Partnership interest acquisition treated as an expansion of an active business
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A corporate group requested a ruling on one active-business issue affecting a proposed section 355 distribution. The distributing corporation had held a significant interest in one partnership conducting the relevant business for at least five years and later acquired an additional interest through another partnership. The IRS ruled that the later acquisition was an expansion of the distributing corporation's existing business under Treasury Regulation § 1.355-3(b)(3)(ii), not the acquisition of a new or different business. That conclusion supported the five-year active-business analysis for the proposed transaction. The ruling expressly did not determine the transaction's overall tax consequences.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Did the later partnership-interest acquisition expand an existing active business rather than create a new or different business for section 355 purposes?
- Outcome: Approved.
- Key authorities: IRC § 355; Treas. Reg. § 1.355-3(b)(3)(ii).
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201643008 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 10/21/2016 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 355.00-00, 355.03-00,
355.03-01 Person To Contact:
-----------------, ID No. ------- -----------
--------------------- Telephone Number:
----------------- --------------------
----------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
--------------------------------------- CC:CORP:2
PLR-108933-16
Date:
July 22, 2016
Legend
Distributing = ----------------------
Controlled = ------
Sub 1 = --------------------------------------
Sub 2 = -------------------
Sub 3 = -------------------------------
LLC 1 = -------------------------------
LLC 2 = -------------------------
LLC 3 = ---------------------------------------
PLR-108933-16 2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State A = --------------
Business A = ---------------------------------------
a = --------
b = ------
c = ------
d = ----
e = ------
f = ------
g = ------
Date 1 = ----------------------
Date 2 = ----------------------
Year 1 = -------
Dear ------------------:
This letter responds to your March 18, 2016 request, submitted by your authorized
representatives, for a ruling under section 355(b). The information provided in that letter
and later correspondence is summarized below.
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by penalties of perjury statements
executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material
submitted in support of the request for ruling, it is subject to verification on examination.
This letter is issued pursuant to section 6.03 of Rev. Proc. 2016-1, 2016-1 I.R.B. 18,
regarding one or more significant issues under section 355. The ruling contained in this
letter only addresses one or more discrete legal issues involved in the transaction. This
Office expresses no opinion as to the overall tax consequences of the transactions
described in this letter or as to any issue not specifically addressed by the ruling below.
PLR-108933-16 3
FACTS
Distributing is a State A corporation and the common parent of an affiliated group of
corporations that file a consolidated federal income tax return (the “Distributing Group”).
Distributing wholly owns Sub 1 and Sub 2. In addition, Distributing directly and
indirectly owns approximately a percent of LLC 1 (at least a one-third interest), an entity
that is treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes and is involved in
Business A and owns directly approximately b percent of LLC 2, an entity that is treated
as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Sub 1 wholly owns LLC 3, an
entity that is treated as an entity that is disregarded as separate from Sub 1 for federal
income tax purposes. Sub 2 directly owns all of the stock of Sub 3. LLC 3 and Sub 3
own approximately c and d percent of LLC 2, respectively.
Distributing acquired an e percent (at least a one-third) interest in LLC 1 on Date 1,
which is at least 5 years prior to the date of the Proposed Transaction (defined below).
In addition, Distributing acquired an f percent (less than one-third) interest in LLC 2 in
Year 1. On Date 2, Distributing acquired a g percent interest in LLC 2. Since Date 2,
Distributing has directly or indirectly owned the entire interest in LLC 2.
PROPOSED TRANSACTION
Distributing has proposed the following series of transactions (together constituting the
“Proposed Transaction”):
(i) Distributing will create a new corporation, Controlled.
(ii) Sub 3 will distribute its entire interest in LLC 2 to Sub 2.
(iii) Sub 2 will distribute the interest in LLC 2 it received from Sub 3 in step ii to
Distributing.
(iv) In actual or constructive exchange for Controlled Stock, Distributing will contribute to
Controlled (1) the LLC 2 member interest it received from Sub 2 in step iii; (2) the LLC 2
member interest that it directly owned in LLC 2 prior to step iii; and (3) 100 percent of
the issued and outstanding stock of Sub 1.
(v) Parent will distribute all of its stock of Controlled to its shareholders.
REPRESENTATIONS
The Distributing Group makes the following representations:
PLR-108933-16 4
(a) Distributing owns, and has owned since Date 1, a “significant interest” (within the
meaning of Rev. Rul. 2007-42, 2007-28 I.R.B. 44) in LLC 1.
(b) LLC 1 has been engaged in the active conduct of Business A throughout the
period following Distributing's acquisition of its interest in LLC 1 on Date 1.
RULING
Based upon the facts and information submitted and the representations made, we rule
that the Distributing Group's acquisition of a g percent interest in LLC 2 on Date 2
constitutes an expansion of Distributing's Business A (within the meaning of Treas. Reg.
§ 1.355-3(b)(3)(ii)) and does not constitute the acquisition of a new or different
business. Treas. Reg. § 1.355-3(b)(3)(ii) and Rev. Rul. 2007-42, 2007-28 I.R.B. 44,
Rev. Rul. 2003-38, 2003-17 I.R.B. 811, and Rev. Rul. 2003-18, 2003-7 I.R.B. 467.
CAVEATS
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax treatment of the Proposed Transaction under any provision of the Code and
regulations or the tax treatment of any condition existing at the time of, or effects
resulting from the Proposed Transaction that is not specifically covered by the above
rulings.
PROCEDURAL STATEMENTS
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.
A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number (PLR-
108933-16) of the letter ruling.
Sincerely,
Gerald B. Fleming
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 2
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2016, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.