🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
WSBA 1989

If a law firm finds an overbalance in its trust account that may be unwithdrawn earned fees, can it simply take the money, and who pays to prove the fees were earned?

Short answer: The committee was of the opinion that before taking trust-account funds as earned fees, the firm bears the burden of demonstrating its right to claim ownership, and that any auditing or accounting costs to establish that right cannot be charged against the trust funds but must be borne by the firm directly.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1989. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1989
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The inquiry concerned disposition of funds in a trust account that the firm believed might be the result of a failure to withdraw earned fees. The committee was of the opinion that before the firm could take those funds as earned fees, the burden is on the firm to demonstrate its right to claim ownership of them as earned fees.

The committee was further of the opinion that any costs of auditing or accounting to establish that ownership right could not be charged against the funds held in the trust account, but must be borne by the firm directly.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1989, before the Washington State Bar Association's adoption of the 2006 revisions to the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Can a firm just sweep a trust-account overbalance it thinks is unwithdrawn fees?

A: Under this 1989 opinion, no, not without first carrying its burden. The committee was of the opinion that the firm must demonstrate its right to claim ownership of the funds as earned fees before taking them.

Q: Who pays for the accounting needed to prove the fees were earned?

A: The firm. The committee was of the opinion that auditing or accounting costs to establish the ownership right cannot be charged against the trust funds and must be borne by the firm directly.

Background and rules framework

At the time of this opinion, Washington's RPC 1.14 governed the safekeeping of client property, the subject the current Model Rules place in Rule 1.15. The committee applied it to a trust-account overbalance: funds in trust are presumptively protected, so the firm carries the burden of proving any claim to them as earned fees and absorbs the cost of doing so rather than charging it to the trust.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • ABA Model Rule 1.15 (safekeeping property)
  • Washington RPC 1.14 (as numbered at the time of the opinion)

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

The Committee reviewed your inquiry concerning disposition of funds in your trust account which you believe may be the result of failure to withdraw earned fees. The Committee was of the opinion that before your law firm could take those funds as earned fees, the burden is on your firm to demonstrate your right to claim ownership of them as earned fees. The Committee was further of the opinion that any costs of auditing or accounting to establish that ownership right could not be charged against those funds which are held in your trust account but must be borne by you directly.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1989 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.