🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
WSBA 1986

Can a lawyer represent a fellow lawyer in the same firm in that firm member's own lawsuit?

Short answer: The committee concluded that RPC 3.7 would prohibit one lawyer in a firm from representing another lawyer in the same firm in litigation, in a case where the associate sued for specific performance of an earnest money agreement.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1986. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1986
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A lawyer represented an associate in his firm in a lawsuit for specific performance of an earnest money agreement. The committee was of the opinion that RPC 3.7 would prohibit one lawyer in a law firm from representing another lawyer in the same law firm in litigation as described in the inquiry.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1986, before the 2006 revisions to the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct. RPC 3.7 on a lawyer as a witness was later renumbered and amended. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Can one lawyer in a firm represent a colleague at the same firm in that colleague's lawsuit?

A: Under this opinion, no. The committee was of the opinion that RPC 3.7 would prohibit one lawyer in a law firm from representing another lawyer in the same firm in the litigation described.

Q: What was the underlying case?

A: The associate had sued for specific performance of an earnest money agreement, and a lawyer from the same firm proposed to represent him.

Background and rules framework

The opinion applies Washington RPC 3.7 on a lawyer as a witness, corresponding to Model Rule 3.7, to one firm lawyer representing another firm lawyer in litigation. The committee read the rule to prohibit that representation on the facts described.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • Washington RPC 3.7 (lawyer as a witness), corresponding to Model Rule 3.7.

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

Advisory Opinion: 1041
Year Issued: 1986
RPC(s): RPC 3.7
Subject: Lawyer as witness; representation of associate in litigation

The lawyer represented an associate in his firm in a lawsuit for specific performance of an Earnest Money Agreement. The Committee was of the opinion that RPC 3.7 would prohibit one lawyer in a law firm from representing another lawyer in the same law firm in litigation as described by you.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1986 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.