Estate receives reverse QTIP relief and approval for related trust divisions

Plain-English summary

A revocable trust directed a marital bequest to be split between a GST-exempt marital trust and a nonexempt marital trust based on the decedent's available GST exemption. The estate's attorney did not make that division and mistakenly listed a future charitable lead unitrust on Schedule R instead of making the intended reverse QTIP election for the marital election trust. After the surviving spouse died, a state court ordered the marital trust divided and allowed the charitable lead unitrust to be split according to the two funding sources. The IRS granted 120 days to sever the marital trust and make the reverse QTIP election, and it ruled that the decedent's unused GST exemption would be automatically allocated to the marital election trust. It also approved the charitable lead interests in the two resulting unitrusts and treated the decedent and spouse as the respective GST transferors for the trusts funded from their property. Finally, it ruled that the court-approved changes did not create a taxable gift or cause gain or loss because the beneficiaries' interests remained substantially the same.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: May the estate correct the missed marital-trust severance and reverse QTIP election, and will the related charitable-trust modifications preserve the intended GST, gift, and income tax treatment?
• Outcome: approved on all eight requested rulings, including 120 days for the severance and reverse QTIP election
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 2055, 2056, 2501, 2632, 2652, 2654, and 1001; Treas. Reg. §§ 26.2652-2, 26.2654-1(b), and 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201704005 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 1/27/2017 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 2652.01-02, 2654.00-00,
9100.00-00 Person To Contact:
-------------------------- --------- -----------------
-------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------ -
--------------- Telephone Number:
--------------------------------------------- ---------------------
------------------------------ Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B04
PLR-117547-16
-------------------------------------------- Date:
October 03, 2016

Legend

Decedent ----------------------------
Spouse --------------------------------
Child 1 ---------------------------------
Child 2 ----------------------------
Child 3 -------------------------------------
Date 1 -----------------------
Date 2 -------------------
Date 3 ----------------------
Date 4 ----------------
Date 5 ---------------------
Revocable Trust ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
Marital Trust ----------------------------------------------------------------------
CLUT --------------------------------------------------------------
Charity -----------------------------------------------------------
Attorney -------------------------
County Court -------------------------------------------------------
State ------------
State Statute 1 ------------------------------------------------------
State Statute 2 ------------------------------------------------------
State Statute 3 --------------------------------------------------
a -----------

Dear ----------------:
PLR-117547-16 2

   This letter responds to your authorized representative’s letter dated

May 31, 2016, requesting an extension of time under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of
the Procedure and Administration Regulations to sever a trust into an exempt trust and
a non-exempt trust, to make a "reverse" qualified terminable interest property (QTIP)
election under § 2652(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code for the exempt trust, and
other related rulings.

   The facts submitted and representations made are as follows:

  Decedent executed Revocable Trust on Date 1. Revocable Trust has been

amended several times, most recently on Date 2. Revocable Trust became irrevocable
upon Decedent’s death on Date 3.

   Article IV, Paragraph B, of Revocable Trust provides, in relevant part, that upon

Decedent’s death, if Decedent is survived by Spouse, a pecuniary amount is to be set
aside as a marital bequest (Marital Trust). The marital bequest is to be divided and
allocated by the trustee, as of the date of death of Decedent and according to the fair
market value of the assets constituting the marital bequest at the time or times of
allocation, into two separate trusts, the Marital Election Trust and the Non-exempt
Marital Trust. The trustee is to allocate to the Marital Election Trust a fraction of the
marital bequest the numerator of which is equal to the amount of Decedent’s
generation-skipping transfer (GST) exemption available at Decedent’s death and the
denominator of which is equal to the value of the marital bequest. The remaining
balance of the marital bequest is to be allocated to the Non-exempt Marital Trust.

   Article IV, Paragraph B, further provides that all of the net income of both the

Marital Election Trust and the Non-exempt Marital Trust are to be paid to Spouse at
least quarter-annually. The trustee may pay the principal of the trusts to Spouse for her
health, welfare, support, and reasonable comfort, provided that no payments shall be
made from the Marital Election Trust so long as any property remains in the
Non-exempt Marital Trust. Upon the death of Spouse, all remaining principal is to be
added to a residuary trust (Residuary Trust).

