🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
WSBA 1988

Does a lawyer have to keep client files forever, and when may old files be destroyed?

Short answer: The committee was of the opinion that a lawyer has no obligation to preserve client files forever, but before destroying a file the lawyer must determine whether anything in it could have a reasonably foreseeable benefit to the client; if so, it must be provided to the client or kept, and if not, the file may be destroyed.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1988. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1988
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The inquiry concerned the destruction of client files. The committee was of the opinion that a lawyer has no obligation to preserve client files forever.

Before destroying files, however, the committee said a lawyer has an obligation to determine whether anything in the file may have a reasonably foreseeable benefit to the client in the future. If so, the lawyer would be obligated either to provide it to the client or to retain it. If there was no such thing of reasonably foreseeable value or benefit to the client, then the files could be destroyed.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1988, before the 2006 revisions to the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct. The rule then numbered RPC 1.14, governing safekeeping of client property, corresponds to Model Rule 1.15 and was later renumbered and amended. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Does a lawyer have to keep closed client files forever?

A: No. The committee was of the opinion that a lawyer has no obligation to preserve client files forever.

Q: What must a lawyer do before destroying an old file?

A: Per the opinion, the lawyer must determine whether anything in the file may have a reasonably foreseeable benefit to the client in the future. The committee said that if there is, the lawyer is obligated to provide it to the client or to retain it.

Q: When may a file be destroyed?

A: The committee was of the opinion that if there is nothing in the file of reasonably foreseeable value or benefit to the client, the file could be destroyed.

Background and rules framework

The opinion addresses a lawyer's handling of client files under the rule then numbered Washington RPC 1.14, governing safekeeping of client property, which corresponds to Model Rule 1.15. The committee framed the analysis around a single factor: whether the file's contents have a reasonably foreseeable future benefit to the client. Material that does must be given to the client or kept; material that does not may be destroyed.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • Washington RPC 1.14 (safekeeping of client property), corresponding to Model Rule 1.15.

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

Advisory Opinion: 1185
Year Issued: 1988
RPC(s): RPC 1.14
Subject: Client property; client files; destruction.

The Committee considered your inquiry concerning the destruction of client files. The Committee was of the opinion that a lawyer has no obligation to preserve client files forever, but before destroying files, a lawyer has an obligation to determine whether anything in file may have a reasonably foreseeable benefit to the client in the future. If so, the lawyer would be obligated to either provide it to the client or retain it. However, if there was no such thing of reasonably foreseeable value or benefit to the client, then the files could be destroyed.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1988 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.