🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 201617017 Released April 22, 2016 Approved Transcribed from scan

Taxpayer receives waiver after Roth IRA funds lacked a qualified custodian

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2016
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer moved money directly from two Roth IRAs into an investment fund after a capital management company represented that the investment could be held through an IRA. The company and taxpayer believed the fund's bank custodian would serve as the qualified IRA custodian, but later learned that it was not doing so. The company accepted responsibility for the misleading communications and arranged for a trust company to serve as custodian, while the taxpayer represented that she had not used the funds for another purpose. The IRS waived the 60-day rollover deadline and allowed 60 days to move the original distributed amounts into an IRA with a valid custodian. Earnings on those amounts could not be rolled over and had to be included in gross income.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the taxpayer receive a waiver of the 60-day rollover deadline when misleading communications caused Roth IRA funds to be invested without a qualified IRA custodian?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 60 days to complete the rollover of the original distributed amounts
  • Key authorities: IRC § 408(d)(3); Rev. Proc. 2003-16

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

JAN 27 2016

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00

T:EP:RA:T1

Legend

Taxpayer A =

Roth IRA B =

Roth IRA C =

Financial Institution D =

Financial Institution E =

Fund F =

Company G =

Trust Company H =

Trust Company I =

Amount 1 =

Amount 2 =

Amount 3 =

2

Dear Dr.                 :

This is in response to your request dated August 28, 2015, revised and restated
on December 4, 2015, in which you request, through your authorized
representative, a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section
408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of
perjury in support of the ruling requested.

Taxpayer A represents that she received a distribution equal to Amount 1 from
Roth IRA B, which was maintained by Financial Institution D and Amount 2 from
Roth IRA C, which was maintained by Financial Institution E. Taxpayer A asserts
that her failure to accomplish a rollover within the 60-day period prescribed by
408(d)(3)(A) of the Code was due to misleading communications with Company
G.

In 2014, Taxpayer A contacted Company G, a capital management company, to
inquire about investing her own IRA in Fund F, which is located in the United
States. Company G informed Taxpayer A that she could invest her IRA in Fund
F and sent her a Subscription Agreement. On September 16, 2014, Taxpayer A
completed the Subscription Agreement to purchase shares (“Shares”) in Fund F
equal to Amount 3 (Amount 1 and Amount 2). Company G assisted Taxpayer A
in completing the Subscription Agreement in a manner it believed was
appropriate for an investment by an IRA. On the Subscription Agreement,
Taxpayer A identified the form of organization of the Subscriber of the Shares as
an IRA.

On October 30, 2014, Amount 1 and Amount 2 were wired directly from Roth IRA
B and Roth IRA C respectively, to the bank custodian of Fund F’s assets, Trust
Company H. Monthly financial statements from Company G identified the holder
of the Shares as “Taxpayer A Roth IRA.” In March of 2015, Company G
requested IRA rollover information from Fund F’s accounting firm and from Trust
Company H. Discussions ensued, which led to the discovery by Company G that
Trust Company H was not acting as the IRA custodian for Taxpayer A’s
investment in Fund F.

Taxpayer A submitted a letter to the Internal Revenue Service from Company G
explaining its mistaken assumption that Trust Company H was the custodian for
Taxpayer A’s IRA, and claiming responsibility for the error. In its letter, Company
G stated the IRA investors had no way of knowing their accounts were not
maintained by a qualified IRA custodian and has obtained a commitment from a
trust company to serve as a custodian. Company G also stated that it will revise
its subscription agreements to ensure the error does not recur. Taxpayer A
represents that she has not used Amount 3 for any other purpose. Taxpayer A
also represents that, if a waiver is granted, she will receive a cash distribution

3

from Fund F equal to Amount 3 and roll over Amount 3 into an IRA with a valid
custodian, Trust Company I.

Based on the above facts and representations, you request a ruling that the
Service waive the 60-day rollover requirement under section 408(d)(3) of the
Code as to the distribution of Amount 3 and that Taxpayer A be given a period of
60 days from the issuance of the ruling to complete the rollover of Amount 3.

Section 408(a) of the Code defines an IRA to mean a trust created or organized
in the United States, and requires that the trustee be a bank or an approved non-
bank trustee.

Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in
section 408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in
gross income by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner
provided under section 72.

Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines, and provides the rules applicable to IRA
rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) does not apply
to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit
the IRA is maintained if:

(i) the entire amount received (including money or any other property) is
paid into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after
the day on which the individual receives the payment or distribution; or

(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is
paid into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such
individual not later than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or
distribution is received, except that the maximum amount which may be paid into
such plan may not exceed the portion of the amount received which is includible
in gross income (determined without regard to section 408(d)(3)).

Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not apply
to any amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from
an IRA if at any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such receipt
such individual received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i)
from an IRA which was not includible in gross income because of the application
of section 408(d)(3).

Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for
partial rollovers.

4

Section 408(d)(3)(E) of the Code provides that the rollover provisions of section
408(d) do not apply to any amount required to be distributed under section
408(a)(6).

Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary of the Treasury may
waive the 60-day requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D)
where the failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good
conscience, including casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable
control of the individual subject to such requirement.

Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359, provides that the Service will issue a
ruling waiving the 60-day rollover requirement in cases where the failure to waive
such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including
casualty, disaster or other events beyond the reasonable control of the taxpayer.
In determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement
pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service will consider all relevant
facts and circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution;
(2) inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization,
incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error; (3) the
use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of payment by check,
whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the distribution
occurred.

The information and documentation submitted are consistent with Taxpayer A’s
assertion that the failure to accomplish a rollover within the 60-day period
prescribed by 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code was due to misleading communications
with Company G, which has since revised the language in its Subscription
Agreement.

Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service waives the
60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount 3 and
Taxpayer A has 60 days from the issuance of this letter ruling to complete the
rollover of Amount 3 from Fund F to an IRA. Such rollover can consist only of the
cash (or other property) received in the distribution of Amount 1 from Roth IRA B
and Amount 2 from Roth IRA C. Any earnings on Amount 3 cannot be rolled
over and must be included in Taxpayer A’s gross income at the time of the
rollover of Amount 3 from Fund F to a Roth IRA.

Provided all other requirements of section 408(d)(3) of the Code, except the 60-
day requirement, will be met with respect to the contribution of Amount 1,
Amount 1 will be considered a rollover contribution within the meaning of section
408(d)(3).

This ruling does not authorize the rollover of amounts that are required to be
distributed by section 408(a)(6) of the Code.

5

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described
herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations
which may be applicable thereto.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter ruling
is being sent to your authorized representative.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact                 )
at                 . Please address all correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:T1.

Sincerely yours,

Carlton A. Watkins, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1

Enclosures:
Notice of Intention to Disclose
Deleted copy of this letter

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2016, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.