Scholarship fund tied to a beauty pageant is denied tax-exempt status
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An organization sought recognition as a tax-exempt charity to raise and distribute scholarships, most of which would go to participants in a related beauty pageant. Contestants had to sign contracts requiring fundraising, appearances, media use rights, and service obligations, and the scholarships were awarded without regard to academic performance. The IRS concluded that the awards compensated contestants for contractual participation rather than serving as disinterested educational grants. It denied exemption under IRC § 501(c)(3) because the organization operated for the private benefit of the related pageant organization and its contestants. The denial became final when the organization did not protest within 30 days.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Did the organization operate exclusively for charitable or educational purposes under IRC § 501(c)(3)?
- Outcome: Denied
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 117 and 501(c)(3); Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(3)-1; Bingler v. Johnson, 394 U.S. 741 (1969); Miss Georgia Scholarship Fund, Inc. v. Commissioner, 72 TC 267 (1979)
Full text (IRS public release)
Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service
P.O. Box 2508
Cincinnati, OH 45201
Number: 201634025
Release Date: 8/19/2016
Date:
May 26, 2016
Employer ID number:
UIL: 501.03-00
501.03-22
Contact person/ID number:
Contact telephone number:
Form you must file:
Tax years:
Dear
This letter is our final determination that you don’t qualify for tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code (the Code). Recently, we sent you a proposed adverse determination in response to your
application. The proposed adverse determination explained the facts, law, and basis for our conclusion, and it
gave you 30 days to file a protest. Because we didn’t receive a protest within the required 30 days, the proposed
determination is now final.
Because you don’t qualify as a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code, donors can’t
deduct contributions to you under Section 170 of the Code. You must file federal income tax returns for the tax
years listed at the top of this letter using the required form (also listed at the top of this letter) within 30 days of
this letter unless you request an extension of time to file.
We’ll make this final adverse determination letter and the proposed adverse determination letter available for
public inspection (as required under Section 6110 of the Code) after deleting certain identifying information.
Please read the enclosed Notice 437, Notice of Intention to Disclose, and review the two attached letters that
show our proposed deletions. If you disagree with our proposed deletions, follow the instructions in the Notice
437 on how to notify us. If you agree with our deletions, you don’t need to take any further action.
We’ll also notify the appropriate state officials of our determination by sending them a copy of this final letter
and the proposed determination letter (under Section 6104(c) of the Code). You should contact your state
officials if you have questions about how this determination will affect your state responsibilities and
requirements.
Letter 4038 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47632S
If you have questions about this letter, you can contact the person listed at the top of this letter. If you have
questions about your federal income tax status and responsibilities, call our customer service number at
1-800-829-1040 (TTY 1-800-829-4933 for deaf or hard of hearing) or customer service for businesses at
1-800-829-4933.
We sent a copy of this letter to your representative as indicated in your power of attorney.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey I. Cooper
Director, Exempt Organizations
Rulings and Agreements
Enclosures:
Notice 437
Redacted Letter 4036, Proposed Adverse Determination Under IRC Section 501(c)(3)
Redacted Letter 4038, Final Adverse Determination Under IRC Section 501(c)(3) - No Protest
Letter 4038 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47632S
Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service
P.O. Box 2508
Cincinnati, OH 45201
Date: March 29, 2016
Employer ID number:
Contact person/ID number:
Contact telephone number:
Contact fax number:
Legend: UIL:
B = State 501.03-00
C = Organization Name 501.03.22
D = Date
E = Foundation Name
F = Scholarship Program
G = Organization Name
v = Number
w dollars = Amount
x dollars = Amount
y dollars = Amount
z dollars = Amount
Dear
We considered your application for recognition of exemption from federal income tax under Section 501(a) of
the Internal Revenue Code (the Code). Based on the information provided, we determined that you don’t qualify
for exemption under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code. This letter explains the basis for our conclusion. Please
keep it for your records.
Issues
Do you qualify for exemption under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code? No, for the reasons stated below.
