🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 201709021 Released March 3, 2017 Approved

Late Form 1128 is treated as timely filed

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2017, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2017
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer sought to change from a calendar tax year to a tax year ending March 31. Its tax professional filed Form 1128 late because of an oversight or misunderstanding. The IRS found that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith and that relief would not prejudice the government. It therefore treated the late application as timely filed for the requested short period. The ruling did not decide whether the accounting-period change itself was permissible, which remained subject to separate processing under Revenue Procedure 2002-39.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could a late Form 1128 be treated as timely when a tax professional missed the filing deadline?
  • Outcome: approved as to timeliness only
  • Key authorities: IRC § 442; Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 2002-39

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201709021 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 3/3/2017 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.09-00
Person To Contact:
--------------------- ----------------------, ID No. ------------------
----------------------- Telephone Number/Fax Number:
-------------------------------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------
---------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
-------------- CC:ITA:B04
---------------------------- PLR-129819-16
Date:
November 22, 2016
TIN: -----------------

Legend:
Taxpayer = --------------------------------------------
Year 1 = -------

Dear -----------------:

This is in reference to a Form 1128, Application to Adopt, Change, or Retain a Tax
Year, that the Taxpayer filed requesting to change its taxable year from a tax year
ending December 31 to a tax year ending March 31, effective with the tax year ending
March 31, Year 1. The Taxpayer has requested that the Form 1128 be considered
timely filed under the authority contained in § 301.9100-3 of the Regulations on
Procedure and Administration.

The Taxpayer's Form 1128 requesting a change in accounting period to a tax year
ending March 31 was required to be filed on or before July 15, Year 1. The information
furnished indicates that the application for the change in accounting period was filed late
because of an oversight or misunderstanding on the part of the Taxpayer’s tax
professional.

Section 6.02(1) of Rev. Proc. 2002-39, 2002-1 C.B. 1046, provides that a taxpayer must
file a Form 1128 no earlier than the day following the end of the first effective year and
no later than the due date (not including extensions) of the federal income tax return for
the first effective tax year.

Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for extensions of time for regulatory
elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2 (automatic extensions),
such as the situation you present, must be made under the rules of § 301.9100-3.
Requests for relief subject to § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides
PLR-129819-16 2

evidence to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith and that the
granting of relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

Based on the facts and information submitted and the representations made, we
conclude that the taxpayer has acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting
of relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Accordingly, the
requirements of the regulations for the granting of relief have been satisfied in this case,
and the Taxpayer's late filed Form 1128 requesting permission to change to a tax year
ending March 31, effective for the short period of January 1 to March 31, Year 1, is
considered timely filed.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter. Specifically, we express no opinion as to whether the Taxpayer is permitted
under the Code, applicable regulations, and revenue procedures to change to the tax
year requested in the Form 1128. The Form 1128 will be processed under the
procedures of Rev. Proc. 2002-39 and will require the Taxpayer to submit a separate
request under the revenue procedure.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the Taxpayer and its representatives and accompanied by a penalty of
perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified
any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to
verification on examination.

                                   Sincerely,



                                   Donna J. Welsh
                                   Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 4
                                   Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                   (Income Tax & Accounting)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2017, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.