🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 201610014 Released March 4, 2016 Approved

Parent receives more time to file LIFO elections for subsidiaries

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2016
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A corporate parent transferred LIFO inventory to newly created subsidiaries in a restructuring and continued using the same LIFO method for tax and financial reporting. Its outside advisers did not tell it that separate Forms 970 were required for the subsidiaries, and the return preparer did not prepare them. The parent discovered the omission and promptly requested relief. The IRS found the regulatory-election relief standards satisfied and granted 30 days to file the missing Forms 970, without ruling on whether the LIFO method or restructuring was otherwise correct.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the parent make late LIFO elections for two subsidiaries that received inventory in a restructuring?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 30 days to file the missing Forms 970.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 472; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.472-3 and 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

~~~
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201610014 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 3/4/2016 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.11-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------------- ---------------, ID No. ----------
Attn: ----------------------------------------------------- Telephone Number/Fax Number:
-------------------------------------- -------------------- --------------------
--------------------------- Refer Reply To:
------------------------- CC:ITA:B6
PLR-128761-15
Date:
December 03, 2015

Legend

Parent = ---------------------------- ------- -

Taxpayer1 = -------------------------------------
------ ----------------

Taxpayer2 = ------------------------------------------

Products = -----------------------------------------------------------------------

                                         -----------

Activities = ----------------------------------

Year1 = ----------------------------------------------

Year2 = ------

Year3 = ------

Year4 = ------

B = -------------------------
PLR-128761-15 2

C = ----------------------

D = ---------------

Operations1 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------


Operations2 = -------------------------------------------------------

LLC1 = --------------------------------------------------------

LLC2 = ---------------------------------------

LLC3 = --------------------------------------------------

Corp = ---------------------------------

Date1 = ---------------------

Dear ----------------:

This letter is in reply to a private letter ruling request dated August 25, 2015, filed by
Parent on behalf of Taxpayer1 and Taxpayer2, requesting an extension of time under
§ 301.9100-1 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file Forms 970,
Application To Use LIFO Inventory Method, to use the last-in first-out (LIFO) inventory
method of accounting effective for Year1.

Parent is a designer and manufacturer of Products. Prior to Year1, Parent used the
LIFO method of accounting for inventory used in Activities.

In Year2, Parent underwent a restructuring of its domestic and international operations
(the Restructuring). B and C advised Parent concerning the planning and
implementation of the Restructuring. D prepared the federal income tax returns and
audited Parent’s financial statements for all relevant years to this request. Prior to
Year3, Parent did not have full-time, in-house tax resources and relied exclusively on
the advice and expertise of B, C, and D for tax matters.
PLR-128761-15 3

Parent represents that the Restructuring was designed to be a set of transactions with
several new subsidiaries formed and capitalized that qualified as tax-free exchanges
under § 351 of the Internal Revenue Code. Under the Restructuring, Parent created
Taxpayer1 and Taxpayer2.

Taxpayer1 was formed to hold Parent’s Operations1. Taxpayer2 was formed to hold
Parent’s Operations2. Taxpayer2 has three single member limited liability companies
(treated as disregarded entities for federal income tax purposes) and one corporation:
LLC1, LLC2, LLC3, and Corp. The operating agreements for Taxpayer1 and Taxpayer2
became effective on Date1.

As part of the Restructuring, Parent contributed its LIFO inventory to Taxpayer1, LLC1,
and LLC2. For federal income tax purposes, Taxpayer1, LLC1, and LLC2 continued to
identify the contributed inventory using the identical LIFO inventory method that had
been used by Parent.

However, with the Parent’s consolidated Form 1120, US Corporation Income Tax
Return, for Year1, Parent did not file the required Forms 970 for Taxpayer1 or
Taxpayer2. Parent was required by § 1.472-3(a) of the Income Tax Regulations to file
Forms 970 on behalf of Taxpayer1 and Taxpayer2 for Year1 in order to continue to
account for the contributed inventory on a LIFO basis after the Restructuring. Parent
represents that Taxpayer1 and Taxpayer2 used the LIFO inventory method described in
§ 472 for Year1 and used the LIFO inventory method for all subsequent tax years to
Year1. Parent also represents that the relevant LIFO inventory for Taxpayer1, LLC1,
and LLC2 was accounted for on the LIFO method for financial statement purposes for
Year1 and all subsequent fiscal years.

B and C did not advise Parent that Forms 970 were required to be filed to continue the
LIFO treatment for inventory contributed to Taxpayer1, LLC1, and LLC2 pursuant to the
Restructuring. Further, D did not prepare Forms 970 that were required to be filed with
Parent’s federal income tax return for Year1.

Parent recently discovered that Forms 970 had not been filed for Year1 for Taxpayer1
and Taxpayer2. When Parent determined that the Forms 970 had not been filed for
Taxpayer1 and Taxpayer2, D advised Parent to file this request. Parent promptly filed
this request on behalf of Taxpayer1 and Taxpayer2 for an extension of time to file the
Forms 970 to be effective for Year1 and all subsequent tax years.