   Article V, Paragraph D, provides, in relevant part, that upon the death of the last

to die of Decedent and Spouse, the Residuary Trust is to be divided as follows: (i) 50
percent of the assets are to fund CLUT, a charitable lead unitrust; (ii) the remaining 50
percent of the assets is to fund trusts for the benefit of Decedent’s children, Child 1,
Child 2, and Child 3.

    Article VII, provides, in relevant part, that CLUT is to pay an annual unitrust

amount to Charity for 25 years. The unitrust amount is to be the percentage of the
entire trust that will produce a remainder interest to Decedent’s grandchildren equal in
value to the amount of GST exemption available to Decedent upon his death.
PLR-117547-16 3

   Decedent died on Date 3, survived by Spouse. Spouse, in her capacity as

personal representative of Decedent’s estate, hired Attorney to prepare Decedent's
estate tax return and to provide advice regarding estate administration matters. In
preparing Decedent’s Form 706, United States Estate (and Generation-Skipping
Transfer) Tax Return, Attorney failed to divide Marital Trust into the Marital Election
Trust and the Non-exempt Marital Trust as required under the terms of Revocable Trust.
Instead, Attorney treated the residuary of Decedent’s gross estate as “net assets
passing to surviving spouse.” It was Attorney’s intention to make a QTIP election with
respect to all of the assets passing to Spouse from Marital Trust and to allocate
Decedent’s unused GST exemption of $a to the assets passing to Spouse in the Marital
Election Trust. However, in preparing the Schedule R, Attorney incorrectly listed CLUT
instead of the Marital Election Trust and as a result failed to properly make a reverse
QTIP election for the Marital Election Trust.

   Spouse died on Date 4. Attorney’s failure to divide Marital Trust into the Marital

Election Trust and Non-exempt Marital Trust and to make a reverse QTIP election for
the Marital Election Trust was discovered shortly after Spouse's death. It is represented
that Decedent has sufficient GST exemption available to allocate to the Marital Election
Trust.

    The current trustees of Marital Trust petitioned County Court to seek a court

order with respect to certain ambiguities in the language of Revocable Trust relating to
the funding of CLUT. On Date 5, County Court ordered, in relevant part, that Marital
Trust is to be divided into two trusts, the Marital Election Trust with assets having a fair
market value of $a (Decedent’s available GST exemption), and the Non-exempt Marital
Trust with the balance of Marital Trust assets. CLUT is to be funded first from the
assets of the Marital Election Trust and then from the assets of the Non-exempt Marital
Trust so that the total assets in CLUT on the date of allocation are equal to one-half of
the combined assets of the Marital Election Trust and Non-exempt Marital Trust just
prior to the date of allocation. The remaining portion of the Non-exempt Marital Trust
will fund the trusts for the benefit of Decedent’s children.

   County Court further ordered that the representatives of Spouse’s estate may

allocate Spouse’s available GST exemption to CLUT. The unitrust percentage being
paid from CLUT will be calculated so that the federal estate tax value of the remainder
will equal the sum of the amount of the GST exemption from Decedent plus the amount
of the GST exemption from Spouse, and CLUT will have an inclusion ratio equal to zero
for GST purposes. Additionally, CLUT may be divided into two charitable lead unitrusts,
one with assets from the Marital Election Trust and one with assets from the
Non-exempt Marital Trust. If CLUT is divided into two charitable lead unitrusts, then
Decedent’s GST exemption will determine the unitrust amount of the charitable lead
unitrust that is funded from the Marital Election Trust and Spouse’s GST exemption will
determine the unitrust amount of the charitable lead unitrust that is funded from the
PLR-117547-16 4

Non-Exempt Marital Trust. County Court’s order is contingent upon a favorable private
letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service

   State Statute 1 provides that after notice to the qualified trust beneficiaries and to

the holders of powers of appointment, a trustee may divide trust property into two or
more separate portions or trusts and allocate property between them if the trusts have
substantially identical terms and conditions or if the result does not impair rights of any
beneficiary or adversely affect achievement of the purposes of the trust.

