Investment funds may revoke their section 4982 elections

Plain-English summary

Two regulated investment funds had elected to use their calendar tax years instead of the October 31 measurement period when calculating required distributions for the section 4982 excise tax. The funds found that the elections increased administrative burdens and asked to revoke them for non-tax reasons. The IRS consented because the revocations were not intended to secure a tax benefit, did not use hindsight, and would not prejudice the government. For the transition year, capital gain net income would be measured over the ten months from January 1 through October 31 so that November and December were not counted twice. The funds could not make another section 4982(e)(4)(A) election for five calendar years.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Could the two regulated investment funds revoke their elections to use their taxable years for section 4982 required-distribution calculations?
• Outcome: approved, with a five-year bar on a new election
• Key authorities: IRC § 4982(b) and (e)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201709018 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 3/3/2017 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 4982.06-00, 4982.00-00,
4982.05-00 Person To Contact:
----------------------, ID No. ------------------
-------------------------- Telephone Number:
-------------- ----------------------
--------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
-------------------------------------------------- CC:FIP:B01
------------------------- PLR-123947-16
------------------------------- Date:
November 15, 2016

Legend

Fund 1 = ---------------------------------------
-------------------------

Fund 2 = ------------------------------------------
-------------------------

Sponsor --------------------------

Trust = -------------------------------------

State = --------------

Year 1 = -------

Dear -----------------:

  This responds to a letter dated August 1, 2016, submitted on behalf of Fund 1

and Fund 2 (collectively, “Funds”). Funds request consent to revoke a previous election
made by Funds under section 4982(e)(4)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”), for
Year 1 and subsequent years.

                                                 FACTS

  Each Fund is a diversified series of Trust organized under the laws of State.

Each Fund is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a diversified
open-end management company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15
U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq., as amended. Each Fund has made an election under section
PLR-123947-16 2

851(a) to be treated as a regulated investment company (“RIC) for federal income tax
purposes under Subtitle A, Chapter 1, Subchapter M of the Code. Each Fund’s overall
method of accounting is an accrual method and its taxable year is the calendar year.

    Funds represent that upon the addition of section 4982 to the Code by the Tax

Reform Act of 19861, each Fund separately elected under section 4982(e)(4)(A) to use
its taxable year ending on December 31 in lieu of the one-year period ending on
October 31 for the purposes of calculating the required distribution under sections
4982(b)(1) and (e) in order to avoid payment of an excise tax under section 4982(a).

    Funds represent that the elections under section 4982(e)(4)(A) were made in an

attempt to reduce the complexity of tax accounting associated with calculating required
distributions of ordinary income, capital gain net income, foreign currency gains and
losses, and gains and losses pursuant to section 1296 under the excise tax and
subchapter M provision of the Code. However, Funds’ experience has been that their
section 4982(e)(4) elections have created additional administrative burdens, primarily
due to time constraints in declaring required excise tax distributions. Further, the
promulgation of regulations coordinating the excise tax and subchapter M provisions
has greatly reduced the administrative burden of having a tax year different from the
period used for determining Funds’ required distributions under section 4982.

   Accordingly, each Fund seeks consent to revoke its election to use the taxable

year for purposes of calculating its required distribution for purposes of sections 4982(b)
and 4982(e). Each Fund makes the following representations:

   1. Fund’s desire to revoke its election is due to administrative and non-tax
   related financial burdens caused by the election;

   2. Fund is not seeking to revoke its election in order to preserve or secure
   a tax benefit;

   3. Fund will neither benefit through hindsight, nor prejudice the interest of
   the government if permitted to revoke its election; and

   4. Fund will not make a subsequent election under section 4982(e)(4)(A)
   for at least five calendar years following the year of the grant of
   revocation.

                                     Law and Analysis

1
Section 4982 was added to the Code by § 651(a) of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-514, 100
Stat. 2085, 2294 (October 22, 1986), effective for calendar years beginning after December 31, 1986.
PLR-123947-16 3

    Section 4982(a) imposes an excise tax on every RIC for each calendar year,

equal to 4 percent of the excess, if any, of the “required distribution” over the
“distributed amount” for the calendar year.

   Section 4982(b)(1) defines the term “required distribution” to mean, with respect

to any calendar year, the sum of (A) 98 percent of the RIC’s ordinary income for such
calendar year (as defined in section 4982(e)(1)), plus (B) 98.2 percent of its capital gain
net income for the one-year period ending on October 31 of such calendar year.

