Corporation receives relief for an inadvertent S election termination
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2017, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An S corporation's shares were transferred to a trust whose trustee inadvertently failed to make an electing small business trust election. Because the trust was not then an eligible S corporation shareholder, the transfer terminated the corporation's S election and threatened the qualified subchapter S subsidiary status of its wholly owned subsidiary. The IRS treated the termination as inadvertent under IRC § 1362(f), allowing the corporation to remain an S corporation and the subsidiary to remain a QSub. The relief is conditioned on filing an ESBT election effective as of the transfer date within 120 days.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Can the corporation preserve its S status after a trust shareholder failed to make a timely ESBT election?
- Outcome: Approved. The S election and QSub election remain effective if the trust files the required ESBT election within 120 days.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(b), 1361(c), 1361(e), 1362(d), 1362(f); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1361-1(m), 1.1361-3(a)
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201724021 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/16/2017 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.01-01, 1362.04-00
Person To Contact:
--------------------------- ----------------, ID No. ------------------
----------------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------
-------- Refer Reply To:
--------------------------------------- CC:PSI:B01
PLR-137040-16
Date:
March 01, 2017
LEGEND
X = -----------------------------
Y = --------------------------------------------
Trust1 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
--------------------------
Trust2 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
Trust3= --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Date 1= ------------------------
Date 2= ---------------------------
Date 3= ----------------------
PLR-137040-16 2
Date 4= ------------------------
Date 5= ---------------------------
Date 6= ----------------------
State = ---------------
Dear -----------------:
This responds to a letter dated November 17, 2016, submitted on behalf of X,
requesting relief under section 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code) for an
inadvertent termination of its S corporation election.
FACTS
According to the information submitted and representations within, X was formed and
made a valid S corporation election on Date 2, under the laws of State. Y was formed
and made a valid S corporation election on Date 1, under the laws of State. On Date 3,
X acquired all of the stock in Y. X made a valid Qualified Subchapter S Subsidiary
(QSub) election for Y effective Date 3.
At the time of X’s S corporation election, Trust1, a grantor trust, was the sole
shareholder of X. On Date 4, Trust1 transferred X shares to Trust2. Trust2 made a
valid Electing Small Business Trust (ESBT) election effective Date 4.
On Date 5, the assets of Trust2 were transferred to Trust3. Trust3 was not a valid S
corporation shareholder, thereby causing X’s S corporation election to terminate
effective Date 5. X represents that Trust3 was eligible to make an Electing Small
Business Trust (ESBT) election as of Date 5, however, the trustee of Trust5
inadvertently failed to file an ESBT election. X represents that Trust3 has been treated
as if a valid ESBT election had been made on Date 5 and has at all times since Date 5
met the requirements of an ESBT under § 1361(d)(3). X further represents that Trust3
has filed its income tax returns consistent with being an ESBT.
X represents that the circumstances resulting in the failure to make the ESBT election
was inadvertent and not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. X
further represents that X has filed its income tax returns consistent with having a valid S
election in effect for all taxable years since X elected to be an S corporation. X
represents that other than the failure to make a valid ESBT election on Date 5, X has
qualified as a small business corporation at all times since its election on Date 2.
Lastly, X and its shareholders agree to make any adjustments required as a condition of
obtaining relief under § 1362(f) that may be required by the Secretary.
PLR-137040-16 3
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 1361(a) provides that an S corporation is a small business corporation for which
an election under § 1362(a) is in effect.
Section 1361(b)(1) provides that the terms “small business corporation” means a
domestic corporation which is not an ineligible corporation and which does not (A) have
more than 100 shareholders, (B) have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate,
a trust described in § 1361(c)(2), or an organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is
not an individual, (C) have a nonresident alien as a shareholder, and (D) have more
than 1 class of stock.
Section 1361(b)(3)(A) generally provides that a QSub shall not be treated as a
separate corporation and all assets, liabilities, and items of income, deduction, and
credit of a QSub shall be treated as assets, liabilities, and such items (as the case may
be) of the S corporation.
Section 1361(b)(3)(B) defines a QSub as a domestic corporation which is not an
ineligible corporation, if 100 percent of the stock of the corporation is owned by the S
corporation, and the S corporation elects to treat the corporation as a Qualified
subchapter S subsidiary .
Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that an election under § 1362(a) shall be terminated
whenever (at any time on or after the 1st day of the 1st taxable year for which the
corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small business
corporation.
Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(i) of the Code provides that for purposes of section 1361(b)(1) a
trust all of which is treated (under subpart E of part I of subchapter J of this chapter) as
owned by an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States may be an S
corporation shareholder.
Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(v) provides that for purposes of § 1361(b)(1)(B), an ESBT is a
permissible shareholder.
Section 1361(e)(3) provides that an election under § 1361( e) shall be made by the
trustee. Any such election shall apply to the taxable year of the trust for which made and
all subsequent taxable years of such trust unless revoked with the consent of the
Secretary.
Section 1.1361-1(m)(2)(i) provides that the trustee of an ESBT must make the ESBT
election by signing and filing, with the service center where the S corporation files its
income tax return, a statement that meets the requirements of § 1.1361-1(m)(2)(ii).
PLR-137040-16 4
Section 1.1361-1(m)(2)(iii) provides that the trustee of an ESBT must file the ESBT
election within the time requirements prescribed in § 1.1361-1(j)(6)(iii) for filing a QSST
election (generally within the 16-day-and-2-month period beginning on the day that the
stock is transferred to the trust).
Section 1.1361-3(a) prescribes the time and manner for making an election to be
classified as a QSub.
Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that an election under § 1362(a) shall be terminated
whenever (at any time on or after the 1st day of the 1st taxable year for which the
corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small business
corporation.
Section 1362(f) provides, in relevant part, that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any
corporation was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined without
regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of § 1361(b); (2)
the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness or
termination were inadvertent; (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after
discovery of the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness or termination, steps
were taken so that the corporation for which the termination occurred is a small
business corporation; and (4) the corporation for which the termination occurred, and
each person who was a shareholder in such corporation at any time during the period
specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make the adjustments (consistent with the
treatment of such corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary
with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in such
ineffectiveness or termination, such corporation shall be treated as an S corporation
during the period specified by the Secretary.
CONCLUSION
Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that
the failure of Trust3 to make an ESBT election effective Date 5 caused an inadvertent
termination of X’s S corporation election within the meaning of § 1362(f) on Date 5.
Pursuant to the provisions of § 1362(f), X will be treated as continuing to be an S
corporation beginning on and after Date 2, and Y will continue to be a QSub of X
effective Date 3, unless X's S corporation election is otherwise terminated under
§ 1362(d).
This letter ruling is subject to the condition that within 120 days from the date of this
letter, an election to treat the Trust3 as an ESBT effective Date 5, must be made with
the appropriate service center. A copy of this letter should be attached to the ESBT
election. If this condition is not met, then this ruling is null and void. Furthermore, if this
condition is not met, X must send notification that its S election has terminated to the
service center with which X’s S election was filed.
PLR-137040-16 5
Except as specifically ruled upon above, we express or imply no opinion concerning the
federal tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other provision of the
Code. Specifically, we express or imply no opinion regarding X’s eligibility to be an S
corporation.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. According to § 6110(k)(3),
this ruling may not be used or cited as precedent.
Pursuant to the power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of this
letter to your authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
David R. Haglund
David R. Haglund
Branch Chief, Branch 1
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy of this letter for section 6110 purposes
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2017, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.