School support association denied exemption

Plain-English summary

An association raised money to buy supplies and equipment for a for-profit S corporation school owned by the association's president. The school was the association's only intended recipient, several board members had ties to the school, and the purchases relieved costs the school otherwise would bear. The IRS concluded that the association had a substantial nonexempt purpose, provided substantial private benefit to the school and its owner, and allowed earnings to inure to private individuals. It also could not qualify as a section 509(a)(3) supporting organization because the supported school was not a publicly supported charity. The IRS denied section 501(c)(3) status, and the denial became final after the association did not protest.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Does an association formed to subsidize a related for-profit school qualify under section 501(c)(3) or as a supporting organization?
• Outcome: Denied. The association failed the operational test, produced private benefit and inurement, and did not support a qualifying public charity.
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 501(c)(3), 509(a)(3); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.501(c)(3)-1, 1.509(a)-4; Rev. Rul. 76-206; Better Business Bureau of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. United States, 326 U.S. 279 (1945)

Full text (IRS public release)

Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service

P.O. Box 2508
IRS Cincinnati, OH 45201

Date: February 6, 2017

Employer ID number:
Release Number: 201718039

Release Date: 5/5/2017 Contact person/ID number:
UIL Code: 501.03-30

Contact telephone number:
Form you must file:

Tax years:

Dear

This letter is our final determination that you don’t qualify for tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code (the Code). Recently, we sent you a proposed adverse determination in response to your
application. The proposed adverse determination explained the facts, law, and basis for our conclusion, and it
gave you 30 days to file a protest. Because we didn’t receive a protest within the required 30 days, the proposed
determination is now final.

Because you don’t qualify as a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code, donors can’t
deduct contributions to you under Section 170 of the Code. You must file federal income tax returns for the tax
years listed at the top of this letter using the required form (also listed at the top of this letter) within 30 days of
this letter unless you request an extension of time to file.

We’ll make this final adverse determination letter and the proposed adverse determination letter available for
public inspection (as required under Section 6110 of the Code) after deleting certain identifying information.
Please read the enclosed Notice 437, Notice of Intention to Disclose, and review the two attached letters that
show our proposed deletions. If you disagree with our proposed deletions, follow the instructions in the Notice
437 on how to notify us. If you agree with our deletions, you don’t need to take any further action.

We’ll also notify the appropriate state officials of our determination by sending them a copy of this final letter
and the proposed determination letter (under Section 6104(c) of the Code). You should contact your state
officials if you have questions about how this determination will affect your state responsibilities and
requirements.

Letter 4038 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47632S

If you have questions about this letter, you can contact the person listed at the top of this letter. If you have
questions about your federal income tax status and responsibilities, call our customer service number at
1-800-829-1040 (TTY 1-800-829-4933 for deaf or hard of hearing) or customer service for businesses at
1-800-829-4933.

Sincerely,

Jeffrey I. Cooper
Director, Exempt Organizations
Rulings and Agreements

Enclosures:

Notice 437

Redacted Letter 4036, Proposed Adverse Determination Under IRC Section 501 (c)(3)
Redacted Letter 4038, Final Adverse Determination Under IRC Section 501(c)(3) - No Protest

Letter 4038 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47632S

Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service

Cincinnati, OH 45201

Date: December 9, 2016

Employer ID number:

Contact person/ID number:

Contact telephone number:

Contact fax number:

Legend: UIL:
= 501.03-30
= 501.32-01
= 501.33-00
509.02-02
Dear

We considered your application for recognition of exemption from federal income tax under Section 501(a) of
the Internal Revenue Code (the Code). Based on the information provided, we determined that you don’t qualify
for exemption under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code. This letter explains the basis for our conclusion. Please
keep it for your records.

Issues

1) Do you meet the operational test under Treasury Regulation § 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1)? No, for the reasons
stated below.

2) Have your net earnings inured in whole or in part to the benefit of private shareholders or individuals as
stated in Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(2)? Yes, for the reasons stated below.

3) Do you meet the requirements to be a supporting organization under section 509(a)(3)(A) of the Code
and Treas. Reg. § 1.509(a)-4(b)? No, for the reasons stated below.

Facts

You were formed as an unincorporated association on date R in the state of T.

2

According to your Articles of Association, your purpose is to generate and oversee funds for increasing student
achievement, student engagement and development, which align with the mission of V. Your secondary
function is to advise the school administration in areas of policy or other administrative affairs. You state you
are charitable, religious/educational, and may make distributions under 501(c)(3) of the Code, and desire to
carry on any other purposes or acts permitted by the laws of T.

