🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 201624016 Released June 10, 2016 Approved

A partnership received 120 days to make a section 754 election

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2016
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Interests in a limited liability company taxed as a partnership passed to several recipients after two partners died. The partnership filed its return without a section 754 election because it did not know the election was available and its tax adviser did not recommend it. After learning of the omission, the partnership sought relief and represented that it had acted reasonably and in good faith, that relief would not prejudice the government, and that it was not using hindsight. The IRS found the section 301.9100-3 standards satisfied. It granted 120 days to file a written section 754 election for the original tax year so basis adjustments under sections 734(b) and 743(b) could apply.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the partnership receive extra time to make a section 754 basis-adjustment election after inherited partnership interests were transferred?
  • Outcome: Approved, a 120-day extension was granted
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 734(b), 743(b), and 754; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.754-1(b) and 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service                                       Department of the Treasury
                                                               Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201624016                                              Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/10/2016                                        Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Numbers: 754.00-00, 9100.15-00
                                                               Person To Contact:
----------------------------------------------------           ------------------, ID No. ------------------
--------------------------------------------------------       Telephone Number:
---------------------------                                    ----------------------
----------------------------------------                       Refer Reply To:
                                                               CC:PSI:B01
                                                               PLR-139070-15
                                                               Date:
                                                               March 04, 2016




LEGEND

X                 =         --------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------

A                 =         -----------------------
----------------------------------------------------

B                 =         --------------------
----------------------------------------------------

C                 =         ----------------------------
------------------------------------------------------

D                 =         ------------------------
------------------------------------------------------

E                 =         ---------------------
------------------------------------------------------

F                 =         -----------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------

G                 =         -----------------------
------------------------------------------------------

H                 =         -----------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
PLR-139070-15                                          2

Date 1         =         --------------------

Date 2         =         ------------------------

Date 3         =         -------------------

Date 4         =         ---------------------------

Year 1         =         ---------

Year 2         =         -------

n%             =         -----------

o%             =         -----------

p%             =         ------

q%             =         ------

State          =         -----------



Dear ----------------:

This is in response to a letter dated November 30, 2015, and supplemental
correspondence, submitted on behalf of X, by X’s authorized representative, requesting
an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration
Regulations to file an election under § 754 of the Internal Revenue Code.

FACTS

According to the information submitted, X was formed as a limited liability company
under the laws of State on Date 1 and is treated as a partnership for federal tax
purposes.

On Date 2, A, a partner of X, died. On Date 3, B, a partner of X, died. After A’s death,
A’s n% interest in X was to be transferred to B. However, B died before the transfer
occurred. After B’s death, A’s n% interest and B’s o% interest in X were transferred to
C, D, E, F, G and H. C, D, E, and F each received p% of A’s n% interest and p% of B’s
o% interest in X. G and H each received q% of A’s n% interest and q% of B’s o%
interest in X.
PLR-139070-15                                 3

X filed its income tax return for Year 1. X represents that it relied upon its tax advisor
when preparing the tax return for Year 1. X represents that it was not aware of its
eligibility to make a section 754 election and that it was not advised by its tax advisor to
make a section 754 election. X further represents that around Year 2, X became aware
of its eligibility to make a section 754 election and its failure to timely make the election
with its return for its taxable year ending on Date 4.

X further represents that it has acted reasonably and in good faith, that granting relief
will not prejudice the interests of the government, and that it is not using hindsight in
making the election.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 754 provides that a partnership may elect to adjust the basis of partnership
property when there is a distribution of property or a transfer of a partnership interest.
An election under § 754 applies with respect to all distributions of property by the
partnership and to all transfers of interests in the partnership during the taxable year
with respect to which the election was filed and all subsequent taxable years.

Section 1.754-1(b) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that an election under § 754
to adjust the basis of partnership property under §§ 734(b) and 743(b), with respect to a
distribution of property to a partner or a transfer of an interest in a partnership, must be
made in a written statement filed with the partnership return for the taxable year during
which the distribution or transfer occurs. For the election to be valid, the return must be
filed not later than the time prescribed by § 1.6031-1(e) (including extensions) for filing
the return for such taxable year.

Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner may grant a reasonable extension of time to
make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except
in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue
Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 301-9100-1(b) defines the term
"regulatory election" as including an election whose due date is prescribed by a
regulation published in the Federal Register.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards that the Commissioner
will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election. Section
301.9100-1(a). Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making
certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides rules for requesting extensions of time
for regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides
evidence to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that
granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Section 301-9100-3(a).
PLR-139070-15                                  4

CONCLUSION

Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that
the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. As a result, X
is granted an extension of time of one hundred twenty (120) days from the date of this
letter to make a § 754 election for Year 1. The election should be made in a written
statement filed with the applicable service center for association with X’s tax return for
its taxable year ending Date 4. A copy of this letter should be attached to the statement
filed.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides
that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being
sent to your authorized representative.

                                       Sincerely,



                                       Curt G. Wilson
                                       Deputy Associate Chief Counsel
                                       (Passthroughs & Special Industries)



                                  By: David R. Haglund
                                      David R. Haglund
                                      Branch Chief, Branch 1
                                      Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                      (Passthroughs & Special Industries)



Enclosures (2)
      Copy of this letter
      Copy for § 6110 purposes

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2016, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.