Facts
You were incorporated on D in the state of B. Your Articles of Incorporation indicate your purpose is to
establish, maintain and award scholarships to B students in order to pursue post-secondary study including, but
not limited to, trade and technical, undergraduate, graduate and professional education. Your Form 1023
indicates you were formed to fund scholarships for the young women who compete and earn scholarship
assistance in F, the official state entity for C, which is exempt under Section 501(c)(4). C’s primary activity is
operating a beauty pageant. F operates the pageant for Miss B.
Letter 4036 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47630W
You are affiliated with G and E which are both affiliated with C and F; in addition, E is the state organization
that offers a scholarship package to the winner of the Miss B pageant and is also exempt under Section
501(c)(4). You were established because a separate scholarship fund was seen as a simpler and a more
productive way to raise scholarship money for contestants in the pageant since your sole purpose is to solicit
and fund academic scholarships for participants in these pageants. You wrote that tax exempt status will open
the door widely for the solicitation of funds
Prior to competing in the pageant for Miss B, each contestant must sign a contract common to all pageants
affiliated with C.
The contract states:
-
Contestants must agree to raise a minimum amount of funds for a specific charity and for C’s
scholarship fund as well as participate in the series of events and appearances leading up to the final
selection of Miss B. -
Contestants will be bound by the rules and regulations governing C and the procedures for the awarding
and supervision of all scholarships. -
If she is selected as the winner of the competition, she will serve as Miss B during the Year of Service
and until her successor is selected or appointed. -
As winner she will dedicate her entire time, efforts and energy during the Year of Service to the
fulfillment of these duties and obligations, and that she will engage in no other business or other
activities that will in any way interfere with the duties and obligations of her Year of Service. -
The winner’s participation in the competition shall include all public appearances required by G
including, but not limited to, television and radio broadcasts, personal appearances, interviews, still
photo sessions, and video and audio taping or filming of all or any part of the events associated with the
competition. -
For the runner up she agrees to remain available to assume all of the rights, obligations and
commitments of the Year of Service. -
The competition is critically important and the single most widely recognized element of the program.
By signing the contract, contestants understand and acknowledge:
-
Scholarships granted are subject to the terms and conditions of the Scholarship Rules and Regulations
provided by F. -
They agree to be bound by those rules and regulations.
-
All scholarships that may be awarded will be non-forfeitable in the event that there is a breach of the
contract or fail to perform any duties as Contestants. -
Scholarships may be forfeited if there are any misrepresentations as to their eligibility to compete.
The contract also indicates that the winner authorizes G and anyone duly licensed or authorized by G to:
(1) Televise, photograph, broadcast and/or make radio, television, video and audio tapes or motion picture
recordings of her individually or in a group;
(2) Use or re-use such photographs, recordings, video tapes, audio tapes and/or motion picture films in all
media throughout the world in perpetuity; and
Letter 4036 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47630W
(3) Use her name, likeness and/or physical depiction for any purpose in perpetuity, in an unedited or edited
manner or fashion as G, in its sole discretion, shall determine. This authorization shall also include the
use of all such photographs, recordings, videotapes, audiotapes and/or motion picture films made during
her Year of Service.
The contract calls the winner an independent contractor with respect to C and that she is not and will not
become an employee of C during her Year of Service.
Your Schedule H states the following:
-
There is no application process for scholarships payable to contestants in F who will alert you of eligible
recipients, including the level of scholarship earned. Upon proof of tuition due, your treasurer will make
payment as directed. -
Scholarships payable to participants are payable without consideration of academic performance. If they
are earned and a participant is enrolled in school and has educational related expenses due, it will be
paid up to the amount of the scholarship earned. Scholarships payable to other individuals will be based
on the letter of application demonstrating an educational plan, need and achievements to date and
verification by you. -
You are unlikely to have very large sums of money to award, perhaps no more than w dollars per year
anytime within the near future. Up to as much as x dollars of this sum (over 80%) will be set aside for
participants in the beauty pageant. The goal is to award as many other scholarships as possible. The
current maximum for other scholarships is z dollars per person. If exemption is granted, the chances are
very good that more funds will be received and the number of all scholarships can be increased.
For the current year, E intends to award about v scholarships consisting of a scholarship package of y dollars,
which is allocated among the winner of the pageant and the first through fourth runners-up. Also as a part of
that package there are other smaller scholarships available to contestants such as most talented non-finalist and
a community service scholarship. Your goal is to enrich the lives and potential grant of scholarships to as many
participants as possible.