   State Statute 2 provides that the court may modify the administrative or

dispositive terms of a trust or terminate the trust if, because of circumstances not
anticipated by the settlor, modification or termination will further the settlor's stated
purpose or, if there is no stated purpose, the settlor's probable intention.

    State Statute 3 provides that to achieve the settlor's tax objectives, the court may

modify the terms of a trust in a manner that is not contrary to the settlor's probable
intention. The court may provide that the modification has retroactive effect.

   You have requested the following rulings:

1. An extension of time under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 to sever Marital
   Trust into the Marital Election Trust and the Non-exempt Marital Trust pursuant
   to § 26.2654-1(b) of the Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations.

2. An extension of time under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 to make a “reverse”
   QTIP election under § 2652(a)(3) for the Marital Election Trust.

3. The automatic allocation rules of § 2632(e) will operate to cause the unused
   portion of Decedent's GST exemption to be allocated to the Marital Election
   Trust.

4. Upon division of CLUT into two charitable lead unitrusts, the charitable
   interests of each charitable lead unitrust will qualify as a charitable lead
   interest for purposes of § 2055(e)(2)(B).

5. Upon division of CLUT into two charitable lead unitrusts, the charitable lead
   unitrust funded from the Marital Election Trust will be treated as if Decedent is
   the transferor for GST tax purposes.

6. Upon division of CLUT into two charitable lead unitrusts, the charitable lead
   unitrust funded from the Non-exempt Marital Trust will be treated as if Spouse
   is the transferor for GST tax purposes.
   PLR-117547-16 5

7. The proposed modification of Revocable Trust pursuant to the Date 5 County
   Court order will not be treated as a gift under § 2501.

8. The proposed modification of Revocable Trust pursuant to the Date 5 County
   Court order will not cause recognition of gain or loss under § 1001.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Rulings 1-3

 Section 2001(a) imposes a tax on the transfer of the taxable estate of every

decedent who is a citizen or resident of the United States.

   Section 2044 provides, in part, that the value of the gross estate shall include the

value of any property for which a deduction was allowed with respect to the transfer of
such property to the decedent under § 2056(b)(7) in which the decedent had a
qualifying income interest for life.

   Section 2056(a) provides that, for purposes of the tax imposed by § 2001, the

value of the taxable estate shall, except as limited by § 2056(b), be determined by
deducting from the value of the gross estate an amount equal to the value of any
interest in property which passes or has passed from the decedent to the surviving
spouse, but only to the extent that such interest is included in determining the value of
the gross estate.

    Section 2056(b)(1) provides that where, on the lapse of time, on the occurrence

of an event or contingency, or on the failure of an event or contingency to occur, an
interest passing to the surviving spouse will terminate or fail, no deduction shall be
allowed under this section with respect to such interest -- (A) if an interest in such
property passes or has passed (for less than an adequate and full consideration in
money or money's worth) from the decedent to any person other than such surviving
spouse (or the estate of such spouse); and (B) if by reason of such passing such person
(or his heirs or assigns) may possess or enjoy any part of such property after such
termination or failure of the interest so passing to the surviving spouse; and no
deduction shall be allowed with respect to such interest (even if such deduction is not
disallowed under subparagraphs (A) and (B)) -- (C) if such interest is to be acquired for
the surviving spouse, pursuant to directions of the decedent, by his executor or by the
trustee of a trust.

   Section 2056(b)(7)(A) provides that, in the case of qualified terminable interest

property, for purposes of § 2056(a), such property shall be treated as passing to the
surviving spouse, and for purposes of § 2056(b)(1)(A), no part of such property shall be
treated as passing to any person other than the surviving spouse.
PLR-117547-16 6

   Section 2056(b)(7)(B)(i) defines the term "qualified terminable interest property"

as property: (I) which passes from the decedent; (II) in which the surviving spouse has
a qualifying income interest for life; and (III) to which an election under § 2056(b)(7)
applies.

     Section 2056(b)(7)(B)(ii) provides that the surviving spouse has a qualifying

income interest for life if: (I) the surviving spouse is entitled to all the income from the
property, payable annually or at more frequent intervals, or has a usufruct interest for
life in the property; and (II) no person has a power to appoint any part of the property to
any person other than the surviving spouse.

