🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 201722012 Released June 2, 2017 Approved

Deferred intercompany stock gain is excluded after subsidiary liquidation

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2017, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2017
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A consolidated group inherited a deferred intercompany gain from an earlier sale of subsidiary stock within a predecessor group. After several ownership changes and internal contributions, the subsidiary and its corporate owners converted to limited liability companies in transactions represented to qualify as liquidations. The taxpayer represented that the buyer's basis in the sold stock disappeared in the liquidation without producing any tax benefit or successor basis. The IRS ruled that the deferred gain was excluded from gross income under Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-13(c)(6)(ii)(D). It also ruled that the excluded amount would neither enter any member's earnings and profits nor be treated as tax-exempt income under the consolidated return investment-adjustment rules.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: How should deferred gain from an earlier intercompany subsidiary-stock sale be treated when the stock basis is eliminated in a later liquidation?
  • Outcome: Approved. The gain was excluded from gross income and did not create earnings and profits or tax-exempt income.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 332(a), 337(a); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1502-13(c)(6)(ii)(D), 1.1502-32(b)(2)(ii)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201722012 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/2/2017 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1502.13-00, 1502.13-01
Person To Contact:
----------------------------- -------------------, ID No. ------------------
------------------------------------ Telephone Number:
------------------------------------------ ----------------------
----------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
----------------------------- CC:CORP:B01
PLR-128576-16
Date:
March 08, 2017

Legend

Global Parent = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------

OpCo = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------

Former Parent = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------

Sub1 = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------

Sub2 = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLR-128576-16 2

                        ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                        --------------

Sub3 = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub4 = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------

State A = --------------

Date 1 = -------------------

Date 2 = ---------------------------

Date 3 = ------------------------

Date 4 = ------------------------

Date 5 = -----------------

Date 6 = ----------------------------

Date 7 = ----------------------------

Dear -------------------:

This letter responds to your authorized representative’s letter dated September 13,
2016, requesting rulings on certain federal income tax consequences of the transaction
described below (the "Transaction"). The information provided in that request and in
subsequent correspondence is summarized below.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalties of perjury statement
executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material
submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.
PLR-128576-16 3

                                    FACTS

Global Parent is a State A corporation and the parent of a worldwide group of
corporations. Global Parent’s stock is publicly traded. Global Parent is also the
common parent of a consolidated group (within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-
1(h)) (the “Global Parent Group”).

Prior to Date 6, through an entity disregarded for federal income tax purposes, Global
Parent wholly owned OpCo. OpCo indirectly owned all the equity interests in Former
Parent. Former Parent wholly owned Sub1, Sub1 wholly owned Sub2, Sub2 wholly
owned Sub3, and Sub3 wholly owned Sub4 (Sub1 through Sub4 collectively the
“Subsidiaries”). The Subsidiaries were all domestic corporations and members of the
Global Parent Group. Sub4 was the successor to a predecessor corporation in a
reorganization that the taxpayer represents qualified under section 368(a)(1)(F) (the
“Reorganization”) on Date 5. All of the basis in such predecessor’s stock became
reflected in the basis of Sub4 stock. Any reference herein to Sub4 includes a reference
to such predecessor as the context requires.

Prior to Date 1, Former Parent was the common parent of a consolidated group (the
“Former Parent Group”). In the Former Parent Group, Former Parent wholly owned
Sub4, Sub4 wholly owned Sub1, Sub1 wholly owned Sub2, and Sub2 wholly owned
Sub3. On Date 1, Former Parent sold a portion of the stock of Sub4 to Sub3 in
exchange for a note from Sub3 (the sale the “Sub4 Sale”, and the note the “Sub3
Note”). Former Parent realized a capital gain on the Sub4 Sale (the “Intercompany
Gain”), and the Intercompany Gain was deferred under Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-13. On
Date 2, Sub4 distributed all of its interest in Sub1 to Former Parent.

On Date 3, OpCo acquired Former Parent, and as a result, the Former Parent Group
terminated. Former Parent and the Subsidiaries joined the consolidated group of which
OpCo was the common parent (the “OpCo Group”). On Date 4, Global Parent acquired
OpCo, and as a result, the OpCo Group terminated. OpCo, Former Parent, and the
Subsidiaries joined the Global Parent Group.

On Date 5, Former Parent contributed its remaining interest in Sub4 to Sub1, and then
caused Sub1 to contribute the interest in Sub4 to Sub2 and then to Sub3. As a result of
the successive contributions, Sub 3 wholly owned Sub4.

                               TRANSACTION

On Date 6 and Date 7, the following steps were completed, in the order specified below.

(i) On Date 6, Sub4 converted to a limited liability company (“LLC”) under State A
law.
PLR-128576-16 4

(ii) On Date 6, Sub3 converted to a LLC under State A law.

(iii) On Date 6, Sub2 converted to a LLC under State A law.

(iv) On Date 6, Sub1 converted to a LLC under State A law.

(v) On Date 7, Former Parent converted to a LLC under State A law.

The steps described above collectively are the “Conversions.”

                              REPRESENTATIONS

a) The Sub3 Note was repaid in full with cash, property, or a combination thereof,
and at all times prior to its repayment, the Sub3 Note was an intercompany
obligation within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-13(g)(2)(ii).

b) The Conversions each qualified for non-recognition of gain or loss under sections
332(a) and 337(a).

c) There is no plan or intention for Former Parent and the Subsidiaries to (i) convert
back to a corporation under state law, or (ii) make an election under Treas. Reg.
§ 301.7701-3 to be classified as a corporation for federal income tax purposes.

d) The effects of the Sub4 Sale have not previously been reflected on the Former
Parent Group’s, the OpCo Group’s, or the Global Parent Group’s returns.

e) Neither the Former Parent Group, the OpCo Group, nor the Global Parent Group
has derived, and no taxpayer will derive, any federal income tax benefit from the
Sub4 Sale that gave rise to the Intercompany Gain or the redetermination of the
Intercompany Gain (including adjustment to basis in member stock under Treas.
Reg. § 1.1502-32).

f) Sub3’s basis in the Sub4 stock involved in the Sub4 Sale was eliminated in the
liquidation of Sub4 without the recognition of gain or loss with respect to such
Sub4 stock, and Sub3’s basis in such Sub4 stock was not further reflected in any
successor asset within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-13(j)(1).

                                     RULINGS

Based solely on the information submitted and the representations set forth above, we
rule as follows:

  1. The Intercompany Gain is redetermined to be excluded from gross income under
    Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-13(c)(6)(ii)(D). Accordingly, the Intercompany Gain is
    PLR-128576-16 5

    excluded from Former Parent’s gross income for the Global Parent Group’s
    consolidated return year that includes the day of the Sub4 liquidation.

  2. The amount of the Intercompany Gain that is redetermined to be excluded from
    gross income will not be taken into account as earnings and profits of any
    member and will not be treated as tax-exempt income under Treas. Reg.
    § 1.1502-32(b)(2)(ii).

                                     CAVEATS
    

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax treatment of the proposed transaction under any provision of the Code and
regulations or the tax treatment of any condition existing at the time of, or effects
resulting from, the proposed transaction that is not specifically covered by the above
rulings. Specifically, we express no opinion on whether the Reorganization qualified
under section 368(a)(1)(F).

                         PROCEDURAL STATEMENTS

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that this letter may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of this
ruling letter.

Pursuant to the power of attorney on file in this matter, a copy of this letter is being sent
to your authorized representative.

                                       Sincerely,




                                       ______________________________
                                       William W. Burhop
                                       Assistant to the Branch Chief, Branch 2
                                       Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                       (Corporate)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2017, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.