Your Articles and Bylaws state that no part of your net earnings shall inure to the benefit of, or be distributable
to, your members, officers, or other private persons, except that you shall be authorized and empowered to pay
reasonable compensation for services rendered and to make payments and distributions in furtherance of your
stated purposes.

V is a for-profit Sub-Chapter S Corporation owned by individual B.
B is your president; C is your vice president and E is your secretary.

Your Board of Directors is composed of individuals B, C, D, and E, as well as two additional members
appointed by the parents of V. Individuals C and D are parents of a former student of V. E is a non-voting
member of the board and is employed as the principal of V.

The responsibility of the Board shall include, but not be limited to, fundraising, establishing funding priorities,
approving general budgets, advising school policy and advising school personnel matters.

Revenue will come from fundraisers, grants, and individual donors. Your Board will oversee all revenues and
expenses.

V will be the only recipient of funds. Your treasurer will keep receipts, documentation, and books for all grants,
loans, or distributions to them. You will require quarterly reports on the use of funds.

You requested to be recognized as a supporting organization to V. To date, all of your expenditures have been
for supplies, equipment, and other items for the exclusive use of children attending V. You have also purchased
equipment required by the state for increased licensing requirements of V.

Law

Section 501(c)(3) of the Code provides for the recognition of exemption of organizations that are organized and
operated exclusively for religious, charitable, or other purposes as specified in the statute. No part of the net
earnings may inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual.

Section 509(a)(3)(A) of the Code describes an organization which is organized and at all times thereafter is
operated exclusively for the benefit of one or more specified organizations described in sections 509(a)(1) or
509(a)(2).

Treas. Reg. § 1.501(a)-1(c) provides that the terms “private shareholder or individual” in Section 501 of the
Code refer to persons having a personal and private interest in the activities of the organization.

Letter 4036 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47630W

3

Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1) provides that, in order to be exempt as an organization described in section
501(c)(3) of the Code, an organization must be both organized and operated exclusively for one or more of the
purposes specified in such section. If an organization fails to meet either the organizational test or the
operational test, it is not exempt.

Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1) states that an organization will be regarded as operated exclusively for one or
more exempt purposes only if it engages primarily in activities which accomplish one or more of such exempt
purposes specified in section 501(c)(3). An organization will not be so regarded if more than an insubstantial
part of its activities is not in furtherance of an exempt purpose.

Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(2) stipulates that an organization is not operated exclusively for one or more
exempt purposes if its net earnings inure in whole or in part to the benefit of private shareholders or individuals.

Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii) provides that an organization is not organized and operated exclusively for
one or more exempt purposes unless it serves a public rather than a private interest. The organization must
establish that it is not organized or operated to benefit private interests such as designated individuals or the
persons who created it.

Treas. Reg. § 1.509(a)-4(b) states in order to qualify as a supporting organization under section 509(a)(3)(A) of
the Code, an organization must be both organized and operated exclusively “for the benefit of, to perform the
functions of, or to carry out the purposes of” one or more specified publicly supported organizations. If an
organization fails to meet either the organizational test or the operational test, it cannot qualify as a supporting
organization.

Revenue Ruling 76-206, 1976-1 C.B. 154, held that a nonprofit organization formed to promote the retention of
music programs of a local for-profit radio station by seeking program sponsors, urging the public to patronize
the sponsors, and soliciting subscriptions to the station's program guide, all of which activities tended to
increase the station's revenues, did not qualify for exemption under section 501(c)(3) of the Code. The
organization's board of directors represented the community at large and did not include any representatives of
the for-profit radio station. It was held that the activities resembled a public relations campaign designed to
enable the for-profit radio station to continue broadcasting classical music. The organization's efforts enabled
the radio station to increase its total revenues. The increase in listening audience that may occur as a result of
the organization's activities would enhance the value and salability of the station's airtime. A similar
enhancement was derived through the sale of the station's program directories. Thus, the organization's
activities would benefit the for-profit radio station in more than an incidental way.

In Better Business Bureau of Washington, DC. Inc. v. United States, 326 U.S. 279 (1945), the Supreme Court
held that the presence of a single non-exempt purpose, if substantial in nature, will destroy a claim for
exemption regardless of the number or importance of truly exempt purposes. The petitioner's activities were
largely animated by non-exempt purposes directed fundamentally to ends other than that of education.