Section 472 provides that a taxpayer may use the LIFO method in inventorying goods
specified in an application to use such method, filed at such time, and in such manner,
as the Secretary may prescribe.

Section 1.472-3 provides that the LIFO inventory method may be adopted and used
only if the taxpayer files with its income tax return for the tax year as of the close of
PLR-128761-15 4

which the method is first to be used a statement of its election to use such inventory
method. The statement is to be made on Form 970.

Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a
reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3
to make certain regulatory elections. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines a regulatory
election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the
Federal Register, or a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement
published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections.
Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do not meet
the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when a taxpayer provides
evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner (1) that the taxpayer acted
reasonably and in good faith, and (2) that granting relief will not prejudice the interests
of the government. See § 301.9100-3(a).

Section 301.9100-3(b)(1) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably
and in good faith if the taxpayer: (i) requests relief before the failure to make the
regulatory election is discovered by the Internal Revenue Service; (ii) failed to make the
election because of intervening events beyond the taxpayer’s control; (iii) failed to make
the election because, after exercising reasonable diligence, the taxpayer was unaware
of the necessity for the election; (iv) reasonably relied on the written advice of the
Service; or (v) reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, including a tax
professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to make, or
advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

Section 301.9100-3(b)(3) provides that a taxpayer is deemed not to have acted
reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer: (i) seeks to alter a return position for which
an accuracy-related penalty was or could be imposed under § 6662 at the time the
taxpayer requests relief and the new position requires or permits a regulatory election
for which relief is requested; (ii) was informed in all material respects of the required
election and related tax consequences and chose not to file the election; or (iii) uses
hindsight in requesting relief.

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i) provides, that the interests of the government are prejudiced
if granting relief would result in the taxpayer having a lower tax liability in the aggregate
for all tax years affected by the election than the taxpayer would have had if the election
had been timely made (taking into account the time value of money). The section also
provides that, if the tax consequences of more than one taxpayer are affected by the
election, the government’s interests are prejudiced if extending the time for making the
election may result in the affected taxpayers, in the aggregate, having a lower tax
PLR-128761-15 5

liability than if the election had been timely made.

Further, § 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) provides, in part, that the interests of the government are
ordinarily prejudiced if the tax year in which the regulatory election should have been
made, or any tax years that would have been affected by the election had it been timely
made, are closed by the period of limitations on assessment under § 6501(a) before the
taxpayer’s receipt of a ruling granting relief under this section.

The requested election is a regulatory election as defined under § 301.9100-1(b)
because the due date of the election is prescribed in § 1.472-3. Parent’s request is
analyzed under the requirements of § 301.9100-3 because the automatic provisions of
§ 301.9100-2 are not applicable.

On the basis of the facts, representations, and affidavits submitted, we conclude that
the requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Accordingly, we hereby grant an
extension of time for Parent to file the missing Forms 970 on behalf of Taxpayer1 and
Taxpayer2. This extension shall be for a period of 30 days from the date of this ruling.
Please attach a copy of this ruling to each Form 970 filed pursuant to this private letter
ruling request.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by Parent and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an
appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the materials submitted in
support of the request for a ruling, such material is subject to verification on
examination.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter. Specifically, we express no opinion as to whether Parent, Taxpayer1, or
Taxpayer2 (through LLC1 and LLC2) have correctly used the LIFO inventory method.
We also have no opinion as to the Restructuring of Parent that occurred in Year1;
specifically, whether the Restructuring qualified as a tax-free exchange under § 351.
Further, we have no opinion as to the correctness of the use of the LIFO inventory
method by any entity that may have obtained inventory in the Restructuring that
occurred during Year1 other than Taxpayer1, LLC1, and LLC2.

This ruling is directed only to Parent, who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that
it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-128761-15 6

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, copies of this letter are
being sent to Parent’s authorized representatives.

                                              Sincerely,


                                              CHERYL L. OSEEKEY
                                              Senior Counsel, Branch 6
                                              Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                              (Income Tax & Accounting)

Enclosure: copy for section 6110 purposes

cc:
~~~

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2016, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.