🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 201611005 Released March 11, 2016 Approved

Consolidated group receives more time to elect an extended NOL carryback

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2016
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A consolidated corporate group incurred a net operating loss eligible for the extended carryback rules then available under section 172(b)(1)(H). The common parent intended to carry the loss back beyond the ordinary two-year period, but a valid election was not filed by the deadline because of its reliance on a tax professional. The IRS found that the parent acted reasonably and in good faith and that relief would not prejudice the government. It granted 60 days to file the election, provided the group qualified substantively and its aggregate tax liability would not be lower than if the election had been timely made.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the common parent make a late election to use an extended carryback period for a consolidated net operating loss?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 60 days to file and subject to stated conditions.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 172(b)(1)(H) and 1502; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1502-21 and 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 2009-52

Full text (IRS public release)

~~~
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201611005 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 3/11/2016 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 1502.21-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------------- -----------------------, ID No. --------------
----------------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------------------------- ----------------------
---------------------------- Refer Reply To:
----------------------------------------------- CC:CORP:B04
PLR-126209-15
Date:
December 15, 2015

Legend

Parent = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------

Date 1 = ---------------------------

Date 2 = ---------------------------

Date 3 = ----------------------------

a = --

Company = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Official & Tax -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Professional ----------------------------

Dear ------------------:

   This is in response to a letter dated September 11, 2015, submitted on behalf of

Parent, requesting an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and
Administration Regulations to file an election. In particular, Parent is requesting an
extension of time for the consolidated group of which Parent was the common parent,
during the year at issue, to elect an extended carryback period (the “Election”) for a
PLR-126209-15 2

consolidated net operating loss (“CNOL”). The material information submitted for
consideration is summarized below.

  Parent was the common parent of a consolidated group (the “Parent Group”).

Parent Group incurred a CNOL in the taxable year ending Date 2 (the “Year 2 CNOL”).
Parent seeks to carry back the Year 2 CNOL a years, to its taxable year ending on Date
1, under § 172(b)(1)(H)(i) of the Internal Revenue Code.

     Parent was required to file the Election in order to carry back the Year 2 CNOL to

its taxable year ending on Date 1 and to obtain the benefit of § 56(d)(1)(A)(ii)(I). The
Election was due on Date 3, but for various reasons a valid Election was not filed. After
the due date for the Election, it was discovered that the Election had not been filed.
Subsequently, this request was submitted, under § 301.9100-3, for an extension of time
to file the Election. Parent has represented that it is not seeking to alter a return
position for which an accuracy-related penalty has been or could be imposed under
§ 6662 at the time Parent requested relief (taking into account any qualified amended
return filed within the meaning of § 1.6664-2(c)(3)) and for which the new return position
requires or permits a regulatory election for which relief is requested.

   Section 172(b)(1)(A)(i) generally permits a taxpayer to carry back a net operating

loss (“NOL”) to each of the 2 taxable years preceding the taxable year of the NOL.

   Section 172(b)(1)(H)(i) permits a taxpayer to elect to carry back an applicable net

operating loss (“applicable NOL”) to each of the 3, 4, or 5 taxable years preceding the
taxable year of the applicable NOL, in lieu of the 2-year period provided by
§ 172(b)(1)(A)(i). Section 172(b)(1)(H)(ii) provides that an “applicable NOL” is the
taxpayer's NOL for a taxable year ending after December 31, 2007, and beginning
before January 1, 2010.

    Section 172(b)(1)(H)(iii) provides that the election under § 172(b)(1)(H) shall be

made by the due date (including extension of time) for filing the return for the taxpayer's
last taxable year beginning in 2009. The election is irrevocable and, in general, may be
made only with respect to one taxable year.

   Section 1502 provides that the Secretary shall prescribe such regulations as he

may deem necessary in order that the tax liability of any affiliated group of corporations
making a consolidated return and of each corporation in the group, both during and after
the period of affiliation, may be returned, determined, computed, assessed, collected,
and adjusted, in such manner as clearly to reflect the income tax liability and the various
factors necessary for the determination of such liability, and in order to prevent
avoidance of such tax liability. In carrying out the preceding sentence, the Secretary
may prescribe rules that are different from the provisions of chapter 1 that would apply if
such corporations filed separate returns.
PLR-126209-15 3

   Section 1.1502-21(b) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that losses taken

into account in determining a CNOL may be carried to other taxable years (whether
consolidated or separate) only under paragraph (b) of § 1.1502-21.

   Section 1.1502-21(b)(1) provides that NOL carryovers and carrybacks to a

taxable year are determined under the principles of § 172 and § 1.1502-21.

  Section 1.1502-21T(b)(3)(v)(A)(1), as in effect for the year at issue, provided that

a consolidated group could elect an extended carryback period pursuant to