  Section 4982(e)(4)(A) provides that if the taxable year of a RIC ends with the

month of November or December, the RIC may elect to have its taxable year taken into
account in lieu of the one-year period ending on October 31 of the calendar year for
purposes of satisfying the required distribution defined in section 4982(b)(1)(B). Section
4982(e)(4)(B) provides that, once made, such election may be revoked only with the
consent of the Secretary.

   Section 4982(e)(5)(A) provides that any specified gain or specified loss which

would be properly taken into account for the portion of the calendar year after October
31 shall be treated as arising on January 1 of the following calendar year. Section
4982(e)(5)(B) defines “specified gain” and “specified loss” as ordinary gain or loss from
the sale, exchange, or other disposition of property (including the termination of a
position with respect to such property). The terms include any foreign currency gain or
loss attributable to a section 988 transaction and any amount includible in gross income
under section 1296(a)(1), in the case of gain, or allowable as a deduction under section
1296(a)(2), in the case of loss. Section 4982(e)(5)(C) provides that if a RIC makes an
election under section 4982(e)(4), the last day of the RIC’s taxable year will be
substituted for October 31.

   Section 4982(e)(6)(A) provides that, for the purposes of determining a RIC’s

ordinary income, each specified mark-to-market provision shall be applied as if such
RIC’s taxable year ended on October 31. Section 4982(e)(6)(A) also provides that in
the case of a RIC making an election under section 4982(e)(4), the preceding sentence
shall be applied by substituting the last day of the RIC’s taxable year for October 31.
Section 4982(e)(6)(B) defines “specified mark to market provision” as sections 1256 and
1296 and any other provision of the Code (or regulations thereunder) which treats
property as disposed of on the last day of the taxable year or which determines income
by reference to the value of an item on the last day of the taxable year.

   Sections 4982(b)(1)(B) and 4982(e) provide that a RIC with a calendar year that

does not have a section 4982(e)(4)(a) election in effect will compute capital gain net
income for a one-year period ending on October 31. For a RIC that is revoking its
election under section 4982(e)(4)(A), there is a possible inference that, for the first year
following the revocation, such RIC’s calculation of its capital gain net income will include
the November-December period twice, once as part of the preceding calendar year and
PLR-123947-16 4

then again as part of the one-year period calculation for the year of change. To clarify
that such a double inclusion is not required, each Fund has requested that the
calculation of its required distribution with respect to capital gain net income be
determined on the basis of capital gain net income realized and recognized during the
ten-month period from January 1 through October 31 of Year 1.

                                   CONCLUSION

   Based upon the information submitted and the representations made, we

conclude that Funds' desire to revoke their elections under section 4982(e)(4)(A)
because of administrative burdens and not because of any federal tax-related financial
burden caused by the election. Funds do not seek to revoke their elections for the
purpose of preserving or securing a federal tax benefit. Additionally, Funds will neither
benefit through hindsight nor prejudice the interests of the government as a result of
being permitted to revoke their elections.

   Accordingly, it is held as follows:

   1. Pursuant to section 4982(e)(4)(B), the Secretary consents to the revocation of

the elections made by Funds under section 4982(e)(4)(A), effective for the calendar
year Year 1 and subsequent years.

   2. In addition, in calculating each Fund’s required distribution for calendar year

Year 1, for purposes of sections 4982(b)(1) and (e)(2), the capital gain net income will
be determined on the basis of the capital gains and losses realized and recognized
during the ten-month period from January 1 through October 31 of Year 1.

   As a condition to the Secretary’s consent to the revocation pursuant to section

4982(e)(4)(B), Funds may not make a subsequent election under section 4982(e)(4)(A)
for a period of 5 calendar years following the year to which the grant of revocation
applies.

   Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied

concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter, including whether Funds qualify as RICs.

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayers requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)

provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-123947-16 5

     In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this

letter is being sent to your authorized representatives. A copy of this letter must be
attached to any federal income or excise tax returns file by Funds for the year to which
this ruling applies.

                                  Sincerely,



                                  _______________________________
                                  Robert A. Martin
                                  Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 1
                                  Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                  (Financial Institutions & Products)

Enclosures (2)
A copy of this letter
A copy for § 6110 purposes

cc: