Oregon State Bar Ethics Opinions
Free plain-English summaries of legal ethics opinions issued by the Oregon State Bar, with full citations and source links on every page.
No Oregon State Bar opinions match these filters
Try a different search term or clear the filters.
Can a lawyer who used to work in the state appellate public defender's office take postconviction appeals alleging ineffective assistance by that office's lawyers?
Generally yes, with qualifications. The opinion concludes the lawyer may take such appeals, but a personal-interest conflict under Oregon RPC 1.7(a)(2) arises if loyalty to former colleagues would mat…
If a lawyer sends past clients periodic reminders about deadlines like patent maintenance fees or lease renewals, are those people current clients for conflict purposes?
They may be. The opinion concludes that, absent a clear written statement that no continuing relationship exists, recipients of periodic docket reminders can reasonably believe the lawyer-client relat…
Can a lawyer have a sexual relationship with a client during the representation, and can a lawyer represent someone with whom the lawyer already had a sexual relationship?
A lawyer may not begin sexual relations with a current client during the representation. A lawyer may continue a sexual relationship that existed before the representation, but only if the resulting p…
Can a part-time deputy district attorney take private clients in matters connected to cases the office is prosecuting?
No, while still in office. The opinion concludes a deputy DA may not represent a private party in a civil matter involving substantially the same controversy as a pending prosecution, under ORS 8.720 …
Does a legal aid program create a conflict when it screens applicants and refers them to a pro bono panel lawyer, even if the opposing party was already referred to another panel lawyer?
Generally no. The opinion concludes that intake information gathered by a legal aid screener is protected, but screening can prevent it from disqualifying the program's other lawyers and the pro bono …
Can a lawyer advise and represent a client in bankruptcy when the client owes the lawyer substantial fees that the bankruptcy would discharge?
Yes, qualified. The discharge of the lawyer's own fees creates a personal-interest conflict under RPC 1.7(a)(2), so the lawyer may advise and represent the client only with informed consent confirmed …
Can a lawyer represent a criminal defendant when a former client of the lawyer will testify as an expert witness for the prosecution?
No, qualified. A lawyer is not barred merely because a former client testifies adversely, but here the lawyer learned of the former client's wrongdoing during the earlier representation, making the ma…
When can an Oregon lawyer take a new case against a former client, and what counts as the same or a substantially related matter?
Not without consent. The opinion concludes that under Oregon RPC 1.9 a lawyer may not act against a former client in the same or a substantially related matter without each affected client's informed …
Browse Oregon State Bar opinions by topic
Legal ethics opinions from the Oregon State Bar interpret the rules of professional conduct for working lawyers, in response to inquiries from members and committees. They are not binding like court discipline decisions, but courts and discipline boards treat formal opinions as substantial guidance on how the rules apply. Every opinion above has a plain-English question and short answer, plus a link to the original source on the bar's site.