🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 201638004 Released September 16, 2016 Approved

S corporation election continues through restructuring steps

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2016
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An S corporation with two business groups proposed inserting a new parent, becoming disregarded or a QSub, moving one business to the parent, and then separating the other business through a new subsidiary and intended IRC § 355 distribution. The IRS ruled that the later transfer and distribution steps would be disregarded when evaluating whether the first two steps caused gain or loss or qualified as an F reorganization. It also treated the later steps as a direct transfer of the distributed business to the new subsidiary followed by the pro rata distribution of that subsidiary. The original corporation's S election would continue for the new parent, although the IRS did not decide whether the first two steps actually produced gain or an F reorganization or otherwise rule on the later steps.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: How would the restructuring steps be treated, and would the original S election continue for the new parent?
  • Outcome: Approved as to the stated step treatment and continuation of the S election.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1001, 355, 368(a)(1)(F), 381(c); Rev. Rul. 72-206.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service                                       Department of the Treasury
                                                               Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201638004                                              Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 9/16/2016                                        Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Numbers: 1001.00-00, 368.06-00
                                                               Person To Contact:
---------------------------                                    -----------------, ID No. ----------------
------------                                                   Telephone Number:
------------------------------------------                     --------------------
-------------------                                            Refer Reply To:
----------------------------------                             CC:CORP:B06
                                                               PLR-102991-16
                                                               Date:
                                                               June 16, 2016




Legend

X         =        ------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------

Y         =        -------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------

Z        =         ---------------------------------------------
                  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  ------------------------
----------------------------------------------

State X =         -------------

Dear -------------:

This letter responds to your letter dated January 8, 2016, requesting a ruling on the
Federal income tax consequences of the first two steps of the proposed transaction
described below. The information submitted in that letter and subsequent
correspondence is summarized below.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.
PLR-102991-16                                2

SUMMARY OF FACTS

X is a State X limited liability company that has elected to be treated as an S
corporation. X is engaged in two groups of business. For the sake of convenience,
these business groups are referred to as the “Retained Business” and the “Distributed
Business.” For what X represents to be valid business purposes, it proposes the
following plan (the “Restructuring”):

      (1) The X members will contribute all of their X equity units to Y, a newly-formed
          State X limited liability company, in exchange for all of the Y equity units.

      (2) X will elect to become, or by default will become, a disregarded entity or
          qualified subchapter S subsidiary for Federal tax purposes. After this step, Y
          expects to continue X’s S corporation election.

      (3) X will distribute the assets comprising the Retained Business to Y in a
          transaction that it expects to be disregarded for Federal income tax purposes.
          After this step, X would continue to hold the assets comprising the Distributed
          Business.

      (4) Y will transfer all of the equity units of X to Z, a newly-formed State X limited
          liability company, solely in exchange for all of the Z equity units. After this
          step, Z will hold only the equity units in X, which continues to hold the assets
          comprising the Distributed Business.

      (5) Y will distribute pro rata all of the equity units of Z to Y’s members in a
          transaction intended to qualify under section 355 of the Internal Revenue
          Code (the “Distribution”).

Z will elect to be treated as an S corporation effective on the day of the Distribution.
Following the Restructuring, the former X members will own all of the equity units of two
new S corporations – Y, which holds the Retained Business, and Z, which holds the
Distributed Business.

REPRESENTATIONS

      (a) As a result of Steps 1 and 2, all of the equity units of Y were received by the X
          members in exchange for all of their X equity units, except for a de minimis
          amount of Y equity units, if any, issued by Y to facilitate its organization.

      (b) As a result of Steps 1 and 2, the same person or persons that own all of the X
          equity units immediately before Steps 1 and 2, will own all of the Y equity
          units immediately after Steps 1 and 2, in identical proportions.
PLR-102991-16                                3

      (c) Y will not hold any property or have any tax attributes immediately before
          Step 1, other than a de minimis amount of assets, if any, to facilitate its
          organization, and related tax attributes.

      (d) X will completely liquidate for U.S. Federal income tax purposes by reason of
          becoming a disregarded entity for U.S. Federal income tax purposes.

      (e) As a result of Steps 1 and 2, and immediately after Steps 1 and 2, no
          corporation other than Y will hold property that was held by X immediately
          before Steps 1 and 2.

      (f) Y will adopt an LLC operating agreement that is the same in all material
          respects as X’s LLC operating agreement.

      (g) At the time of the Restructuring, none of X, Y or Z will have outstanding any
          warrants, options, convertible securities, or any other type of right pursuant to
          which any person could acquire equity units in such entity.

      (h) In the Restructuring, Y will not succeed to the items described in section
          381(c) of any corporation other than X.

      (i) Immediately following the Restructuring, the liabilities of X and any of its
          subsidiaries will be associated with the Distributed Business.

RULINGS

   (1) For purposes of determining whether Steps 1 and 2, viewed together, result in
       the realization of gain or loss under section 1001 (see Weiss v. Stearn, 265 U.S.
       242 (1924)), or a reorganization under section 368(a)(1)(F) (see Rev. Rul. 72-
       206, 1972-1 C.B. 104), Steps 3 through 5 shall be disregarded.

   (2) For U.S. Federal income tax purposes, Steps 3 through 5 will be treated as a
       direct transfer of the Distributed Business by Y to Z in exchange for all of the
       equity units of Z and the assumption of associated liabilities, followed by the pro
       rata distribution by Y of all of the equity units of Z to Y’s members.

   (3) X’s S election will not terminate as a result of the completion of Steps 1 and 2,
       but continues for Y.

CAVEATS

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter. In particular, other than the above, no opinion is expressed about the U.S.
PLR-102991-16                                  4

Federal income tax consequences of Steps 3 through 5. Furthermore, no opinion is
expressed regarding whether Steps 1 and 2, viewed together, result in the realization of
gain or loss under section 1001, or a reorganization under section 368(a)(1)(F).

PROCEDURAL INFORMATION

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.

                                       Sincerely,


                                       _Douglas C. Bates______
                                       Douglas C. Bates
                                       Chief, Branch 4
                                       Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                       (Corporate)

cc:


Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2016, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.