🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
WSBA 1993

Can a lawyer refer to a co-owner of a professional service corporation as 'my partner' even though they are technically co-shareholders?

Short answer: The committee concluded that RPC 7.5(d) treats partners and corporate shareholders the same, so there is no violation in a lawyer referring to a co-shareholder as 'my partner.'

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1993. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1993
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A lawyer asked about referring to the co-owner of a professional service corporation as "my partner," even though they are more properly co-shareholders or co-directors. The committee was of the opinion that RPC 7.5(d) treats partners and corporate shareholders as the same, and therefore there is no violation of the rule in referring to a co-shareholder as "my partner."

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1993, before the Washington State Bar Association's adoption of the 2006 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Can lawyers in a professional corporation call each other 'partner'?

A: The committee said yes; RPC 7.5(d) treats partners and corporate shareholders the same, so there is no violation in referring to a co-shareholder as "my partner."

Q: Does the corporate form change the answer?

A: No. The committee read RPC 7.5(d) as treating partners and shareholders alike for this purpose.

Background and rules framework

The opinion applied RPC 7.5(d) (corresponding to ABA Model Rule 7.5), which addresses how lawyers may state or imply that they practice in a partnership or organization. The committee read the rule as treating partners and shareholders of a professional corporation equivalently, so "partner" did not misstate the relationship.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • ABA Model Rule 7.5 (firm names and letterheads; statements about practicing together); Washington RPC 7.5(d)

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

Advisory Opinion: 1553
Year Issued: 1993
RPC(s): RPC 7.5(d)
Subject: Calling co-shareholder "partner"

The Committee reviewed your inquiry concerning reference to the co-owner of your professional service corporation as "my partner" even though you are more properly co-shareholders or co-directors. The Committee was of the opinion that RPC 7.5(d) treats partners and corporate shareholders as the same, and therefore, there is no violation of the rule to refer to your co-shareholder as "my partner".

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1993 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.