  Section 2056(b)(7)(B)(v) provides that an election under § 2056(b)(7) with

respect to any property shall be made by the executor on the return of tax imposed by
§ 2001. Such an election, once made, shall be irrevocable.

    Section 20.2056(b)-7(b)(4)(i) of the Estate Tax Regulations provides that, in

general, the election referred to in § 2056(b)(7)(B)(i)(III) and (v) is made on the return of
tax imposed by § 2001 (or § 2101). For purposes of this paragraph, the term "return of
tax imposed by § 2001" means the last estate tax return filed by the executor on or
before the due date of the return, including extensions or, if a timely return is not filed,
the first estate tax return filed by the executor after the due date.

   Section 2601 imposes a tax on every generation-skipping transfer.

Section 2611(a) provides that the term "generation-skipping transfer" means: (1) a
taxable distribution; (2) a taxable termination; and (3) a direct skip.

   Section 2602 provides that the amount of the GST tax is determined by

multiplying the taxable amount by the applicable rate. Section 2641(a) provides that the
term "applicable rate" means, with respect to any GST transfer, the product of the
maximum federal estate tax rate and the inclusion ratio with respect to the transfer.

   Section 2631(a), as in effect on Decedent’s date of death, provides that, for

purposes of determining the inclusion ratio, every individual shall be allowed a
GST exemption of $1,000,000 that may be allocated by the individual (or his executor)
to any property with respect to which the individual is the transferor. Section 2631(b)
provides that any allocation under § 2631(a), once made, shall be irrevocable.

   Section 2632(a) provides that any allocation by an individual of his or her

GST exemption under § 2631(a) may be made at any time on or before the date
prescribed for filing the estate tax return for such individual's estate (determined with
regard to extensions), regardless of whether such a return is required to be filed.

  Section 2632(e)(1) (former § 2632(c)(1) at the time of Decedent’s death)

provides that, in general, any portion of an individual's GST exemption which has not
PLR-117547-16 7

been allocated within the time prescribed by § 2632(a) shall be deemed to be allocated
as follows: (A) first, to property which is the subject of a direct skip occurring at such
individual's death, and (B) second, to trusts with respect to which such individual is the
transferor and from which a taxable distribution or a taxable termination might occur at
or after such individual's death.
Section 26.2632-1(d)(2) provides that a decedent's unused GST exemption is
automatically allocated on the due date for filing the Form 706, or Form 706NA, to the
extent not otherwise allocated by the decedent's executor on or before that date.
Unused GST exemption is allocated pro rata (subject to the rules of § 26.2642-2(b)), on
the basis of the value of the property as finally determined for purposes of chapter 11
(chapter 11 value), first to direct skips treated as occurring at the transferor's death.
The balance, if any, of unused GST exemption is allocated pro rata (subject to the rules
of § 26.2642-2(b)) on the basis of the chapter 11 value of the nonexempt portion of the
trust property to trusts with respect to which a taxable termination may occur or from
which a taxable distribution may be made. No automatic allocation of GST exemption is
made to a trust that will have a new transferor with respect to the entire trust prior to the
occurrence of any GST with respect to the trust. The automatic allocation is
irrevocable.

   Section 2642(a)(1) provides that, generally, the inclusion ratio with respect to any

property transferred in a GST is the excess of one over the applicable fraction
determined for the trust. Section 2642(a)(2) provides that, in general, the applicable
fraction is a fraction the numerator of which is the amount of the GST exemption
allocated to the trust and the denominator of which is the value of the property
transferred to the trust, reduced by the sum of any federal estate tax or state death tax
actually recovered from the trust attributable to such property, and any charitable
deduction allowed under § 2055 or 2522 with respect to such property.

  Section 2652(a)(1) provides that for purposes of chapter 13, the term "transferor"

means: (A) in the case of any property subject to the tax imposed by chapter 11, the
decedent; and (B) in the case of any property subject to the tax imposed by chapter 12,
the donor. An individual shall be treated as transferring any property with respect to
which such individual is the transferor.

