🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 201640010 Released September 30, 2016 Revocation

Tribe may no longer pass renewable-energy credits to lessee

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2016
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An earlier private letter ruling allowed a tribe to elect under section 50(d)(5) to pass investment credits associated with renewable-energy assets to an unrelated lessee. After reconsideration, the IRS concluded that the tribe could not make that election. The IRS prospectively revoked Private Letter Ruling 201310001. The tribe could place no further reliance on the earlier ruling.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could a tribe pass renewable-energy investment credits to an unrelated lessee under section 50(d)(5)?
  • Outcome: Revocation, effective prospectively.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 38, 50(d)(5).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service                                       Department of the Treasury
                                                               Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201640010                                              Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 9/30/2016                                        Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 38.00-00, 50.00-00
                                                               Person To Contact:
-----------------                                              ---------------, ID No. ----------------
-------------------------------------                          Telephone Number:
---------------------------------------------------            --------------------
-------------------------------                                Refer Reply To:
--------------------------                                     CC:PSI:5
                                                               PLR-117279-16
In Re: ---------------------------------------------------     Date:
                                                               June 29, 2016




LEGEND:

Tribe =            ---------------------------------------------------
                  ----------------------

Dear ------------:

      As discussed in a telephone conversation with Taxpayer’s authorized
representative, we are revoking Private Letter Ruling 201310001, dated
December 5, 2012.

       In Private Letter Ruling 201310001, the Internal Revenue Service concluded that
Tribe may elect to pass investment credits associated with the Renewable Energy
Assets to an unrelated third party lessee (Lessee) under § 50(d)(5).

       After reconsideration, we have concluded that Tribe may not elect to pass
investment credits associated with the Renewable Energy Assets to Lessee under
§ 50(d)(5). Accordingly, Private Letter Ruling 201310001 is revoked prospectively, and
Tribe may place no further reliance on the ruling.
PLR-117279-16                               2


       In accordance with the power of attorney, we are sending a copy of this letter to
Tribe’s authorized representative. We are also sending a copy of this letter to the
appropriate SB/SE office.

                                         Sincerely yours,



                                         Theresa M. Melchiorre
                                         Assistant to the Branch Chief, Branch 5
                                         Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                         (Passthroughs and Special Industries)

Enclosure:
      Copy for 6110 purposes


cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2016, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.