🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
RIEAP March 15, 1993

Can I advance the court costs and litigation expenses for indigent personal-injury clients and be reimbursed only if the case recovers?

Short answer: Yes. The Panel concludes that advancing court costs and litigation expenses, with repayment contingent on the outcome, is permitted under Rule 1.8(e)(1) as long as the advanced costs are related to the litigation.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1993. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1993
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An attorney proposed to represent several indigent plaintiffs in a personal-injury matter and, given the clients' age and poverty, to advance the costs of litigation and be reimbursed only if the claim resulted in a recovery.

The Panel applies Rule 1.8(e)(1), which allows a lawyer to advance court costs and expenses of litigation "the repayment of which may be contingent on the outcome of the matter." The opinion concludes that, as long as the advanced costs and expenses are related to the litigation, the attorney's proposed conduct is not inconsistent with the Rules of Professional Conduct.

In practice

Under this opinion, advancing court costs and litigation expenses on behalf of indigent clients, and tying repayment to a recovery in the same matter, falls within the express permission of Rule 1.8(e)(1). The opinion frames the analysis around one limitation: the advanced amounts must be costs and expenses related to the litigation.

Common questions

Q: Can a Rhode Island lawyer front litigation costs for a client who cannot afford them?

A: Yes. The opinion applies Rule 1.8(e)(1), under which a lawyer may advance court costs and expenses of litigation, and finds the attorney's proposal permissible.

Q: Can repayment of those advanced costs be made contingent on winning the case?

A: Yes. Rule 1.8(e)(1) allows the repayment of advanced court costs and expenses to be contingent on the outcome of the matter, and the opinion approves that arrangement.

Q: Is there any limit on what may be advanced?

A: The opinion conditions its conclusion on the advanced amounts being costs and expenses "related to the litigation."

Background and rules framework

The opinion interprets Rhode Island Rule of Professional Conduct 1.8(e)(1), the analog of Model Rule 1.8(e)(1), which appears under the heading "Conflict of Interest: Prohibited Transactions." That subparagraph permits a lawyer to advance court costs and expenses of litigation, the repayment of which may be contingent on the outcome of the matter.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • MR 1.8(e)(1) (advancing court costs and litigation expenses; repayment may be contingent on outcome)
  • RI RPC 1.8(e)(1) (same)

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

Final
ETHICS ADVISORY PANEL
Opinion #93-7, Request #337
Issued March 15, 1993

An attorney seeks Panel advice with regard to Rule 1.8 entitled "Conflict of Interest: Prohibited Transactions." The attorney would like to represent several indigent plaintiffs in a personal injury matter. Given the clients' age and poverty level, the attorney would advance the costs of litigation and would be reimbursed only if the claim results in recovery with regard to the claim.

Rule 1.8(e)(1) allows for an attorney to advance court costs and expenses of litigation. The Rule states that:

(1) A lawyer may advance court costs and expenses of litigation, the repayment of which may be contingent on the outcome of the matter;

As long as the advanced costs and expenses are related to the litigation the attorney's proposed conduct is not inconsistent with the Rules of Professional Conduct in this matter.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1993 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.