🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 201710009 Released March 10, 2017 Approved

Trust decanting cures an inadvertent S termination

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2017, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2017
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A shareholder transferred S corporation stock to a nongrantor complex trust that was not an eligible S corporation shareholder. Neither the shareholder nor the corporation understood that the transfer terminated the S election. After discovering the problem, the trustees decanted the trust into a grantor trust that qualified as an eligible shareholder and transferred the stock to that trust. The IRS found the termination inadvertent and allowed the corporation to continue as an S corporation from the transfer date. It expressly declined to rule on the tax consequences of the trust decanting itself.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the corporation preserve S status after stock was inadvertently transferred to an ineligible nongrantor complex trust?
  • Outcome: approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(b), 1361(c)(2)(A)(i), 1362(d), and 1362(f)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201710009 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 3/10/2017 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.04-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------------------------- ---------------------------, ID No. -------------------
----------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------
---------------------- Telephone Number:
-------------------------------- ----------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B03
PLR-121326-16
Date:
December 08, 2016

     LEGEND

     X         =-------------------------------------------------
     ------------------------------------------------------------
     -
     -------------------------------------

     State = --------------

     Date 1 = ----------------------------

     Date 2 = ----------------------------

     Y        = ---------------------

     Trust = ------------------------------------------------
     ------------------------------------------------------------
     ----------------------

     n        = ----------------------------

Dear ---------------------:
PLR-121326-16 2

  This responds to a letter dated June 27, 2016, and subsequent correspondence,

submitted on behalf of X by its authorized representative requesting a ruling under
§ 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code).

                                     FACTS

  X was organized on Date 1 as a corporation under the laws of State. Effective

Date 1, X elected to be treated as an S corporation.

     On Date 2, Y transferred n shares in X to Trust. Trust was a non-grantor

complex trust. At the time of the transfer, Y was unaware of X’s S corporation status
and both X and Y were unaware of the rule in § 1361(b)(1)(B) of the Code that requires
all of the shareholders of an S corporation to be individuals (aside from certain excepted
trusts and organizations).

   X was made aware of the termination of its S corporation status in connection

with the administration of the estate of another shareholder. As a result, the trustees of
Trust decanted Trust into a grantor trust that qualified as a S corporation shareholder
pursuant to § 1361(c)(2)(A)(i) of the Code. The shares of X stock formerly held by the
Trust have been transferred to the grantor trust.

    X represents that X and its shareholders intended for X to be an S corporation

effective Date 1 and that X has filed all returns consistent with X’s status as an S
corporation since Date 1. X and its shareholders agree to make any adjustments
required as a condition of obtaining relief under the inadvertent termination rule as
provided in § 1362(f) of the Code.

                              LAW AND ANALYSIS

    Section 1361(a)(1) provides that the term “S corporation” means, with respect to

any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is
in effect for the year.

   Section 1361(b)(1) defines a “small business corporation” as a domestic

corporation which is not an ineligible corporation which does not (A) have more than
100 shareholders, (B) have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, and a trust
described in § 1361(c)(2), or an organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is not an
individual, (C) have a nonresident alien as a shareholder, and (D) have more than one
class of stock.

   Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(i) provides in relevant part that a trust all of which is

treated (under subpart E of part I of subchapter J of Chapter 1 of the Code) as owned
by an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States qualifies as a
shareholder pursuant to § 1361(b)(1)(B).
PLR-121326-16 3

   Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides than an election under § 1362(a) shall be

terminated whenever (at any time on or after the 1st day of the 1st taxable year for
which the corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small
business corporation. Section 1362(d)(2)(B) further provides that the termination shall
be effective on and after the date of cessation.

    Section 1362(f) provides, in relevant part, that if (1) an election under § 1362(a)

by any corporation (A) was not effective for the taxable year for which made
(determined without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the
requirements of § 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consents or (B) was terminated
under § 1362(d)(2) or (3), (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting
in the ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable
period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or
termination, steps were taken (A) so that the corporation is a small business corporation
or (B) to acquire the shareholder consents, and (4) the corporation and each person
who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified
pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment
of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with
respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in the
ineffectiveness or termination, the corporation will be treated as an S corporation during
the period specified by the Secretary.

                                 CONCLUSION

   Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that

X’s S corporation election terminated on Date 2 when Y transferred n shares of stock
into Trust. However, we conclude that such termination was inadvertent within the
meaning of § 1362(f). Therefore, X will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation
from Date 2 and thereafter, provided X’s S corporation election was otherwise valid and,
apart from the inadvertent termination ruling described above, has not otherwise
terminated under § 1362(d).

     Except as specifically ruled upon above, we express or imply no opinion

concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other
provision of the Code. Specifically, we express or imply no opinion regarding X’s
eligibility to be an S corporation. Furthermore, no opinion is expressed or implied as to
the federal tax consequences of the decanting of Trust into a grantor trust.

  The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations

submitted by the taxpayer and is accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement
executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material
submitted in support of this request, it is subject to verification on examination.
PLR-121326-16 4

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of

the Code provides that this ruling may not be used or cited as precedent.

    Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending copies of

this letter to your authorized representative.

                                          Sincerely,




                                          Richard T. Probst
                                          Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
                                          Associate Chief Counsel
                                          (Passthroughs and Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2017, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.