    Section 2652(a)(3) provides, in pertinent part, that in the case of any trust with

respect to which a deduction is allowed to the decedent under § 2056(b)(7), the estate
of the decedent may elect to treat all of the property in such trust for GST tax purposes
as if the election to be treated as qualified terminable interest property had not been
made (“reverse” QTIP election).

    Section 26.2652-2(a) provides, in part, that a “reverse” QTIP election is not

effective unless it is made with respect to all of the property in the trust to which the
QTIP election applies. Section 26.2652-2(b) provides that an election under
§ 2652(a)(3) is made on the return on which the QTIP election is made.
PLR-117547-16 8

    Section 26.2654-1(b)(1) provides, in part, that the severance of a trust that is

included in the transferor's gross estate (or created under the transferor's will) into two
or more trusts is recognized for purposes of chapter 13 if the trust is severed pursuant
to a direction in the governing instrument providing that the trust is to be divided upon
the death of the transferor and the terms of the new trusts provide in the aggregate for
the same succession of interests and beneficiaries as are provided in the original
instrument and the severance occurs prior to the date prescribed for filing the federal
estate tax return (including extensions actually granted) for the estate of the transferor
and the new trusts are severed on a fractional basis.

  Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a

reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3
to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months
except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal
Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

  Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards used to determine whether to grant

an extension of time to make an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation
(and not expressly provided by statute).

   Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer

provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the
taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice
the interests of the government.

  Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted

reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax
professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax
professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

   Under the terms of Revocable Trust, CLUT was to be formed and funded after

the death of the last to die of Decedent and Spouse. However, on Decedent’s
Form 706, Attorney allocated Decedent’s available GST exemption to CLUT, a trust that
would not be created until after Spouse’s death. Decedent could not allocate his GST
exemption to a trust that did not exist; therefore, Decedent’s GST exemption is still
available.

   Based on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that the

requirements of § 301.9100-3 are satisfied. Therefore, Decedent's estate is granted an
extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to sever Marital Trust into the
Marital Election Trust and the Non-exempt Marital Trust and to make a reverse QTIP
election with respect to the Marital Election Trust. Further, we rule that the automatic
allocation rules of § 2632(e) apply to automatically allocate Decedent's unused GST
PLR-117547-16 9

exemption to the Marital Election Trust.

    The reverse QTIP election should be made on a supplemental Form 706 for

Decedent. The Form 706 should be filed with the Cincinnati Service Center at the
following address: Internal Revenue Service Center, Cincinnati, OH 45999. A copy of
this letter should be attached to the supplemental Form 706. A copy is enclosed for this
purpose.

Ruling 4

    Section 2055(a)(2) provides that for purposes of the federal estate tax, the value

of the taxable estate shall be determined by deducting from the value of the gross
estate the amount of all bequests, legacies, devises or transfers to or for the use of any
corporation organized and operated exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific,
literary, or educational purposes, no part of the net earnings of which inures to the
benefit of any private stockholder or individual.

  Under § 20.2055-2(a), the amount passing to charity must be ascertainable and

determinable as of the date of death. Similarly, under § 20.2055-2(b)(1), if the trustee is
empowered to divert the property or fund, in whole or in part, to a noncharitable
purpose, the deduction is limited to that portion, if any, of the property which is exempt
from an exercise of the power.

   Under § 2055(e)(2), the estate tax charitable deduction is not allowable where an

interest in property (other than an interest described in § 170(f)(3)(B)) passes or has
passed from the decedent to a person, or for a use, described in § 2055(a), and an
interest (other than an interest which is extinguished upon the decedent's death) in the
same property passes or has passed (for less than an adequate and full consideration
in money or money's worth) from the decedent to a person, or for a use, not described
in § 2055(a), unless—

   (A) in the case of a remainder interest, such interest is in a trust which is a

charitable remainder annuity trust or a charitable remainder unitrust (described in § 664)
or a pooled income fund (described in § 642(c)(5)), or

   (B) in the case of any other interest, such interest is in the form of a guaranteed

annuity or is a fixed percentage distributed yearly of the fair market value of the property
(to be determined yearly).

