🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 201641012 Released October 7, 2016 Approved

Parent receives more time to request consolidated-return waiver

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2016
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A corporate parent sold a subsidiary and later reacquired it within 61 months, when section 1504(a)(3) ordinarily barred the subsidiary and another company from rejoining the parent's consolidated group. The group filed its return as though both companies had rejoined but failed to attach the automatic-waiver request required by Revenue Procedure 2002-32. The parent showed that it reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional and sought relief before the IRS discovered the omission. The IRS granted 60 days to file the waiver election. The relief was conditioned on the group's aggregate tax liability not being lower than it would have been if the election had been timely filed.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the parent receive additional time to request a waiver of the 61-month rule for corporations rejoining a consolidated group?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 60 days to file the waiver election, subject to an aggregate-tax-liability condition.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1504(a)(3); Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 2002-32.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201641012 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 10/7/2016 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 1504.00-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------------------ ----------------------------, ID No. --------------
----------------------------------------------- -----------------
--------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
----------------------
------- ---------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:CORP:B04
PLR-112604-16
Date:
July 11, 2016

Legend

Parent = -------------------------------------

Subsidiary 1 = --------------------------------------------------------

Subsidiary 2 = ------------------------------------------

Corp X = -----------------------------------------------

Date 1 = -----------------

Date 2 = ---------------------------

Date 3 = ---------------------------

Company Official = ----------------


Tax Professional = --------------------------


Dear --------------:

PLR-112604-16 2

This letter responds to a letter dated April 11, 2016, submitted on behalf of Parent,
requesting an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and
Administration Regulations to file an election. Parent is requesting an extension of time
to file a request for an automatic waiver, pursuant to Rev. Proc. 2002-32, 2002-1 C.B.
959, of the application of § 1504(a)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code. The request for
waiver of the application of § 1504(a)(3)(A), effective for the taxable year ending Date 3,
is hereinafter sometimes referred to as the “Waiver Election.” The information provided
in that letter and in later correspondence is summarized below.

Parent was the common parent of an affiliated group of corporations, consisting of
Parent, its wholly owned subsidiary, Subsidiary 1, and its wholly owned subsidiary,
Subsidiary 2, that filed a consolidated U.S. Federal income tax return (“Parent Group”).
Parent was wholly owned by Corp X, a foreign corporation. On Date 1, Parent sold the
stock of Subsidiary 1 to Corp X, causing Subsidiary 1 and Subsidiary 2 to be
disaffiliated from Parent. On Date 2, a date within the tax year ending Date 3, Corp X
contributed the stock of Subsidiary 1 back to Parent, reaffiliating Subsidiary 1 and
Subsidiary 2 with Parent.

For the tax year ending Date 3, Parent Group filed a consolidated return consistent with
the inclusion of Subsidiary 1 and Subsidiary 2 in the Parent Group from the day after
Date 2 through Date 3. However, the tax year ending Date 3 was less than sixty-one
months following the time Subsidiary 1 and Subsidiary 2 ceased to be members of
Parent Group. Thus, pursuant to § 1504(a)(3)(A), it was necessary for Subsidiary 1 and
Subsidiary 2 to obtain a waiver under § 1504(a)(3)(B) in order for them properly to be
included in the Parent Group consolidated return for the tax year ending Date 3. The
Waiver Election should have been filed under Rev. Proc. 2002-32 with the Parent
Group’s consolidated Federal income tax return for the tax year ending Date 3.
However, for various reasons, the Waiver Election was not filed. Subsequently, it was
discovered that the Waiver Election had not been filed. Thereafter, this request was
submitted for an extension of time to file the Waiver Election. Parent has represented
that it is not seeking to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty has
been or could be imposed under § 6662 at the time of the request for relief (taking into
account any qualified amended return filed within the meaning of §1.6664-2(c)(3)).

