🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
WISBAR 1975

Can a law firm send its clients a private letter offering to match their charitable gifts to an educational institution?

Short answer: The opinion concluded that it could. A law firm's private letter offering, with a limit, to match clients' gifts to an educational institution violated no provision of the Code of Professional Responsibility, because the offer was private and not advertised in any public medium.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1975. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1975
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Opinion E-75-5 considered whether a law firm could make an offer, by letter to certain of its clients, to match the clients' gifts, with a limitation, to an educational institution. The committee concluded that the proposed action violated no Canon of the Code of Professional Responsibility nor any Ethical Consideration or Disciplinary Rule.

The committee emphasized the private nature of the offer. It noted there was no intent to advertise the matching offer in any medium of public communication; the proposal would be made privately, in a letter to a client. Limited to those terms, the committee's opinion was that the proposed action did not violate the Code.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1975, before Wisconsin's July 1, 2007 adoption of the revised Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys (the state's Ethics 2000 update), and it applies the former Code of Professional Responsibility. The current counterpart most relevant to the offer's private, non-public character is SCR 20:7.3 / Model Rule 7.3 (solicitation of clients). Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Can a law firm offer to match its clients' charitable donations?

A: Under this opinion, yes on these facts. The committee found a firm's offer, by private letter to certain clients, to match their limited gifts to an educational institution did not violate the Code of Professional Responsibility.

Q: Why did the committee approve the matching offer?

A: Because it was private. The committee stressed there was no intent to advertise the offer in any public medium and that the proposal would be made privately in a letter to a client, limiting its opinion to those terms.

Background and rules framework

The opinion applied the former Code of Professional Responsibility to a law firm's private charitable-matching offer, turning on whether the offer amounted to public advertising or solicitation. The current counterpart is SCR 20:7.3 / Model Rule 7.3 (solicitation of clients).

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • Model Rule 7.3 / SCR 20:7.3 (solicitation of clients); former Code of Professional Responsibility (Canons, Ethical Considerations, Disciplinary Rules) generally

See also

Source

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1975 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.