🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Determination Letter 201641030 Released October 7, 2016 Approved Transcribed from scan

IRS approves a science fellowship grant program

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2016
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A private foundation sought advance approval for a fellowship program intended to increase women's participation in science and engineering at universities in a foreign country. Eligible applicants were recent female postdoctoral researchers from that country who had financial need and had been accepted to continue research at a university abroad. An independent expert committee would use research quality, proposed work, and long-term goals to select recipients, while insiders and their relatives were excluded. Recipients had to sign grant agreements, submit approved progress reports, and return misused funds. The IRS approved the procedures under section 4945(g)(3), so grants made under the program as described would not be taxable expenditures.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did the foundation's procedures for awarding and supervising its science and engineering fellowships satisfy the advance-approval rules?
  • Outcome: Approved, assuming the foundation conducts the program as proposed.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 74(b), 117(a), 170(b)(1)(A)(ii), and 4945(g); Treas. Reg. § 53.4945-4(c).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
P.O. Box 2508
Cincinnati, OH 45201

Release Number: 201641030
Release Date: 10/7/2017 Employer Identification Number:

Date: July 13, 2016
Contact person - ID number:

Contact telephone number:

LEGEND UIL:

Y = Country 4945.04-04
z = Amount

Dear

You asked for advance approval of your educational grant procedures under Internal
Revenue Code section 4945(g) (3). This approval is required because you are a private
foundation that is exempt from federal income tax.

Our determination

We approved your procedures for awarding educational grants. Based on the
information you submitted, and assuming you will conduct your program as proposed, we
determined that your procedures for awarding educational grants meet the requirements
of Code section 4945(g)(3). As a result, expenditures you make under these procedures
won't be taxable.

Description of your request
Your letter indicates that you will operate a fellowship program.

You indicate that the purpose of the program is to provide fellowship grants to individuals
to help increase gender diversity in universities in Y in the areas of science and
engineering by supplementing the post-doctoral research stipend offered at the university
where they have been accepted to research. You plan to award z new fellowships each
year and the amount of the stipends are varied depending upon the available funds.

The applicants must meet the following criteria: (a) are post-doctoral researchers who are
residents of Y, (b) demonstrate financial needs, (c) are women, (d) received their PhD
from a Y research university in the last three years in the fields of mathematics,
computing sciences, or engineering, and (e) have been accepted to continue their
research at a university outside of Y.

Individuals who are employed by you, employed by organizations controlled by your
director(s), members of your Board of Directors, or related by blood or marriage to
employees or your directors or organizations controlled by your director(s), will not be
eligible for the grants.

Applicants will be assessed based on (a) the quality of completed research, (b) the
relevance of their post-doctoral research plan, and (c) their long term goals with respect
to their research work. Preference will be given to candidates who intend to become a
professor at a university in Y in the fields of mathematics, computing, or engineering after
the completion of their fellowship.

The fellowship grant may be extended for one (1) more year based on progress made on
the grantee’s research plan.

You will require each recipient to sign a grant agreement before any funds are disbursed.
You will require periodic reports as specified in the grant agreement and will monitor and
evaluate the expenditures of the funds and the progress made by each recipient. You
will require the supervising faculty member or other appropriate university official to
review and approve the reports prepared by the fellow. Any apparent misuse of grant
funds will be promptly investigated. If you discover that funds have been misused, you
will require the recipient to return the funds immediately, and you will make no further
distributions to that recipient.

You plan to appoint six to eight members of the selection committee who are
distinguished researchers in mathematics, computing, and other relevant fields. The
selection committee will analyze the applications and interview candidates who are
potential awardees. No person on the selection committee will be in a position to derive
private benefit, directly or indirectly, if certain potential grantees are selected over others.

Basis for our determination

The law imposes certain excise taxes on the taxable expenditures of private foundations
(Code section 4945). A taxable expenditure is any amount a private foundation pays as
a grant to an individual for travel, study, or other similar purposes. However, a grant that
meets all of the following requirements of Code section 4945(g) is not a taxable
expenditure.

• The foundation awards the grant on an objective and nondiscriminatory basis.
• The IRS approves in advance the procedure for awarding the grant.
• The grant is:

  • A scholarship or fellowship subject to section 117(a) and is to be used for
    study at an educational organization described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(ii); or

  • A prize or award subject to the provisions of section 74(b), if the recipient of
    the prize or award is selected from the general public; or

  • To achieve a specific objective; produce a report or similar product; or
    improve or enhance a literary, artistic, musical, scientific, teaching, or other
    similar skill or talent of the recipient.

Letter 4779 (10-2012)
Catalog Number 58222Y

To receive approval of its educational grant procedures, Treasury Regulations section
53.4945-4(c) (1) requires that a private foundation show:

The grant procedure includes an objective and nondiscriminatory selection
process.

The grant procedure results in the recipients performing the activities the grants
were intended to finance.

The foundation plans to obtain reports to determine whether the recipients have
performed the activities that the grants were intended to finance.

Other conditions that apply to this determination

This determination covers only the grant program described above. This approval
will apply to succeeding grant programs only if their standards and procedures
don't differ significantly from those described in your original request.

This determination applies only to you. It may not be cited as precedent.

You cannot rely on the conclusions in this letter if the facts you provided have
changed substantially. You must report any significant changes in your program
to the Cincinnati Office of Exempt Organizations at:

Internal Revenue Service

Exempt Organizations Determinations
P.O. Box 2508

Cincinnati, OH 45201

You cannot make grants to your creators, officers, directors, trustees, foundation
managers, or members of selection committees or their relatives.

All funds distributed to individuals must be made on a charitable basis and must
further the purposes of your organization. You cannot award grants for a purpose
that is inconsistent with Code section 170(c) (2) (B).

You should keep adequate records and case histories so that you can substantiate
your grant distributions with the IRS if necessary.

We've sent a copy of this letter to your representatives as indicated in your power of
attorney.

Letter 4779 (10-2012)
Catalog Number 58222Y

Please keep a copy of this letter in your records.

If you have any questions, please contact the person listed at the top of this letter.

Sincerely,

Jeffrey I. Cooper
Director, Exempt Organizations
Rulings and Agreements

Letter 4779 (10-2012)
Catalog Number 58222Y

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2016, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.