Group granted time to waive loss carryback
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A consolidated group intended to waive the entire carryback period for a consolidated net operating loss, and its returns were filed consistently with that intent, but the required election statement was not validly filed. The group and a related former group represented that they had not carried the loss back and would continue reporting consistently with the election. The IRS found that the parent acted reasonably and in good faith and granted 60 days to file the election. Relief was conditioned on the groups' aggregate tax liability not being lower than it would have been with a timely election.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May the parent receive additional time to elect to relinquish the entire carryback period for its consolidated net operating loss?
- Outcome: approved
- Key authorities: IRC § 172(b)(3); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1502-21(b)(3)(i), 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201651011 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 12/16/2016 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 1502.21-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------- -----------------------, ID No. -------------------
--------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
-------------------------------- ----------------------
--------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
---------------------------------------- CC:CORP:B03
PLR-118150-16
Date:
September 12, 2016
Legend
Parent = ----------------------------------
Old Parent = --------------------------
Sub 1 = --------------------------
Sub 2 = --------------
Sub 3 = -----------------------------------------------------
Date 1 = ------------------------
Date 2 = ---------------------------
Date 3 = ----------------------------
Company Official = --------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tax Professional = -----------------------------
Dear -------------:
PLR-118150-16 2
This letter responds to a letter dated June 6, 2016, submitted on behalf of Parent,
requesting an extension of time under §§ 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 of the
Procedure and Administration Regulations to make an election. The extension is being
requested for Parent to make an election under § 1.1502-21(b)(3)(i) to relinquish the
entire carryback period for the Parent consolidated group's (“Parent Group”)
consolidated net operating loss ("CNOL") for the tax year ending Date 2 (the "Election").
Additional information was submitted in letters dated August 8, 2016 and September 7,
2016. The material information submitted for consideration is summarized below.
On Date 1, Parent purchased Old Parent, the parent of another consolidated group that
included Sub 1, Sub 2, and Sub 3 (“Old Parent Group”). Parent Group sustained a
CNOL in the tax year ending on Date 2. An election to relinquish the carryback period
for its consolidated group's CNOL for the tax year ending Date 2 was due on Date 3. All
returns for Parent Group and Old Parent Group were filed consistent with a valid
election having been made. However, for various reasons, a valid election was not filed.
After Date 3, the date that the Election was due, it was discovered that a valid election
was not filed. Subsequently, this request was submitted for an extension of time to file a
valid election.
Parent has represented: (1) Parent Group has not, and will not, carry any portion of the
CNOL for the tax year ending Date 2 to a prior consolidated return year of Parent
Group; (2) No member of the consolidated group of which Parent was the common
parent for the tax year ending Date 2, other that Old Parent, Sub 1, Sub 2, and Sub 3,
had a separate return year, within the meaning of § 1.1502-1(e), at any time during the
carryback period; (3) All of Old Parent, Sub 1, Sub 2, and Sub 3’s separate return years
in the carryback period were years in which they were members of the Old Parent
Group; and (4) None of the CNOL for the tax year ending Date 2 was attributable to Old
Parent, Sub 2, or Sub 3. Old Parent has represented that none of the CNOL for the tax
year ending Date 2 attributable to Sub 1 has been carried back, or will be carried back,
to a separate return year, within the meaning of § 1.1502-1(e), of Sub 1. Parent and Old
Parent represent that they have filed and will file all returns consistent with the election
to relinquish the entire carryback period of the CNOL.
Parent has further represented that Parent is not seeking to alter a return position for
which an accuracy-related penalty has been or could have been imposed under § 6662.
Section 1.1502-21(b)(3)(i) provides that a consolidated group may make an irrevocable
election under § 172(b)(3) to relinquish the entire carryback period with respect to a
CNOL for any consolidated return year. The election is made in a separate statement
entitled "THIS IS AN ELECTION UNDER § 1.1502-21(b)(3)(i) TO WAIVE THE ENTIRE
CARRYBACK PERIOD PURSUANT TO SECTION 172(b)(3) FOR THE [insert
consolidated return year] CNOLs OF THE CONSOLIDATED GROUP OF WHICH [insert
name and employer identification number of common parent] IS THE COMMON
PLR-118150-16 3
PARENT." Section 1.1502-21(b)(3)(i) also provides that the statement must be filed with
the group's income tax return for the consolidated return year in which the loss arises.
Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable
extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than
six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the
Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.
Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will
use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election.
Section 301.9100-1(a). Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for
making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making
regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2. Requests for
relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to
establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably
and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the
government. Section 301.9100-3(a).
In this case, the time for filing the Election is fixed by the regulations (i.e., § 1.1502-
21(b)(3)(i)). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under § 301.9100-
3 to grant an extension of time for Parent to file the Election, provided Parent
establishes it acted reasonably and in good faith, the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1
and 301.9100-3 are satisfied, and granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the
government.
Information, affidavits, and representations submitted by Parent, Company Official, and
Tax Professional explain the circumstances that resulted in the failure to timely file a
valid election. The information establishes that the request for relief was filed before the
failure to timely make the Election was discovered by the Internal Revenue Service. See
§ 301.9100-3(b)(1)(i).
Based on the facts and information submitted, including the representations made, we
conclude that Parent has shown it acted reasonably and in good faith, the requirements
of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 are satisfied, and granting relief will not prejudice the
interests of the government. Accordingly, an extension of time is granted under
§ 301.9100-1, until 60 days from the date on this letter, for Parent to file the Election
with respect to the relinquishment of the entire carryback period for the CNOL for the
tax year ending Date 2, as described above.
The above extension of time is conditioned on the taxpayers' (Parent Group’s and Old
Parent Group’s) tax liability (if any) being not lower, in the aggregate, for all years to
which the Election applies, than it would have been if the Election had been timely
made (taking into account the time value of money). No opinion is expressed as to the
PLR-118150-16 4
taxpayers' tax liability for the years involved. A determination thereof will be made by the
Director's office upon audit of the Federal income tax returns involved.
Parent must file the Election in accordance with § 1.1502-21(b)(3)(i). Parent Group's
return for the tax year ending Date 2, having been filed consistent with a valid election
having been made, must be amended to attach the election statement required by
§ 1.1502-21(b)(3)(i). A copy of this letter must be attached to the election statement.
Alternatively, if the Parent Group files its returns electronically, Parent may satisfy this
requirement by attaching a statement to its return that provides the date and control
number of this letter ruling.
We express no opinion as to the tax effects or consequences of filing the Election late
under the provisions of any other section of the Code and regulations, or as to the tax
treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or resulting from, filing the Election
late that are not specifically set forth in the above ruling.
For purposes of granting relief under § 301.9100-3, we relied on certain statements and
representations made by Parent, Company Official, Tax Professional. However, the
Director should verify all essential facts. Moreover, notwithstanding that an extension is
granted under § 301.9100-3 to file the Election, penalties and interest that would
otherwise be applicable, if any, continue to apply.
This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides
that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Pursuant to the power of attorney on file in the office, copies of this letter are being sent
to your authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
_Ken Cohen_____________________
Ken Cohen
Chief, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2016, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.