§ 172(b)(1)(H) with regard to a CNOL arising in a taxable year ending after December
31, 2007, and beginning before January 1, 2010.

     Rev. Proc. 2009-52, 2009-49 I.R.B. 744, provides when and how a taxpayer may

make an election under § 172(b)(1)(H). Section 4.01(2) of Rev. Proc. 2009-52 provides
that the common parent of a consolidated group makes the election for the group.
Sections 4.01(3) and 4.01(4) of Rev. Proc. 2009-52 permit the election to be made for
consolidated taxpayers by attaching a statement to the original or amended
consolidated return for the taxable year of the applicable CNOL, by attaching a
statement to the taxpayer's amended consolidated return applying the applicable CNOL
to the carryback year, or by attaching a statement to a claim for a tentative carryback
adjustment on Form 1139, Corporation Application for Tentative Refund. Sections
4.01(3)(b) and 4.01(4)(b) of Rev. Proc. 2009-52 require the election, regardless of the
manner in which made, to be filed no later than the due date (including extensions) for
filing the return for the taxpayer's last taxable year beginning in 2009.

   Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable

extension of time to make a regulatory election or a statutory election (but no more than
six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the
Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

    Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the

Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a
regulatory election. Section 301.9100-1(a). Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will
be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting
relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Section 301.9100-3(a).

    The election by a consolidated group to extend the carryback period under

§ 172(b)(1)(H) for a CNOL is a regulatory election. Therefore, the Commissioner has
discretionary authority under § 301.9100-3 to grant an extension of time for Parent to
file the Election, provided Parent establishes to the satisfaction of the Commissioner
that it acted reasonably and in good faith, the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and
301.9100-3 are satisfied, and granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the
government.
PLR-126209-15 4

    Information, affidavits, and representations submitted by Parent and Company

Official & Tax Professional explain the circumstances that resulted in the failure to
timely file a valid Election. The information establishes that Parent reasonably relied on
a qualified tax professional who failed to make, or advise Parent to make, the Election,
and that the request for relief was filed before the failure to timely make the Election
was discovered by the Internal Revenue Service. See §§ 301.9100-3(b)(1)(i) and (v).

   Based on the facts and information submitted, including the affidavits submitted

and the representations made, we conclude that Parent has shown it acted reasonably
and in good faith, that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 are satisfied,
and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Accordingly,
provided that, and to the extent that, the Parent Group qualifies substantively to file the
Election, we grant an extension of time under § 301.9100-3, until sixty (60) days from
the date on this letter, for Parent to file the Election. This letter does not extend the
period of time described in § 6511 by which a taxpayer is required to file a claim for
credit or refund of an overpayment of tax.

    Parent may file the Election under § 172(b)(1)(H)(i) to carry back the Year 2

CNOL to its taxable year ending on Date 1 on Form 1120X, Amended U.S. Corporation
Income Tax Return, for the taxable year ending Date 2, according to the procedures set
forth in Rev. Proc. 2009-52. A copy of this letter must be attached to the Form 1120X. If
Parent files Form 1120X electronically, Parent may satisfy the requirement of attaching
a copy of this letter by attaching a statement to the Parent Group's amended return that
provides the date and control number (PLR-126209-15) of this letter ruling.

   The above extension of time is conditioned on the Parent Group's tax liability, if

any, not being lower in the aggregate for all years to which the Election applies than it
would have been if the Election had been timely made (taking into account the time
value of money). We express no opinion as to the Parent Group's tax liability for the
years involved. A determination thereof will be made by the applicable Director's office
upon audit of the income tax returns involved.

    Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied

concerning the tax consequences of any item discussed or referenced in this letter. In
particular, we express no opinion with respect to whether Parent qualifies substantively
to make the Election. In addition, we express no opinion as to the tax effects or
consequences of filing the Election late under the provisions of any other section of the
Internal Revenue Code or regulations, or as to the tax treatment of any conditions
existing at the time of, or resulting from, filing the Election late that are not specifically
set forth in this letter.

  For purposes of granting relief under § 301.9100-3, we relied on certain

statements and representations made under penalty of perjury by Parent and Company
PLR-126209-15 5

Official & Tax Professional. The Director, however, should verify all essential facts. In
addition, notwithstanding that an extension is granted under § 301.9100-3 to file the
Election, any penalties and interest that would otherwise be applicable continue to
apply.

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of

the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

   Pursuant to the power of attorney on file in this office, copies of this letter are

being sent to your authorized representatives.

                                Sincerely,


                                __________________
                                Ken Cohen
                                Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
                                Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)

~~~

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2016, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.