🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
WSBA 2001

Can a lawyer advance a client's living expenses as 'expenses of litigation' under Washington RPC 1.8(e)?

Short answer: No. The committee recommended that the phrase 'expenses of litigation' in RPC 1.8(e) not be modified or expanded to include a client's 'living expenses.'

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2001. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2001
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

RPC 1.8 addresses conflicts of interest and prohibited transactions with a client, and RPC 1.8(e) governs a lawyer's advances of financial assistance to a client in connection with litigation. The question was whether the rule's reference to "expenses of litigation" reached a client's living expenses.

The committee recommended that the phrase "expenses of litigation" as used in RPC 1.8(e) not be modified or expanded to include the "living expenses" of a client.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2001, before the Washington State Bar Association's adoption of the 2006 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Does "expenses of litigation" under RPC 1.8(e) include a client's living expenses?

A: No. The committee recommended that the phrase not be modified or expanded to include a client's living expenses.

Q: Which rule governs a lawyer's advances of financial assistance to a client in litigation?

A: The committee identified RPC 1.8, which addresses conflicts of interest and prohibited transactions with a client, and specifically RPC 1.8(e) on expenses of litigation.

Background and rules framework

The opinion interprets Washington RPC 1.8(e) (corresponding to Model Rule 1.8(e)), the provision on a lawyer's financial assistance to a client in connection with pending or contemplated litigation. The committee read the rule's term "expenses of litigation" narrowly, declining to expand it to cover a client's living expenses. RPC 1.8 generally addresses conflicts of interest and prohibited transactions between a lawyer and client.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • Model Rule 1.8 / Washington RPC 1.8(e) (financial assistance to a client in connection with litigation)

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

Advisory Opinion: 1945
Year Issued: 2001
RPC(s): RPC 1.8(e)
Subject: Lawyer advances or guarantees of financial assistance to clients during litigation

It is the recommendation of the Rules of Professional Conduct Committee that, with reference to RPC 1.8 that deals with conflicts of interest and prohibited transactions with a client, the phrase "expenses of litigation" as used in RPC 1.8(e) should not be modified or expanded to include "living expenses" of a client.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2001 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.