🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
RIEAP November 14, 1996

I am a lawyer and also the real estate broker for a client. May I serve as the attorney for a buyer or seller in a real estate transaction in which I am also that person's broker?

Short answer: The Panel concluded the Rules of Professional Conduct do not permit a lawyer to serve as the attorney for a buyer or seller in a real estate transaction in which the lawyer is also that individual's real estate broker.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The inquiring attorney was the president and principal real estate broker of a real estate company and also a title attorney. He asked whether he could serve as the attorney for an individual (either a buyer or a seller) in a real estate transaction in which he was also the real estate broker acting on behalf of that same individual.

The Panel answered no. It explained that the Rules of Professional Conduct permit a practicing lawyer to engage simultaneously in other businesses or professions, but in all such cases the Rules relating to transacting business with clients, advertising, soliciting legal employment, conflicts of interest, and confidentiality must be observed. The Panel found that the arrangement the inquiring attorney proposed could not be reconciled with those Rules.

The Panel grounded its conclusion in its recent Opinion 96-26, in which it had advised an attorney who was also an insurance broker that the Rules did not permit him to provide estate-planning legal services to his insurance customers. The Panel held that the rationale of Op. 96-26 applied here as well, and referred the inquiring attorney to that opinion. Accordingly, it responded in the negative.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1996 (Opinion 96-29, issued November 14, 1996), after the Rhode Island Supreme Court adopted the Model Rules of Professional Conduct effective November 15, 1988, and it applies the Rules governing outside businesses, conflicts of interest, and confidentiality as they stood at the time. The Rhode Island Supreme Court later revised the Rules of Professional Conduct in 2007 as part of the nationwide Ethics 2000 process, and the conflict-of-interest rules have been amended since. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Can a Rhode Island lawyer also work as a real estate broker?

A: The opinion did not bar practicing law and brokering real estate as such. It said a lawyer may simultaneously engage in another business, but must observe the Rules on business transactions with clients, advertising, solicitation, conflicts of interest, and confidentiality.

Q: Why can't the lawyer be both the broker and the attorney for the same buyer or seller?

A: The Panel concluded that dual role could not be reconciled with the Rules of Professional Conduct, applying the rationale of Op. 96-26, which had barred an attorney-insurance-broker from providing legal services to his insurance customers.

Q: Does the opinion point to a specific prior ruling?

A: Yes. It expressly relied on and referred the inquiring attorney to Op. 96-26, treating that opinion's reasoning as controlling on the same question.

Background and rules framework

The opinion did not cite a numbered rule. It enumerated the categories of Rules that govern a lawyer who simultaneously engages in another business (those relating to transacting business with clients, Model Rule 1.8 / RI RPC 1.8; advertising and solicitation, Model Rules 7.1 to 7.3 / RI RPC 7.1 to 7.3; conflicts of interest, Model Rule 1.7 / RI RPC 1.7; and confidentiality, Model Rule 1.6 / RI RPC 1.6) and concluded the proposed broker-and-attorney arrangement could not be reconciled with them. It adopted the reasoning of Op. 96-26, which had turned on the conflict and business-transaction rules.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • MR 1.7 / RI RPC 1.7 (conflicts of interest)
  • MR 1.8 / RI RPC 1.8 (transacting business with clients)
  • MR 1.6 / RI RPC 1.6 (confidentiality)

Other opinions cited:

  • RI EAP Opinion 96-26 (1996): a lawyer who is also an insurance broker may not provide estate-planning legal services to his insurance customers; its rationale controls the analogous broker-attorney question

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF. Minor errors may remain; the linked PDF is authoritative.

ETHICS ADVISORY PANEL
OPINION NO. 96-29, REQUEST NO. 690
Issued November 14, 1996

FACTS:

The inquiring attorney is the president and principal real estate broker of a real estate company. He is also a title attorney,

ISSUE PRESENTED:

The inquiring attorney asks whether he/she may serve as the attorney for an individual, either a buyer or a seller, in a real estate transaction in which he/she is the real estate broker on behalf of the individual.

OPINION:

The Rhode Island Supreme Court Rules of Professional Conduct do not permit the arrangement that the inquiring attorney proposes.

REASONING:

The Rules of Professional Conduct permit practicing lawyers to simultaneously engage in other businesses or professions. In all such cases, the Rules relating to transacting business with clients, advertising, soliciting legal employment, conflicts of interest, and confidentiality must be observed. See R.I. Sup. Ct. Ethics Advisory Panel Op. 96-26. However, the arrangement proposed by the inquiring attorney cannot be reconciled with the Rules of Professional Conduct.

In Ethics Advisory Panel Op. 96-26, the Panel recently advised an attorney who is an insurance broker of life, health, and accident insurance that the Rules of Professional Conduct do not permit him/her to provide estate planning legal services to his/her insurance customers. The rationale set forth in Ethics Advisory Panel Op. 96-26 is applicable to the instant request, and the Panel refers the inquiring attorney to that opinion.

Accordingly, the Panel responds to this inquiry in the negative, concluding that the Rules of Professional Conduct do not permit the inquiring attorney to serve as the attorney for an individual in a real estate transaction in which he/she is the real estate broker on behalf of the individual.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1996 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.