🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
WSBA 1993

Can a lawyer pay part of a consultation fee back to a nonprofit lawyer referral service that sent the client?

Short answer: The committee concluded the proposed fee split with a not-for-profit lawyer referral service is allowed under the rules so long as the service becomes 'duly authorized' as RPC 1.5(e) requires.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1993. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1993
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A lawyer proposed establishing a not-for-profit lawyer referral service that would refer a prospective client to a registered attorney on a rotating basis. The client using the service would pay a registered attorney a $40 flat fee for a half-hour consultation; the attorney would retain $20 and mail $20 to the referral service. The lawyer asked whether the proposed service violated RPC 1.5(e)(1).

The committee was of the opinion that the proposal is allowed by the rules, so long as the lawyer referral service becomes "duly authorized" as required by RPC 1.5(e).

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1993, before the Washington State Bar Association's adoption of the 2006 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Can a lawyer return part of a consultation fee to a referral service?

A: The committee was of the opinion that the proposed split (attorney keeps $20 of a $40 fee, sends $20 to the service) is allowed by the rules, subject to one condition.

Q: What is the condition?

A: The lawyer referral service must become "duly authorized" as required by RPC 1.5(e).

Background and rules framework

The opinion applied RPC 1.5(e) and RPC 1.5(e)(1), which govern the division of fees and the conditions for paying a lawyer referral service, corresponding to ABA Model Rule 1.5. The committee allowed the rotating-referral fee arrangement on the condition that the referral service itself become duly authorized under the rule.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • ABA Model Rule 1.5 (fees; division of fees); Washington RPC 1.5(e) and RPC 1.5(e)(1)

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

Advisory Opinion: 1511
Year Issued: 1993
RPC(s): RPC 1.5(e)
Subject: Division of fees with lawyer referral service

The Committee reviewed your inquiry wherein you proposed a not for profit lawyer referral service be established which would refer a prospective client to a registered attorney on a rotating basis. The client utilizing the service would pay a registered attorney a $40 flat fee for one-half hour of consultation. The registered attorney would retain $20 and mail $20 to the lawyer referral service. You inquired whether or not the proposed lawyer referral service violated RPC 1.5(e)(1). The Committee was of the opinion that the proposal is allowed by the Rules, so long as the lawyer referral service becomes "duly authorized" as required by 1.5(e).

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1993 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.