  Under § 20.2055-2(e)(1)(i), in the case of decedents dying after December 31,

1969, where an interest in property passes from the decedent for charitable purposes
and an interest in the same property passes from the decedent for private purposes, no
deduction is allowed under § 2055(a) for the value of the interest passing for charitable
purposes unless the interest is a “deductible interest.”
PLR-117547-16 10

    Under § 20.2055-2(e)(2)(vii)(a), the term “deductible interest” includes a unitrust

interest. A “unitrust interest” is a right to receive payment, not less often than annually,
of a fixed percentage of the net fair market value, determined annually, of the property
which funds the unitrust interest. The unitrust interest may be paid for a specified term,
or for the life or lives of named individuals, each of whom must be living at the creation
of the trust.

   Under § 20.2055-2(e)(2)(vii)(b), a charitable interest is a unitrust interest only if it

is a unitrust interest in every respect. Under § 20.2055-2(e)(2)(vii)(d), where a unitrust
interest is in trust, the instrument may provide that income of the trust in excess of the
amount required to pay the unitrust interest shall be paid to or for the use of a charity.
Nevertheless, the amount of the deduction under § 2055 is limited to the fair market
value of the unitrust interest. Under § 20.2055-2(f)(2)(v), the present value of a unitrust
interest is determined by subtracting the present value of all interests in the transferred
property other than the unitrust interest from the fair market value of the transferred
property.

   In this case, under the law of State, CLUT may be divided into two charitable

lead unitrusts. Under the law of State, a court may modify the administrative or
dispositive terms of a trust, because of circumstances not anticipated by the settlor. In
addition, the proposed modification will further Decedent’s intent to maximize the utility
of the GST exemption amount when determining the unitrust amount of CLUT. Under
the modification, Decedent’s GST exemption will determine the unitrust amount of the
charitable lead unitrust that is funded from the Marital Election Trust and Spouse’s GST
exemption will determine the unitrust amount of the charitable lead unitrust that is
funded from the Non-Exempt Marital Trust.

   Each charitable lead unitrust will be required to pay a fixed percentage of the

assets of such trust, determined annually. The unitrust interest will be paid at least
annually for a term of 25 years. Accordingly, based on the facts submitted and
representations made, we conclude that after the division of CLUT into two charitable
lead unitrusts, the charitable interests of each charitable lead unitrust will qualify as a
charitable lead interest.

Rulings 5-6

   It was Attorney’s intention to make a QTIP election with respect to all of the

assets passing to Spouse from Marital Trust and to allocate Decedent’s unused GST
exemption, $a, to the assets passing to Spouse in the Marital Election Trust.
Accordingly under § 2044, the assets of Marital Trust are included in the gross estate of
Spouse. With the granting of relief under § 301.9100-3 under this ruling request, Marital
Trust is divided into Marital Election Trust and Non-exempt Marital Trust. Both of these
trusts will be included in Spouse’s gross estate under § 2044 for estate tax purposes.
PLR-117547-16 11

    Spouse will also be treated as the transferor, under § 2652(a)(1), of the

Non-exempt Marital Trust for GST tax purposes. Some of the assets of the Non-exempt
Marital Trust will fund a charitable lead unitrust and the remaining assets will fund trusts
for the benefit of Decedent’s children. Accordingly, based on the facts submitted and
representations made, we conclude that Spouse will be treated as the transferor for the
charitable lead unitrust and the trusts for the benefit of Decedent’s children for GST tax
purposes.

   Decedent will be the transferor of the Marital Election Trust for GST tax

purposes. In accordance with the proposed modification of the trust, the Marital
Election Trust will fund a charitable lead unitrust. Accordingly, based on the facts
submitted and representations made, we conclude that Decedent will be treated as the
transferor of this charitable lead unitrust for GST tax purposes.

Ruling 7

    Section 2501(a) imposes a tax for each calendar year on the transfer of property

by gift during the calendar year by any individual.

   Section 2511(a) provides that the gift tax applies whether the transfer is in trust

or otherwise, whether the gift is direct or indirect, and whether the property is real or
personal, tangible or intangible.

   Section 2512(a) provides that if the gift is made in property, the value thereof at

the date of the gift is considered the amount of the gift.

