🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
WSBA 1991

Can a lawyer give a prosecutor client information to rebut a former client's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel?

Short answer: The committee was of the opinion that, on the facts presented, RPC 1.6 requires the lawyer not to disclose confidences or secrets of the former client to the prosecuting attorney unless ordered to do so by a court.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1991. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1991
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The inquiry concerned a request by a prosecuting attorney that the lawyer respond to allegations of having provided ineffective assistance of counsel to a former client by disclosing client information to the prosecuting attorney. The committee was of the opinion that, under the facts presented, RPC 1.6 would require the lawyer not to disclose confidences or secrets of the former client unless the lawyer were so ordered by a court.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1991, before the Washington State Bar Association's adoption of the 2006 revisions to the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Can a lawyer share a former client's information with the prosecutor to rebut an ineffective-assistance claim?

A: Under this 1991 opinion, not on these facts; the committee was of the opinion that RPC 1.6 requires not disclosing the former client's confidences or secrets unless ordered by a court.

Q: What would allow disclosure?

A: The committee identified a court order as the condition; absent that, the lawyer was not to disclose the confidences to the prosecuting attorney.

Background and rules framework

At the time of this opinion, Washington's RPC 1.6 governed confidentiality, including any self-defense exception, and RPC 1.3 required diligence, the subjects the Model Rules place in Rules 1.6 and 1.3. On the facts presented, the committee read RPC 1.6 to bar voluntary disclosure to the prosecutor absent a court order.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • ABA Model Rule 1.3 (diligence)
  • ABA Model Rule 1.6 (confidentiality)
  • Washington RPC 1.3, 1.6

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

The Committee reviewed your inquiry concerning a request by a Prosecuting Attorney that you respond to allegations that you provided ineffective assistance of counsel to a former client by disclosing client information to the Prosecuting Attorney. The Committee was of the opinion that under the facts presented, RPC 1.6 would require that you not disclose confidences or secrets of your former client unless you were so ordered by a court.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1991 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.