In est of Hawaii v. Commissioner, 71 T.C. 1067 (1979), several for-profit organizations exerted significant
indirect control over est of Hawaii, a nonprofit entity, through contractual arrangements. The question for the
court was not whether the payments made to the for-profits were excessive, but whether they benefited
substantially from the operation of the nonprofit. The Tax Court concluded that the for-profits were able to use
the nonprofit as an “instrument” to further their for-profit purposes. Neither the fact that the for-profits lacked

Letter 4036 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47630W

4

structural control over the organization nor the fact that amounts paid to the for-profit organizations under the
contracts were reasonable affected the court's conclusion. Consequently, est of Hawaii did not qualify as an
organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Code.

In International Postgraduate Medical Foundation v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo, 1989-36 (1989), the court
considered whether a nonprofit corporation that conducted continuing medical education tours qualified for
exemption under section 501(c)(3) of the Code. The court found that a substantial purpose of the petitioner was
benefiting the for-profit travel agency. It concluded that when a for-profit organization benefits substantially
from the manner in which the activities of a related organization are carried on, the latter organization is not
operated exclusively for exempt purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the Code, even if it
furthers other exempt purposes.

In Salvation Navy v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-275, the court found that the organization failed to meet
the operational test under Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii) because it could not prove that it was not
organized to serve the private interests of its founder. The organization conceded that it and the individual in
question were one in the same. The court found that the affairs of the organization and the individual in
question were irretrievably intertwined, and that the benefits the individual sought to obtain via a determination
letter would have inured to the individual himself.

Application of Law

Section 501(c)(3) of the Code sets forth two requirements for an organization to be recognized as exempt. An
organization must be both organized and operated exclusively for purposes described in section 501(c)(3). (See
Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1)). According to your organizing document, in addition to being a charitable,
religious and educational organization, you will also carry on any other purposes or acts permitted by the laws
of T. In addition, your organizing document limited your activities to those of a corporation exempt under
section 501(c)(3) of the Code or an organization to which contributions are deductible under section 170(c)(2)
of the Code. Because you do not meet the operational test, you do not qualify for exemption under section
501(c)(3) of the Code.

The facts indicate that V will benefit directly from your operations. You will direct funds to V, a for-profit Sub
S Corporation owned by your president, B. Your funds will be used to offset operating costs and to purchase
equipment and supplies that V would otherwise be responsible for these costs. Accordingly, your board
members, a majority of whom are related, benefit from the funds you direct to V’s operations. Since your
earnings inure to the benefit of private individuals, you do not meet the requirements of Treas. Reg. §
1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(2). Your board members are private shareholders or individuals as described in Treas. Reg. §
1.501(a)-1(c) because they have a personal and private interest in your activities.

Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1) states an organization will not be exempt if more than an insubstantial part of
its activities is not in furtherance of an exempt purpose. You are paying expenses for which V would otherwise
be liable. V is a related for-profit school owned by B, your president. As a result, your operations are providing
a substantial private benefit to V and B, a substantial non-exempt purpose.

Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii) provides that an organization is not organized and operated exclusively for
exempt purposes unless it serves a public rather than a private interest. You were formed to subsidize the

Letter 4036 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47630W

5

operations of V. Thus, because of V’s relationship with you, it receives the benefit of receiving equipment and
supplies free of charge that it would otherwise have to purchase.

Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii) also provides that the organization must establish that it is not organized or
operated to benefit private interests such as designated individuals or the persons who created it. By purchasing
equipment and supplies that will be used exclusively at V, you are benefitting the private interests of B, your
president who founded and owns V as an S Corporation.

You do not meet the provisions of section 509(a)(3)(A) of the Code and Treas. Reg. § 1.509-4(b) because you
are organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of V, a for-profit S Corporation founded by your
president, B. Generally, in order to be a supporting organization under section 509(a)(3) of the Code, you must
have been organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the
purposes of one or more specified publicly supported organizations (i.e., an organization exempt under
501(c)(3) and publicly supported under either section 509(a)(1) or section 509(a)(2)).

You are similar to the organization described in Rev. Rul. 76-206 in that the organization’s activities in the
ruling helped a for-profit radio station increase its total revenues. Likewise, you are helping a for-profit school
increase its total revenues by subsidizing operating costs it would otherwise incur. The fact that the organization
in the ruling had a board of directors from the community at large who did not include any representatives of
the for-profit radio station did not strengthen their claim to exemption.