   Section 2512(b) provides that where property is transferred for less than

adequate and full consideration in money or money's worth, then the amount by which
the value of the property exceeded the value of the consideration is deemed to be a gift,
and is included in computing the amount of gifts made during the calendar year.

    In this case, the beneficiaries of Revocable Trust will have the same interests

after the proposed modification that they had prior to the modification. Because the
beneficial interests of the beneficiaries are substantially the same, no transfer of
property will be deemed to occur as a result of the modification. Accordingly, based on
the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the proposed
modification of Revocable Trust pursuant to the Date 5 County Court order will not be
treated as a gift under § 2501.

Ruling 8

   Section 61(a)(3) and (15) provides that gross income includes gains derived from

dealings in property and income from an interest in an estate or trust.
PLR-117547-16 12

  Section 1001(a) provides that the gain from the sale or other disposition of

property shall be the excess of the amount realized over the adjusted basis provided in
§ 1011 for determining gain, and the loss shall be the excess of the adjusted basis
provided in § 1011 for determining loss over the amount realized.

   Section 1001(b) provides that the amount realized from the sale or other

disposition of property shall be the sum of any money received plus the fair market
value of the property (other than money) received. Under § 1001(c) the entire amount
of gain or loss on the sale or exchange of property shall be recognized, except as
otherwise provided.

   Section 1.1001-1(a) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that except as

otherwise provided in subtitle A of the Code, the gain or loss realized from the exchange
of property for other property differing materially either in kind or in extent, is treated as
income or as loss sustained.

   An exchange of property results in the realization of gain or loss under § 1001 if

the properties exchanged are materially different. Cottage Savings Association v.
Commissioner, 499 U.S. 554 (1991). A material difference exists when the exchanged
properties embody legal entitlements different in kind or extent or if they confer different
rights and powers. Id. at 565.

   Rev. Rul. 69-486, 1969-2 C.B. 159, involved two beneficiaries of a trust who by

mutual agreement, requested that the trustee distribute all of the trust corpus consisting
of notes to one of the beneficiaries and all of the trust corpus consisting of common
stock to the other beneficiary. The trust instrument as well as local law was silent
regarding whether the trustee had the authority to make such a non-pro rata distribution
of property in kind. Because the trustee was not specifically authorized to make an
allocation of specific property in kind, the beneficiaries were treated as having an
absolute right to a ratable in-kind distribution. Rev. Rul. 69-486 treated the beneficiaries
as receiving the notes and common stock pro rata, followed by an exchange between
the beneficiaries giving all of the common stock to one and all of the notes to the other.
Because, in substance, an exchange between the beneficiaries was deemed to occur,
Rev. Rul. 69-486 held that the beneficiaries recognized gain under §§ 1001 and 1002.

   The present case is distinguishable from Rev. Rul. 69-486 because the trust

instrument allows for non-pro rata distributions. Furthermore, the division of Marital
Trust into the Marital Election Trust and the Non-exempt Marital Trust serves primarily
to effect the terms of the trust agreement and does not change the interests of the
remainder beneficiaries. The beneficiaries of Revocable Trust will have the
same interests after the proposed modification that they had prior to the modification.
Because the beneficial interests of the beneficiaries are substantially the same, no
transfer of property will be deemed to occur as a result of the modification. Accordingly,
PLR-117547-16 13

based on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that the proposed
modification of Revocable Trust pursuant to the Date 5 County Court order will not
constitute a taxable disposition of trust assets for federal income tax purposes and the
trusts and beneficiaries will not realize gain under § 1001 as a result of the division.

  In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, we have sent a

copy of this letter to your authorized representatives.

   Except as expressly provided herein, we neither express nor imply any opinion

concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter.

  The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and

representations submitted by the Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.

  This ruling is directed only to the Taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)

provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

                                  Sincerely,


                                  Associate Chief Counsel
                                  Passthroughs and Special Industries



                                  Leslie H. Finlow
                            By:   Leslie H. Finlow
                                  Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 4
                                  Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                  (Passthroughs and Special Industries)

Enclosures
Copy for § 6110 purposes
Copy of this letter