Prior trust-owner ruling revoked because of the grantor's reversion
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS revoked the first conclusion of an earlier private letter ruling about who owned a trust for federal income tax purposes. The trust would terminate and return its property to the grantor if both children stopped serving on the distribution committee or fewer than two members remained. Section 673(c) required valuing the reversion by assuming discretion was exercised as favorably as possible for the grantor. Assuming all committee members resigned immediately after funding made the reversion worth 100 percent of the trust. The IRS therefore concluded that the grantor was treated as owner of the entire trust under section 671 and revoked the inconsistent prior ruling.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Did the trust's termination and return provision create a reversionary interest that made the grantor the trust owner?
- Outcome: Revocation.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 671, 673, and 678.
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201642019
Release Date: 10/14/2016
Index Number: 671.00-00, 673.00-00
Person To Contact:
---------------------------- ---------------------------
----------------------------------------------- -------------------------------
---------------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------- -------
- Refer Reply To:
- CC:PSI:B03
PLR-117280-16
Date:
LEGEND June 20, 2016
X = --------------------
Trust = -------------------------------------------------
Re: ------------------------------------------------------------
Dear ----------:
This letter hereby revokes the conclusion of Ruling 1 of PLR-140408-13, dated
February 24, 2014, which was previously issued by this office to X.
In Ruling 1 of PLR-140408-13, the Internal Revenue Service concluded that
during the period Distribution Committee members are serving, no portion of the items
of income, deductions and credits against tax of the Trust will be included in computing
the taxable income, deductions and credits of X under § 671 or any Distribution
Committee member under § 678(a).
Since issuing this letter ruling, the Service has determined that Ruling 1 of
PLR-140408-13 is not in accord with the current views of the Service. After
reconsideration, we have concluded that the provision in Trust that provides that in the
event that both the children are no longer serving as members of the Distribution
Committee or if there are fewer than two serving members, the trust property will be
distributed to the grantor and the trust shall terminate constitutes a reversionary interest
under § 673. Section 673(a) provides in general that the grantor shall be treated as the
owner of any portion of a trust in which he has a reversionary interest in either the
corpus or the income therefrom, if, as of the inception of that portion of the trust, the
PLR-117280-16 2
value of such interest exceeds 5% of the value of such portion. Under § 673(c), the
value of the reversion must be calculated assuming the maximum exercise of discretion
in the grantor’s favor, which under these facts would be the immediate resignation of all
the Distribution Committee members immediately after trust funding, causing the
reversionary interest to be worth 100% and causing X to be treated as the owner of the
entire trust for purposes of § 671.
Accordingly, Ruling 1 of PLR-140408-13 is revoked. You may request a
conference to discuss this matter further.
In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a
copy of this letter ruling to your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
Bradford R. Poston
Senior Counsel, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)
Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy of this letter for section 6110 purposes
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2016, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.