As held in Better Business Bureau of Washington, DC, Inc., a single non-exempt purpose, if substantial, will
preclude tax exemption under section 501(c)(3) of the Code. Your activities result in substantial private benefit
to V, and your earnings inure to the benefit of your president, B, the owner and founder of V. Like the
organization described in this case, an organization with the presence of a single non-exempt purpose, if
substantial in nature, will destroy a claim for exemption regardless of the number or importance of other exempt

purposes.

You are similar to the organizations in est of Hawaii, and International Postgraduate Medical Foundation,
given that V’s for-profit activities benefit from your operations. You were formed as a supporting organization
to, and intended your funds to be distributed to V in the form of purchasing equipment and supplies for the
school. You are serving as an “instrument” to further the purposes of V. Because your related for-profit
organization, V, benefits substantially from the manner in which you operate, you are not operated exclusively
for exempt purposes.

You are comparable to the organization described in Salvation Navy because you could not prove that you were
not organized and operated to serve the private interests of your president, B.

Conclusion

You are not operated exclusively for exempt purposes as set forth in section 501(c)(3). Your net earnings inure
to the benefit of your president, a private individual. In addition, it is clear that your operations result in
substantial private benefit to V.

Letter 4036 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47630W

6

As a result, we conclude that you are not operated exclusively for public rather than private purposes. We
conclude based on the stated facts that you do not qualify for tax exemption because more than an insubstantial
part of your activities is not in furtherance of exempt purposes. Therefore, you do not qualify for exemption
under section 501(c)(3).

Because we have determined you are not exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Code, you do not meet the
requirements of a supporting organization under section 509(a)(3)(A).

If you don’t agree

You have a right to file a protest if you don’t agree with our proposed adverse determination. To do so, you
must send a statement to us within 30 days of the date of this letter. The statement must include:

• Your name, address, employer identification number (EIN), and a daytime phone
number

• A copy of this letter highlighting the findings you disagree with
• An explanation of why you disagree, including any supporting documents
• The law or authority, if any, you are relying on

• The signature of an officer, director, trustee, or other official who is authorized to sign for the
organization, or your authorized representative

• One of the following declarations:

For an officer, director, trustee, or other official who is authorized to sign for the organization:
Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I examined this protest statement, including

accompanying documents, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, the statement contains all
relevant facts and such facts are true, correct, and complete.

For authorized representatives:

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I prepared this protest statement, including
accompanying documents, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, the statement contains all
relevant facts and such facts are true, correct, and complete.

Your representative (attorney, certified public accountant, or other individual enrolled to practice before the
IRS) must file a Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative, with us if he or she hasn’t
already done so. You can find more information about representation in Publication 947, Practice Before the
IRS and Power of Attorney.

We’ll review your protest statement and decide if you provided a basis for us to reconsider our determination. If
so, we’ll continue to process your case considering the information you provided. If you haven’t provided a
basis for reconsideration, we’ll forward your case to the Office of Appeals and notify you. You can find more

Letter 4036 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47630W

7

information about the role of the Appeals Office in Publication 892, How to Appeal an IRS Decision on Tax-
Exempt Status.

If you don’t file a protest within 30 days, you can’t seek a declaratory judgment in court at a later date because
the law requires that you use the IRS administrative process first (Section 7428(b)(2) of the Code).

Where to send your protest

Please send your protest statement, Form 2848, if needed, and any supporting documents to the applicable
address:

U.S. mail: Street address for delivery service:
Internal Revenue Service Internal Revenue Service

EO Determinations Quality Assurance EO Determinations Quality Assurance
Room 7-008 550 Main Street, Room 7-008

P.O. Box 2508 Cincinnati, OH 45202

Cincinnati, OH 45201

You can also fax your statement and supporting documents to the fax number listed at the top of this letter. If
you fax your statement, please contact the person listed at the top of this letter to confirm that he or she received
it.

If you agree

If you agree with our proposed adverse determination, you don’t need to do anything. If we don’t hear from you
within 30 days, we’ll issue a final adverse determination letter. That letter will provide information on your
income tax filing requirements.

You can find all forms and publications mentioned in this letter on our website at www.irs.gov/formspubs. If
you have questions, you can contact the person listed at the top of this letter.

Sincerely,

Jeffrey I. Cooper
Director, Exempt Organizations
Rulings and Agreements

Enclosure:
Publication 892

Letter 4036 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47630W