🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 201716004 Released April 21, 2017 Approved

Corporation retains S status after missing trust consents and distribution failures

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2017, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2017
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An S corporation's election was invalid because the income beneficiaries of 21 qualified subchapter S trusts did not sign the shareholder consents. One of those trusts also failed in two years to distribute all of its income currently, which would have independently terminated a valid S election. The trust later distributed the undistributed income, and the corporation consistently filed as an S corporation. The IRS found both failures inadvertent and treated the corporation as an S corporation from its intended election date. Relief was conditioned on filing signed consents from all 21 trust beneficiaries within 120 days.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the corporation retain continuous S status despite missing QSST beneficiary consents and a trust's income-distribution failures?
  • Outcome: approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 643(b), 1361(d), and 1362(a), (d), and (f); Treas. Reg. § 1.1362-6

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201716004 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/21/2017 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.04-00
Person To Contact:
--------------------------- --------------------------, ID No. ----------------
----------------------------------------------- -----------------
--------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------- ---------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B03
PLR-122217-16
Date:
January 12, 2017

Legend

X = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------

State = ------------------

D1 = -----------------------

D2 = ----------------------

Year1 = -------

Year2 = -------

Trust1 = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Trust2 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------

Trust3 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------

Trust4 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Trust5 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------

Trust6 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------

Trust7 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLR-122217-16 2

            -----------------------------------

Trust8 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------

Trust9 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------

Trust10 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------

Trust11 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------

Trust12 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------

Trust13 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------

Trust14 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------

Trust15 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------

Trust16 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------

Trust17 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------

Trust18 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------

Trust19 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------

Trust20 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------

Trust21 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
PLR-122217-16 3

Dear -----------:

   This letter responds to a letter dated July 7, 2016, submitted on behalf of X by its

authorized representative, requesting a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue
Code (Code).

                                       FACTS

   X was organized under the laws of State on D1 and elected to be an S

corporation effective D2. The information submitted states that the Form 2553 that X
filed was not signed by the current income beneficiaries of Trust1 through Trust21,
which were qualified subchapter S trusts (QSSTs) within the meaning of § 1361(d).
Therefore X’s S corporation election was invalid.

    X also represents that in Year1 and Year2, Trust17 failed to distribute all of its

income (within the meaning of § 643(b)) in accordance with the requirement in
§ 1361(d)(3)(B). Trust17’s trust agreement did not require that all income from the trust
be distributed currently to the trust beneficiary. Had X’s S corporation election been
valid, the failure of Trust17 to distribute all of its income currently to its income
beneficiary in Year1 and Year2 would have terminated X’s S corporation election. X
represents that Trust17 has since distributed all of the undistributed income to its
beneficiary.

    X represents that neither the invalid election nor Trust17’s failure to distribute the

income was intentional or motivated by tax avoidance. X further represents that it has
filed consistently as an S corporation since D2. X and its shareholders have agreed to
make any adjustments that the Commissioner may require, consistent with the
treatment of X as an S corporation.

                               LAW AND ANALYSIS

    Section 1361(b)(1) provides that the term “small business corporation” means a

domestic corporation which is not an ineligible corporation and which does not (A) have
more than 100 shareholders, (B) have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate,
a trust described in § 1361(c)(2), or an organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is
not an individual, (C) have a nonresident alien as a shareholder, and (D) have more
than one class of stock.

   Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(i) provides that for purposes of § 1361(b)(1)(B), a trust all

of which is treated (under subpart E of part I of subchapter J of Chapter 1) as owned by
an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States may be a shareholder.

   Section 1361(d)(3) defines a QSST to mean, in part, a trust all of the income

PLR-122217-16 4

(within the meaning of §643(b)) of which is distributed (or required to be distributed)
currently to one individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States.

  Section 1362(a) provides that, except as provided in § 1362(g), a small business

corporation may elect, in accordance with the provisions of § 1362, to be an S
corporation.

  Section 1362(a)(2) provides that an S corporation election shall be valid only if all

persons who are shareholders in such corporation on the day on which such election is
made consent to such election.

   Section 1.1362-6(a)(2)(i) provides that an S corporation election is not valid

unless all shareholders of the corporation at the time of the election consent to the
election in the manner provided in 1.1362-6(b).

   Section 1.1362-6(b)(2)(iv) provides that in the case of a trust described in section

1361(c)(2)(A) (including a trust treated under section 1361(d)(1)(A) as a trust described
in section 1361(c)(2)(A)(i) and excepting an electing small business trusts described in
section 1361(c)(2)(A)(v)), only the person treated as the shareholder for purposes of
section 1361(b)(1) must consent to the election.

   Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that an election under § 1362(a) will be

terminated whenever (at any time on or after the first day of the first taxable year for
which the corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small
business corporation. Section 1362(d)(2)(B) provides that any termination under
§ 1362(d) is effective on and after the date of cessation.

    Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) or

§ 1361(b)(3)(B)(ii) by any corporation (A) was not effective for the taxable year for which
made (determined without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the
requirements of § 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consents or (B) was terminated
under § 1362(d)(2) or (3) or § 1361(b)(3)(C), (2) the Secretary determines that the
circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent, (3) no
later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in
the ineffectiveness or termination, steps were taken (A) so that the corporation for which
the election was made or the termination occurred is a small business corporation or a
qualified subchapter S subsidiary (QSub), as the case may be, or (B) to acquire the
shareholder consents, and (4) the corporation for which the election was made or the
termination occurred, and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any
time during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments
(consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation or a QSub, as the
case may be) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then,
notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, the
PLR-122217-16 5

corporation will be treated as an S corporation or a QSub, as the case may be during
the period specified by the Secretary.

                                  CONCLUSION

     Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude

that X’s S corporation election was invalid on D2. In addition, had X’s S corporation
election not been invalid, we conclude that its S corporation election would have
terminated at the end of Year1, and again at the end of Year2, when X had an ineligible
shareholder due to Trust17’s failure to distribute (and lack of a requirement to distribute)
all of its income currently to its income beneficiary. We also conclude that the
circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness and termination of X’s S corporation
election were inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f). Accordingly, under § 1362(f),
X will be treated as an S corporation from D2 and thereafter, provided that X’s S
corporation election was otherwise valid and has not otherwise terminated under
§ 1362(d) for reasons not addressed in this letter.

    This ruling is conditioned on X filing consents to the S corporation election signed

by the beneficiaries of Trust1 through Trust21 with an effective date of D2 with the
appropriate service center within 120 days from the date of this letter. Those consents
may also include any missing information as required by § 1.1362-6(b)(1). A copy of
this letter should be attached to the consent statements.

   Except as specifically ruled above, we express or imply no opinion concerning

the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provisions
of the Code. Specifically, we express or imply no opinion as to whether X was
otherwise eligible to be treated an S corporation.

   The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations

submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on examination.

   This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)

of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-122217-16 6

  In accordance with a power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a

copy of this letter to X’s authorized representative.

                                     Sincerely,



                                     Holly Porter
                                     Branch Chief, Branch 3
                                     Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                     (Passthroughs and Special Industries)

Enclosures (2):

  Copy of this letter
  Copy for § 6110 purposes

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2017, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.