You also wrote that when sufficient money has been accumulated, you may fund scholarships of at least z
dollars each for both men and women. These will be awarded based on demonstrated need and academic
achievement. Moreover you will give special consideration to older students returning to school and those
entering into trade and technical programs.
Finally, you stated that there is a relationship between you and E, but each is a separate entity with an
independent board of directors and officers so as to avoid any conflict of interest.
Law
Section 501(c)(3) of the Code provides for exemption from federal income tax of organizations organized and
operated exclusively for educational or charitable purposes, no part of the net earnings of which inures to the
benefit of any private shareholder or individual.
Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations states that in order to qualify under section 501(c)(3)
of the Code, an organization must be both organized and operated exclusively for one or more of the purposes
specified in such section. If an organization fails to meet either the organizational or operational test, it is not
exempt.
Letter 4036 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47630W
Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations states that an organization will be regarded as
"operated exclusively" for one or more exempt purposes only if it engages primarily in activities which
accomplish one or more such exempt purposes specified in section 501(c)(3) of the Code. An organization will
not be so regarded if more than an insubstantial part of its activities is not in furtherance of an exempt purpose.
Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Regulations states that an organization is not operated
exclusively for one or more exempt purposes unless it serves a public rather than a private interest. It must not
be operated for the benefit of designated individuals or the persons who created it.
In Bingler v. Johnson, 394 U.S. 741 (1969), the court considered whether educational stipends paid by
Westinghouse Electric Corp., to its employees were "scholarships" excludable from gross income. The
court held the stipends were compensation, not scholarships excludable from income, because they required
employees to submit progress reports while on educational leave of absence and return to Westinghouse's
employ for a substantial period of time after completing the leave. The Court explained that under I.R.C. 117
scholarship grants must be "relatively disinterested, 'no strings' educational grants, with no requirements of any
substantial quid pro quo from the recipients."
In Miss Georgia Scholarship Fund, Inc. v. Commissioner, 72 TC 267 (1979), the Tax Court held that a separate
fund created by the Miss Georgia Pageant solely to award scholarships to the pageant's contestants, did not
qualify under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code because the scholarships were awarded in consideration of
contractual obligations. The contract required contestants to participate in the Miss Georgia Pageant and appear
in public as directed by pageant officials. A winning contestant who failed to honor the contract forfeited all
rights to her “scholarship.” The Tax Court concluded that the “scholarships” were compensation for signing the
pageant contract and for performing services under it. Therefore, these awards were not Section 117
scholarships and the fund was not operated exclusively for Section 501(c)(3) purposes.
Application of Law
You are not as described in section 501(c)(3) of the Code because you are not exclusively organized and operated
for charitable or educational purposes.
You have not established you meet the operational test as per Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1) of the Regulations
because you are operating for substantial non-exempt private purposes in contravention to Section 1.501(c)(3)-
1(c)(1) of the regulations. The information you provided shows you are operating for substantial private
purposes as indicated by the following:
-
You are operating for the private purpose of benefiting E, which is exempt under Section 501(c)(4) and
has been providing scholarships to contestants in the beauty pageant. For example, you were established
because you believe a separate scholarship fund was seen as a simpler and a more productive way to
raise scholarship money for contestants in the pageant. -
You are operating for the private purpose of benefiting the contestants in the pageant because many
contestants receive a scholarship for signing the contract to participate in the pageant. For instance, you
stated it is your goal to maximize the number of scholarships awarded to as many participants as
possible.
You are not described in Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii) of the Regulations. You are serving the private
interests of the contestants by providing many of them at least a nominal scholarship as compensation for
signing the contract to participate in the pageant. Furthermore, you are taking over the same scholarship
Letter 4036 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47630W
program currently conducted by E using the same criteria, rules and contract. Your activities do not differ
significantly from E’s. Therefore, you are operating for private interests of E.
