🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 201707009 Released February 17, 2017 Approved

Fund receives 90 days to make a late foreign tax election

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2017, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2017
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A regulated investment company intended to elect under section 853 so its shareholders would be treated as paying their shares of certain foreign taxes paid by the fund. Its accountant prepared a Form 7004 extension request and told the fund it had been filed, but later discovered that the form had never been mailed. The fund had already notified shareholders of the intended election and sought relief before the IRS discovered the omission. The IRS found good cause for late-election relief and granted 90 days to make the section 853 election. The ruling did not determine whether the fund otherwise qualified as a regulated investment company or whether the election reduced aggregate tax liability.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the fund make its section 853 foreign tax election after its return extension was not mailed?
  • Outcome: approved, with 90 days to make the election
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 851, 852, and 853; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.853-4, 301.9100-1, and 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201707009 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 2/17/2017 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.00-00, 853.01-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------------------------------- --------------------------, ID No. ----------------


------------------------- Telephone Number:
--------------------- ----------------------
--------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:FIP:B02
PLR-121507-16
Date:
November 21, 2016

Legend:

Fund = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
State = --------------
Date 1 = ---------------------------
Date 2 = ---------------------------
Date 3 = ---------------------------
Date 4 = --------------------------
Date 5 = --------------------
Advisor = --------------------------------------------------------------
Accountant = -----------------------

Dear ---------------:

This is in reply to a letter dated July 6, 2016, and supplemental correspondence,
requesting an extension of time under sections 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the
Procedure and Administration Regulations for Fund to make an election under section
853(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code).

                                               FACTS

Fund is a State statutory trust registered as an open-end diversified management
investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. section
80a-1, et seq., as amended (the 1940 Act). Fund elected to be taxed as a regulated
investment company (RIC) pursuant to section 851 effective for its initial taxable year
ended Date 1 and has operated in a manner intended to qualify as a RIC ever since.
PLR-121507-16 2

Fund intended to make an election under section 853 to have its shareholders treated
as if they had paid their proportionate share of certain foreign taxes paid by Fund for the
taxable year ended Date 3. Fund made the election under section 853 for the taxable
year ended Date 2 (the prior taxable year). Additionally, Fund represents that it
provided notice to its shareholders of the election in the annual report for the year
ended Date 3, which was provided to shareholders within 60 days of year end.

For the taxable year ended Date 3, Fund intended to file a Form 7004, Application for
Automatic 6-Month Extension of Time to File Certain Business Income Tax, Information,
and Other Returns (Form 7004), to extend the due date of its Form 1120-RIC, U.S.
Income Tax Return for Regulated Investment Companies (Form 1120-RIC). As
discussed below, the Form 7004 was not filed. Therefore, the election was due Date 4,
the due date, without extensions, of the Form 1120-RIC for the taxable year ended Date
3.

Fund engaged Advisor as its investment advisor and tax matters administrator. Advisor
engaged Accountant to prepare both the Form 1120-RIC and Form 7004. Accountant
generally prepares the Form 7004 and mails it to the Internal Revenue Service (the
Service) via certified mail prior to the due date for filing the return. Accountant timely
drafted the Form 7004 and notified Fund that it had been filed. However, on Date 5,
when Accountant attempted to match the sender receipt with a return receipt so that it
could enter the certified mail receipts in the client electronic file, Accountant discovered
that Fund’s Form 7004 had not been mailed. Accountant immediately notified the client
that Fund’s return for the taxable year ended Date 3 had not been extended.

The following representations are made in connection with the request for an extension
of time:

  1. The request for relief was filed before the failure to make the regulatory election
    was discovered by the Service.

  2. Fund does not seek to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related
    penalty has been or could have been imposed under section 6662 of the Code.

  3. Fund did not choose not to make the election after being informed in all material
    respects of the required election and related tax consequences.

  4. Fund is not using hindsight in making the decision to seek the relief requested.
    No specific facts have changed since the due date for making the election that
    make the election more advantageous to Fund now than it would have been had
    the election been timely made.
    PLR-121507-16 3

  5. Granting an extension of time to make the election will result in the same
    aggregate tax liability with respect to all affected taxpayers as would have
    resulted had the election been timely made.

  6. All taxable years affected by the election are open under the statute of
    limitations.

In addition, affidavits on behalf of Fund have been provided as required by sections
301.9100-3(e)(2) and (3) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations.

