🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 201652006 Released December 23, 2016 Approved

Company granted time for two research expenditure elections

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2016
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A parent company used the optional 10-year writeoff for research and experimental expenditures on consolidated returns for two tax years but failed to attach the required election statements. It represented that the omissions were inadvertent, that it acted reasonably and in good faith, and that late elections would not prejudice the government. The IRS granted 120 days to make separate section 59(e) elections for the two years. The ruling did not decide whether the expenditures qualified under section 174 or whether the amounts were correct.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the company receive additional time to make separate section 59(e) elections for research expenditures in two tax years?
  • Outcome: approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 59(e), 174(a); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.59-1(b), 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201652006 [Third Party Communication:
Release Date: 12/23/2016 Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Index Number: 9100.02-00, 9100.02-
03 Person To Contact:
------------------------, ID No. -------------
----------------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:



  • ---------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
    ----------------------------------- CC:PSI:B06
    ---------------------------- PLR-111911-16
    Date:
    In Re: -------------------------------------------- September 7, 2016

LEGEND

Taxpayer = ----------------------------------------------------
------------------------

Taxable Year A = ---------------------------------------

Taxable Year B = ---------------------------------------

a = ----------------

b = ----------------

Dear -------------:

   This is in response to a letter dated March 23, 2016, submitted on behalf of

Taxpayer, parent of an affiliated group filing consolidated federal income tax returns,
requesting extensions of time under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the Procedure
and Administration Regulations to make separate late elections under § 59(e) of the
Internal Revenue Code (Code) for Taxable Year A and Taxable Year B, with respect to
research and experimental expenditures under § 174(a) paid and incurred in these
years.

  According to the facts and information submitted, Taxpayer timely filed

consolidated federal income tax returns for Taxable Year A and Taxable Year B. On
the consolidated federal income tax return for Taxable Year A, Taxpayer used the
optional 10-year writeoff of certain tax preferences under § 59(e) to deduct ratably
research and experimental expenditures in the amount of $a, paid and incurred in
Taxable Year A. On the consolidated federal income tax return for Taxable Year B,
PLR-111911-16 2

Taxpayer used the optional 10-year writeoff of certain tax preferences under § 59(e) to
deduct ratably research and experimental expenditures in the amount of $b, paid and
incurred in Taxable Year B. Although Taxpayer intended to make separate elections
under § 59(e) for Taxable Year A and Taxable Year B, consistent with the treatment of
research and experimental expenditures on the returns, it inadvertently failed to do so.

    Taxpayer represented that, in requesting extensions of time to make separate

late elections under § 59(e) for Taxable Year A and Taxable Year B, it acted reasonably
and in good faith and, further, there is no prejudice to the interests of the Government.

  Section 174(a) provides, in general, that a taxpayer may treat research and

experimental expenditures which are paid or incurred by him during the taxable year in
connection with his trade or business as expenses which are not chargeable to capital
account. The expenditures so treated are allowed as a deduction.

   Section 59(e)(1) allows a taxpayer, in general, to deduct ratably over the 10-year

period any qualified expenditure to which an election under § 59(e) applies, beginning
with the taxable year in which such expenditure was made.

  Section 59(e)(2)(B) includes in the definition of “qualified expenditure” any

amount which, but for an election under § 59(e), would have been allowable as a
deduction for the taxable year in which paid or incurred under § 174(a) (relating to
research and experimental expenditures).

  Section 59(e)(3) specifically prohibits the deduction of the qualified expenditures

under any other section of the Code if the option under § 59(e) is elected.

  Section 59(e)(4)(A) provides that an election under § 59(e)(1) may be made with

respect to any portion of any qualified expenditure.

  Section 59(e)(4)(B) provides that an election made under § 59(e) may be

revoked only with the consent of the Secretary.

   Section 1.59-1(b)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations prescribes the time and

manner of making the election under § 59(e). According to § 1.59-1(b)(1), an election
under § 59(e) shall only be made by attaching a statement to the taxpayer’s income tax
return (or amended return) for the taxable year in which the amortization of the qualified
expenditures subject to the § 59(e) election begins. The taxpayer must file the
statement no later than the date prescribed by law for filing the taxpayer’s original
income tax return (including any extensions of time) for the taxable year in which the
amortization of the qualified expenditures subject to the § 59(e) election begins and
include certain required information.

  Section 1.59-1(b)(2) provides, in part, that a taxpayer may make an election

PLR-111911-16 3

under § 59(e) with respect to any portion of any qualified expenditure paid or incurred
by the taxpayer in the taxable year to which the election applies. An election under
§ 59(e) must be for a specific dollar amount and the amount subject to an election under
§ 59(e) may not be made by reference to a formula.

  Section 301.9100-1(a) provides that the regulations under this section and

§§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 establish the standards the Commissioner will use to
determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election. An
extension of time is available for elections that a taxpayer is otherwise eligible to make.
However, the granting of an extension of time is not a determination that the taxpayer is
otherwise eligible to make the election.

   Section 301.9100-1(b) provides that the term “regulatory election” includes an

election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the Federal Register.

   Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner may grant a reasonable

extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a
regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the
case of taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code, except subtitles E, G,
H, and I.

   Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain

elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides rules for requesting extensions of time for
regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

    Section 301.9100-3 provides that requests for relief subject to this section will be

granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting
relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

    Based solely on the information submitted and representations made, we

conclude that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied.
Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this
letter to make separate elections under § 59(e) for Taxable Year A and Taxable Year B
to deduct ratably over the 10-year period research and experimental expenditures paid
and incurred in these years.

    The election under § 59(e) must comply with the requirements of § 1.59-1(b).

Section 1.59-1(b) requires, in part, that an election under § 59(e) be made by attaching
a statement to the taxpayer’s income tax return (or amended return) for the taxable year
in which the amortization of the qualified expenditures subject to the election under
§ 59(e) begins. The statement must include the taxpayer’s name, address, and taxpayer
identification number, and the type and amount of qualified expenditures identified in
PLR-111911-16 4

§ 59(e)(2) that the taxpayer elects to deduct ratably over the applicable period
described in § 59(e)(1).

    In making the elections, Taxpayer should also attach copies of this letter to the

amended returns for Taxable Year A and Taxable Year B. We have enclosed copies of
this letter (one for each election) for that purpose.

   Except as specifically set forth above, we express no opinion concerning the

federal tax consequences of the facts described above. In particular, we express or
imply no opinion on whether Taxpayer satisfies the requirements of § 59(e) and the
regulations thereunder, or whether the expenditures at issue are research and
experimental expenditures under § 174(a), or whether the amounts of the research and
experimental expenditures at issue are correct.

  This letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)

provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

  The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information submitted and

representations made by Taxpayer and Taxpayer’s representatives and accompanied
by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. Although this office
has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is
subject to verification on examination.

                                      Sincerely,

                                      Associate Chief Counsel
                                      (Passthroughs and Special Industries)


                                      By: _____________________________
                                      Jian H. Grant
                                      Assistant to the Branch Chief, Branch 6
                                      Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                      (Passthroughs and Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)

   Copy of this letter
   Copy for § 6110 purposes

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2016, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.