Your scholarship program has characteristics like that described in Bingler v. Johnson, 394 U.S. 741 (1969)
because it serves as compensation to the contestants since they are required to sign an extensive contract. Even
though you state your scholarships are non-forfeitable, the fact is all participants must sign the contract to
compete in the pageant which indicates a quid for quo relationship. Like the organization in the court case,
there are strings attached which disqualifies your program from exemption.
Your scholarship program is also similar to that found in Miss Georgia Scholarship Fund, Inc. v. Commissioner
because your “scholarships" to contestants in the pageant serve as compensation. For example, you were
created to solely award scholarships to contestants in F’s beauty pageant. As an eligibility requirement to
compete in the pageant, all contestants must agree to the terms of the contract before participating in the beauty
pageant. There is no application for the scholarship program and scholarships are payable without
consideration of academic performance. The winner is also referred to as an independent contractor and must
fulfill numerous obligations directed by the contract. Therefore, these awards are not section 117 scholarships
and you are not operating exclusively for section 501(c)(3) purposes.
Conclusion
Based on the above facts and analysis you do not qualify for exemption under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code
because you are not operated exclusively for an exempt purposes as required by Sections 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1)
and 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations. You are operating for the benefit of E as well as for the
participants in your beauty pageant. Although the scholarships are non-forfeitable, they are considered
compensation because participants must agree to the terms in the contract before competing in the pageant.
Accordingly we conclude you do not qualify for exemption under Section 501(c)(3).
If you don’t agree
You have a right to file a protest if you don’t agree with our proposed adverse determination. To do so, you
must send a statement to us within 30 days of the date of this letter. The statement must include:
-
Your name, address, employer identification number (EIN), and a daytime phone
number -
A copy of this letter highlighting the findings you disagree with
-
An explanation of why you disagree, including any supporting documents
-
The law or authority, if any, you are relying on
-
The signature of an officer, director, trustee, or other official who is authorized to sign for the
organization, or your authorized representative -
One of the following declarations:
For an officer, director, trustee, or other official who is authorized to sign for the organization:
Letter 4036 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47630W
Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I examined this protest statement, including
accompanying documents, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, the statement contains all
relevant facts and such facts are true, correct, and complete.
For authorized representatives:
Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I prepared this protest statement, including
accompanying documents, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, the statement contains all
relevant facts and such facts are true, correct, and complete.
Your representative (attorney, certified public accountant, or other individual enrolled to practice before the
IRS) must file a Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative, with us if he or she hasn’t
already done so. You can find more information about representation in Publication 947, Practice Before the
IRS and Power of Attorney.
We’ll review your protest statement and decide if you provided a basis for us to reconsider our determination. If
so, we’ll continue to process your case considering the information you provided. If you haven’t provided a
basis for reconsideration, we’ll forward your case to the Office of Appeals and notify you. You can find more
information about the role of the Appeals Office in Publication 892, How to Appeal an IRS Decision on Tax-
Exempt Status.
If you don’t file a protest within 30 days, you can’t seek a declaratory judgment in court at a later date because
the law requires that you use the IRS administrative process first (Section 7428(b)(2) of the Code).
Where to send your protest
Please send your protest statement, Form 2848, if needed, and any supporting documents to the applicable
address:
U.S. mail: Street address for delivery service:
Internal Revenue Service Internal Revenue Service
EO Determinations Quality Assurance EO Determinations Quality Assurance
Room 7-008 550 Main Street, Room 7-008
P.O. Box 2508 Cincinnati, OH 45202
Cincinnati, OH 45201
You can also fax your statement and supporting documents to the fax number listed at the top of this letter. If
you fax your statement, please contact the person listed at the top of this letter to confirm that he or she received
it.
If you agree
If you agree with our proposed adverse determination, you don’t need to do anything. If we don’t hear from you
within 30 days, we’ll issue a final adverse determination letter. That letter will provide information on your
income tax filing requirements.
Letter 4036 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47630W
You can find all forms and publications mentioned in this letter on our website at www.irs.gov/formspubs. If
you have questions, you can contact the person listed at the top of this letter.
We sent a copy of this letter to your representative as indicated in your power of attorney.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey I. Cooper
Director, Exempt Organizations
Rulings and Agreements
Enclosure:
Publication 892
cc: POA Name
Letter 4036 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47630W
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2016, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.