🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
WSBA 1988

Can a law firm include in its firm name the name of a lawyer who is not a partner of the firm?

Short answer: No. The committee was of the opinion that RPC 7.5(d) prohibits including a non-partner lawyer's name in the firm name, because it implies that those lawyers practice in a partnership when that is not the fact.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1988. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1988
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The inquiry concerned using the name of a lawyer in the law firm's name when that lawyer is not a partner of the firm.

The committee was of the opinion that RPC 7.5(d) prohibits such a practice, because it implies that those lawyers practice in a partnership when that is not the fact.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1988, before the 2006 revisions to the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct. The rule then numbered RPC 7.5(d), governing firm names and the implication of a partnership, corresponds to Model Rule 7.5(d) and was later amended. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Can a firm name include a lawyer who is not a partner?

A: Per the opinion, no. The committee was of the opinion that RPC 7.5(d) prohibits including a non-partner lawyer's name in the firm name.

Q: Why is that a problem under the rule?

A: Because it implies a partnership that does not exist. The committee tied the prohibition to the inference that the named lawyers practice in a partnership when that is not the fact.

Background and rules framework

The opinion applies the rule then numbered Washington RPC 7.5(d), corresponding to Model Rule 7.5(d), which bars lawyers from stating or implying that they practice in a partnership or other organization when that is not the fact. The committee read a firm name that includes a non-partner as making exactly that false implication.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • Washington RPC 7.5(d) (firm names; implying a partnership that does not exist), corresponding to Model Rule 7.5(d).

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

Advisory Opinion: 1183
Year Issued: 1988
RPC(s): RPC 7.5(d)
Subject: Firm name; inclusion of non-partner's name

The Committee reviewed your inquiry concerning the use of the name of a lawyer in the law firm when that lawyer is not a partner of the firm. The Committee was of the opinion that RPC 7.5(d) prohibits such a practice since it implies that those lawyers practice in a partnership when that is not the fact.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1988 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.