Can a lawyer pay a paraprofessional employee a salary calculated from the money received in escrow closings?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1991. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The committee was of the opinion that RPC 5.4(a) would prohibit a lawyer from paying a paraprofessional employee a salary based upon money received in an escrow closing, because such a payment would constitute fee splitting with a nonlawyer.
Currency note
This opinion was issued in 1991, before the Washington State Bar Association's adoption of the 2006 revisions to the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.
Common questions
Q: Can a paralegal's salary be tied to escrow-closing receipts?
A: Under this 1991 opinion, no; the committee was of the opinion that RPC 5.4(a) prohibits it because such a payment would constitute fee splitting with a nonlawyer.
Q: Why is a receipts-based salary treated as fee splitting?
A: The committee viewed paying a nonlawyer a salary measured by money received in closings as sharing legal fees with a nonlawyer, which RPC 5.4(a) prohibits.
Background and rules framework
At the time of this opinion, Washington's RPC 5.4(a) prohibited a lawyer from sharing legal fees with a nonlawyer, the subject the Model Rules place in Rule 5.4. The committee treated compensation calculated from escrow-closing receipts as a forbidden split rather than ordinary salary.
Citations and references
Rules of Professional Conduct:
- ABA Model Rule 5.4 (sharing fees with a nonlawyer)
- Washington RPC 5.4(a)
See also
Source
- Landing page: https://ao.wsba.org/print.aspx?ID=466
Original opinion text
Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.
The Committee was of the opinion that RPC 5.4(a) would prohibit a lawyer from paying a paraprofessional employee a salary based upon money received in an escrow closing as such a payment would constitute fee splitting with a nonlawyer.
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 1991 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.