all subsequent taxable years of such trust unless revoked with the consent of the
Secretary.
PLR-138721-16 3
Section 1.1361-1(m)(2)(i) of the Income Tax Regulations provides, in part, that
the trustee of the trust must make the ESBT election by signing and filing, with the
service center where the S corporation files its income tax return, a statement that
meets the requirements of § 1.1361-1(m)(2)(ii).
Section 1362(d)(2) provides that an election under § 1362(a) shall be terminated
whenever (at any time on or after the first day of the first taxable year for which the
corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small business
corporation.
Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any
corporation was terminated under § 1362(d)(2) or (3); (2) the Secretary determines that
the circumstances resulting in such termination were inadvertent; (3) no later than a
reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in such
termination, steps were taken so that the corporation for which the termination occurred
is a small business corporation; and (4) the corporation for which the termination
occurred, and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during
the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments (consistent
with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the
Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting
in such termination, the corporation shall be treated as an S corporation during the
period specified by the Secretary.
Section 1.1362-4(b) provides that for purposes of § 1.1362-4(a), the
determination of whether a termination was inadvertent is made by the Commissioner.
The corporation has the burden of establishing that under the relevant facts and
circumstances the Commissioner should determine that the termination was
inadvertent. The fact that the terminating event was not reasonably within the control of
the corporation and was not part of a plan to terminate the election, or the fact that the
terminating event or circumstance took place without the knowledge of the corporation,
notwithstanding its due diligence to safeguard itself against such an event or
circumstance, tends to establish that the termination was inadvertent.
Section 1.1362-4(d) provides that the Commissioner may require any
adjustments that are appropriate. In general, the adjustments should be consistent with
the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation during the period specified by the
Commissioner.
Based solely upon the facts submitted and the representations made, we
conclude that X’s S corporation election terminated on Date 3 due to the trustees’ failure
to make an ESBT election for Trust. We also conclude that the termination constituted
an inadvertent termination within the meaning of § 1362(f). We further hold that,
pursuant to the provisions of § 1362(f), X will be treated as continuing to be an S
PLR-138721-16 4
corporation from Date 3 provided X’s S corporation election was valid and was not
otherwise terminated under § 1362(d).
This ruling is contingent on the following: (1) the trustees of Trust must file, within
the sooner of 120 days following the date of this letter or the date any year will close
under § 6501(a), an ESBT election effective Date 3; and (2) trustees must file within that
same period all required returns, including amended returns, for all open years
consistent with the requested relief. If X or its shareholders fail to treat themselves as
described above, this ruling is null and void.
Furthermore, as an adjustment under § 1362(f)(4), a payment of $d and a copy
of this letter must be sent to the following address: Internal Revenue Service, Cincinnati
Service Center, 201 West Rivercenter Blvd., Covington, KY 41011, Stop 31
-----------------, Manual Deposit. This payment must be sent no later than 45 days from
the date of this letter; and if these conditions are not met, then this ruling is null and
void. In addition, if these conditions are not met, X must send notification that its S
election has terminated to the service center with which X’s S election was filed.
Except as specifically ruled upon above, no opinion is expressed concerning the
Federal tax consequences of any facts discussed or referenced in this letter, including
whether X was or is an S corporation for Federal tax purposes.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this
letter is being sent to your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
Bradford Poston
Senior Counsel, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy of this letter for section 6110 purposes
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2017, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.