Section 1504(a)(3)(A) provides that if a corporation is included (or required to be
included) in a consolidated Federal income tax return filed by an affiliated group of
corporations and such corporation ceases to be a member of such group, such
corporation (and any successor of such corporation) may not be included in any
consolidated return filed by the affiliated group (or by any affiliated group with the same
common parent or any successor of such common parent) before the 61st month
beginning after its first taxable year in which it ceased to be a member of such affiliated
group. However, § 1504(a)(3)(B) allows the Secretary to waive the application of
§ 1504(a)(3)(A) to any corporation for any period subject to such conditions as the
Secretary may prescribe.

PLR-112604-16 3

Rev. Proc. 2002-32 grants an automatic waiver of the general rule of § 1504(a)(3)(A) for
taxpayers who meet its requirements. Section 5 of Rev. Proc. 2002- 32 provides that in
order to obtain an automatic waiver, the deconsolidated corporation must be included in
a timely filed (including extensions) consolidated return of the affiliated group with
respect to which the waiver request relates, for the taxable year that includes the date
on which such corporation most recently became a member of such affiliated group,
and that a statement providing specified information and representations must be
attached to such return.

Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable
extension of time to make a regulatory election or a statutory election (but no more than
six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the
Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will
use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election.
Section 301.9100-1(a). Section 301.9100-1(b) defines the term “regulatory election” as
including an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation, revenue ruling,
revenue procedure, notice, or announcement. Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic
extensions of time for making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions
of time for making regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-

  1. Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides
    evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted
    reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of
    the Government. Section 301.9100-3(a).

The time for filing the Waiver Election is fixed by Rev. Proc. 2002-32. Therefore, the
Commissioner has discretionary authority under § 301.9100-1 to grant an extension of
time for Parent to file the Waiver Election, provided Parent shows it acted reasonably
and in good faith, the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 are satisfied, and
granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

Information, affidavits, and representations submitted by Parent, Company Official, and
Tax Professional explain the circumstances that resulted in the failure to timely file the
Waiver Election. The information establishes that Parent reasonably relied on a
qualified tax professional who failed to make, or advise Parent to make, the Waiver
Election and that that the request for relief was filed prior to the Service discovering that
the Waiver Election had not been timely made. See § 301.9100-3(b)(1)(i) and (v).

Based solely on the information and affidavits submitted and on the representations
made, we conclude that Parent has shown that it acted reasonably and in good faith,
the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 are satisfied, and granting relief will
not prejudice the interests of the Government. Accordingly, an extension of time is

PLR-112604-16 4

granted under § 301.9100-3, until sixty (60) days from the date on this letter, for Parent
to file the Waiver Election.

The above extension of time is conditioned on the tax liability (if any) of Parent Group
and its members not being lower, in the aggregate, for the year to which the Waiver
Election applies and all subsequent years, than it would have been if the Waiver
Election had been timely made (taking into account the time value of money). No
opinion is expressed as to the amount of tax liability for the years involved. A
determination thereof will be made by the Director's office upon audit of the Federal
income tax returns involved. Further, no opinion is expressed as to the Federal income
tax effect, if any, if it is determined that the amount of tax liability is lower. Section
301.9100-3(c).

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any matter or item discussed or referenced in this
ruling letter. In particular, we express no opinion with respect to whether Parent Group
constitutes an affiliated group that is entitled to file on a consolidated basis.

For purposes of granting this relief under § 301.9100-3, we relied upon certain
information, representations, and affidavits submitted by Parent, Company Official, and
Tax Professional under penalties of perjury. This office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the request for rulings. The Director should verify all
essential facts. In addition, notwithstanding that an extension is granted under
§ 301.9100-3 to file the Waiver Election, any penalties and interest that would otherwise
be applicable continue to apply.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to the power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this letter is being sent
to your authorized representative.

                                    Sincerely,

                                    ______________________________
                                    Ken Cohen
                                    Chief, Branch 3
                                    Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2016, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.