                              LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 853(a) of the Code provides that if more than 50 percent of the value—as
defined in section 851(c)(4)—of a RIC’s total assets at the close of the taxable year
consists of stock or securities in foreign corporations and the RIC meets the
requirements of section 852(a) for the taxable year, the RIC may elect to have its
shareholders treated as if they had paid their proportionate share of certain foreign
taxes paid by the RIC during the taxable year.

Under section 1.853-4(a) of the Income Tax Regulations, to make an election under
section 853(a) for a taxable year, a RIC must file a statement of election as part of its
federal income tax return for the taxable year. Section 1.853-4(b) provides that this
election must be made no later than the time prescribed for filing the return (including
extensions), and is irrevocable with respect to the dividend (or portion thereof), and the
foreign taxes paid with respect thereto, to which the election applies.

Section 301.9100-1(c) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations provides that
the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time to make a
regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the
case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code
except subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines a regulatory election as
an election whose due date is prescribed by regulations or by a revenue ruling, revenue
procedure, notice, or announcement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

Section 301.9100-3(a) through (c)(1) sets forth rules that the Service generally will use
to determine whether, under the particular facts and circumstances of each situation,
the Commissioner will grant an extension of time for regulatory elections that do not
meet the requirements of section 301.9100-2. Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that
requests for relief subject to this section will be granted when the taxpayer provides the
evidence (including affidavits described in section 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the
satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith,
and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.
PLR-121507-16 4

Section 301.9100-3(b) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably
and in good faith if the taxpayer (i) requests relief under this section before the failure to
make the regulatory election is discovered by the Service; (ii) failed to make the election
because of intervening events beyond the taxpayer's control; (iii) failed to make the
election because, after exercising reasonable diligence (taking into account the
taxpayer's experience and the complexity of the return or issue), the taxpayer was
unaware of the necessity for the election; (iv) reasonably relied on the written advice of
the Service; or (v) reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, including a tax
professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to make, or
advise the taxpayer to make, the election. Moreover, a taxpayer will be deemed not to
have acted in good faith if the taxpayer (i) seeks to alter a return position for which an
accuracy-related penalty has been or could be imposed under section 6662 at the time
the taxpayer requests relief and the new position requires or permits a regulatory
election for which relief is requested; (ii) was informed in all material respects of the
required election and related tax consequences, but chose not to file the election; or (iii)
uses hindsight in requesting relief.

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1) provides that a reasonable extension of time to make a
regulatory election will be granted only when the interests of the government will not be
prejudiced by the granting of relief. Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i) provides that the
interests of the government are prejudiced if granting relief would result in the taxpayer
having a lower tax liability in the aggregate for all taxable years affected by the election
than the taxpayer would have had if the election had been timely made (taking into
account the time value of money). Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) provides that the
interests of the government are ordinarily prejudiced if the taxable year in which the
regulatory election should have been made or any taxable years that would have been
affected by the election had it been timely made are closed by the period of limitations
on assessment under section 6501(a) before the taxpayer's receipt of a ruling granting
relief under this section.

                                    CONCLUSION

Based upon the facts and representations submitted, we conclude that Fund has shown
good cause for granting a reasonable extension of time to make the election under
section 853. Accordingly, Fund has 90 calendar days from the date of this letter to
make the intended election.

This ruling is limited to the timeliness of the filing of the election in section 853(a) of the
Code. This ruling's application is limited to the facts, representations, Code sections,
and regulations cited herein. No opinion is expressed with regard to whether Fund
otherwise qualifies as a RIC under subchapter M of the Code.

No opinion is expressed with regard to whether the tax liability of Fund is not lower in
the aggregate for all years to which the election applies than such tax liability would
PLR-121507-16 5

have been if the election had been timely made (taking into account the time value of
money). Upon audit of the federal income tax returns involved, the director's office will
determine such tax liability for the years involved. If the director's office determines that
such tax liability is lower, that office will determine the federal income tax effect.

Except as specifically provided otherwise, no opinion is expressed on the federal
income tax consequences of the transactions described above.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the terms of a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this
letter is being sent to your authorized representatives.

                                       Sincerely,


                                       Andrea M. Hoffenson__________________
                                       Andrea M. Hoffenson
                                       Branch Chief, Branch 2
                                       Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                       (Financial Institutions and Products)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2017, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.