🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 201710017 Released March 10, 2017 Approved

Partnership shareholder receives inadvertent S termination relief

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2017, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2017
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Shares of an S corporation were transferred to a partnership, which was not an eligible S corporation shareholder. When the corporation discovered that the transfer had terminated its S election, the partnership promptly transferred the shares to an eligible individual. The corporation represented that the mistake was not intended or tax-motivated, all shareholders had filed consistently with continued S status, and any required adjustments would be made. The IRS treated the termination as inadvertent and allowed the corporation to continue as an S corporation. For the relief period, the partnership was treated as the shareholder until the corrective transfer, after which the individual was treated as the shareholder.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the corporation preserve its S election after shares were inadvertently held by an ineligible partnership?
  • Outcome: approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(b), 1362(d), and 1362(f)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201710017 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 3/10/2017 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.01-00, 1362.01-02,
1362.02-00, 1362.02-02, Person To Contact:
1362.04-00, 1362.00-00 ----------------------------,
ID No. ------------------
Telephone Number:
------------------------------------------ ----------------------
----------------------------- Refer Reply To:
----------------------------- CC:PSI:B01
------------------------------------- PLR-122758-16
Date:
November 02, 2016

LEGEND

X = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

State = ---------

Date 1 = ----------------------------

Date 2 = ----------------------

Date 3 = -------------------

Date 4 = ------------------------

Date 5 = ----------------------

a = ----

Partnership = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PLR-122758-16 2

Y = ------------------------------

Dear -------------------:

  This responds to a letter dated July 11, 2016, and subsequent correspondence,

submitted on behalf of X by X's authorized representative, requesting relief under
§ 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code).

FACTS

   According to the information submitted, X was incorporated under the laws of

State on Date 1. X elected to be treated as an S corporation effective Date 2. On Date
3, a shares of stock in X were transferred to Partnership, a partnership for federal tax
purposes. Partnership, as a partnership, was an ineligible shareholder of an S
corporation. On Date 4, X learned that the transfer of stock to Partnership terminated
X's S election. Immediately thereafter, X and its shareholders took remedial action by
having Partnership's a shares transferred to Y, an individual who is an eligible S
corporation shareholder. After Date 5, all income and other items from the a shares
was allocated to Y. Between Date 3 and Date 5, all Partnership’s partners were eligible
shareholders of an S corporation, or were themselves partnerships whose partners
were eligible shareholders of an S corporation.

   X represents that it did not intend for its S corporation election to terminate and

that the events that resulted in the termination were not motivated by tax avoidance or
retroactive tax planning. X represents that all shareholders filed their returns consistent
with X being an S corporation. Further, X and its shareholders agree to make any
adjustments required by the Secretary consistent with the treatment of X as an S
corporation.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

    Section 1361(a)(1) provides that the term “S corporation” means, with respect to

any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is
in effect for such year.

   Section 1361(b)(1) defines a “small business corporation” as a domestic

corporation that is not an ineligible corporation and that does not (A) have more than
100 shareholders, (B) have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, a trust
described in § 1361(c)(2), or an organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is not an
individual, (C) have a nonresident alien as a shareholder, and (D) have more than one
class of stock.
PLR-122758-16 3

  Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that an election under § 1362(a) shall be

terminated whenever the corporation ceases to be a small business corporation.

   Section 1362(f) provides, in relevant part, that if (1) an election under § 1362(a)

by any corporation was terminated under paragraph (2) or (3) of § 1362(d), (2) the
Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in such termination were
inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the
circumstances resulting in termination, steps were taken so that the corporation is once
more a small business corporation, and (4) the corporation and each person who was a
shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to
§ 1362(f), agrees to make any adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the
corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to
the period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in the termination, the
corporation will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation during the period
specified by the Secretary.

CONCLUSION

    Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, we

conclude that X's S election terminated on Date 3 when the a shares of X stock were
transferred to Partnership. We further conclude that the termination was inadvertent
within the meaning of § 1362(f).

   Accordingly, under § 1362(f), X will be treated as continuing to be an S

corporation on and after Date 3, provided that X's S corporation election was valid and
not otherwise terminated under § 1362(d). Partnership will be treated as the
shareholder of the a shares from Date 3 until Date 5, at which point Y will be treated as
the shareholder. Accordingly, the shareholders of X must include in income their pro
rata share of the separately stated and nonseparately computed items of X as provided
in § 1366, make an adjustments to basis as provided in § 1367, and take into account
any distributions made by X as provided in § 1368.

   Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied

concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter. Specifically, no opinion is expressed concerning whether X is
otherwise eligible to be treated as an S corporation.

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. According to

§ 6110(k)(3), this ruling may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-122758-16 4

    Pursuant to the power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of

this letter to X’s authorized representative.

                                      Sincerely,



                                      Laura C. Fields
                                      Laura C. Fields
                                      Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 1
                                      Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                      (Passthroughs & Special Industries)


   Enclosures (2)

Copy of this letter
Copy of this letter for § 6110 purposes

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2017, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.