🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
WSBA 1992

If a lawyer is hired by a nonprofit to give its members basic legal advice, can the lawyer take on related matters for those members for a fee?

Short answer: The committee concluded that nothing in the rules would prohibit the lawyer from undertaking such fee-paid representation of the members on related matters, provided the lawyer otherwise complied with the solicitation rules in Title 7 of the RPCs.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1992. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1992
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A lawyer was employed by a nonprofit corporation to provide rudimentary legal advice to the organization's members concerning the Crime Victims' Compensation Act and other matters. The lawyer asked whether he could undertake to represent those members on related matters for which he would be paid a fee.

The committee was of the opinion that nothing in the Rules of Professional Conduct would prohibit the lawyer from undertaking such representation, provided that he otherwise complied with the solicitation rules in Title 7 of the RPCs.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1992, before the 2006 revisions to the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Can a lawyer paid by a nonprofit to advise its members also take their related cases for a fee?

A: The committee was of the opinion that nothing in the rules would prohibit it, provided the lawyer otherwise complied with the solicitation rules in Title 7 of the RPCs.

Q: What is the condition the committee attached?

A: Compliance with the solicitation rules in Title 7 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.

Background and rules framework

The opinion addressed solicitation under RPC 7.3 and the broader Title 7 advertising-and-solicitation rules, corresponding to ABA Model Rule 7.3. The committee found no categorical bar to a lawyer who provides basic advice to a nonprofit's members later representing those members for a fee on related matters, conditioning that conclusion on compliance with the solicitation rules.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • ABA Model Rule 7.3 (solicitation of clients)
  • Washington RPC 7.3 and Title 7 (advertising and solicitation)

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

Advisory Opinion: 1447
Year Issued: 1992
RPC(s): RPC 7.3
Subject: Solicitation; lawyer employed by non-profit to provide legal advice to members may represent members on related matters for fee

The Committee reviewed your inquiry concerning your employment by a non-profit corporation to provide rudimentary legal advice to members of the organization concerning the Crime Victim's Compensation Act, and other matters. Your question concerned whether you may undertake to provide representation to those persons on related matters for which you would be paid a fee.

The Committee was of the opinion that nothing in the Rules of Professional Conduct would prohibit you from undertaking such representation, provided that you otherwise complied with the solicitation rules in Title 7 of the RPCs.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1992 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.