What political and campaign activities can an Ohio court magistrate take part in, and can a magistrate help the appointing judge's reelection?

Plain-English summary

The Board answered four questions about a magistrate's political and campaign activities. It started from the premise that full- and part-time magistrates appointed by judges are judicial officers subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct, so Canon 4 restricts their participation in the political process to keep them free from political influence and to protect judicial independence, integrity, and impartiality.

On contributions, the Board explained that a magistrate, like a judge, may generally contribute personal funds to any candidate for public office, with one significant exception: Jud. Cond. R. 4.4(C)(1) bars a judicial candidate's campaign committee from receiving, directly or indirectly, a contribution from any employee of a court the candidate serves or seeks election to, and magistrates are court employees within that prohibition. So a magistrate may contribute (subject to limits) to a judicial candidate running for a different court or division (Jud. Cond. R. 4.4(I)-(J)), and may contribute to a political party without restriction (Jud. Cond. R. 4.1(B)(3)).

On endorsements, the Board held that a magistrate may not publicly endorse or oppose any candidate for public office, including judicial office (Jud. Cond. R. 4.1(A)(3)), because doing so abuses the prestige of judicial office (Jud. Cond. R. 1.3); examples include allowing one's name on a fundraiser invitation or signing letters in support (In re Keys; Disciplinary Counsel v. Capers). The Board concluded that a personal-funds contribution does not itself constitute a public endorsement. On campaign work, it held that distributing literature door to door, speaking to voters, working a phone bank, or placing yard signs, even for the magistrate's own appointing judge, is public endorsement prohibited under Jud. Cond. R. 4.1(A)(2)-(3), and soliciting or receiving contributions for a candidate or party is likewise prohibited (Jud. Cond. R. 4.1(A)(4)); the appointing court should ensure magistrates are not involved in soliciting campaign funds. The opinion withdrew Advisory Opinions 1990-24 and 2002-13.

In practice

The opinion holds that, under the Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct as it stood at the time, a magistrate is a judicial officer bound by Canon 4: the magistrate may not contribute to the campaign committee of a judicial candidate for the same court or division to which the magistrate is appointed, may not publicly endorse or oppose any candidate, and may not solicit or receive campaign contributions for a candidate or party. Per the opinion, the magistrate may contribute personal funds to a political party, a nonjudicial candidate, or a judicial candidate in a different court or division, and a personal contribution is not itself an endorsement; but campaign work for the appointing judge (door-to-door literature, speaking to voters, phone banks, yard signs) is a prohibited public endorsement.

Common questions

Q: Can a magistrate donate to political candidates?

A: The opinion concluded a magistrate may contribute personal funds to a political party, a nonjudicial candidate, or a judicial candidate for a different court or division, but not to a judicial candidate for the court or division to which the magistrate is appointed (Jud. Cond. R. 4.4(C)(1)).

Q: Can a magistrate publicly endorse a candidate?

A: The opinion concluded no; a magistrate may not publicly endorse or oppose any candidate for public office, including judicial office, under Jud. Cond. R. 4.1(A)(3).

Q: Can a magistrate help the appointing judge's reelection campaign?

A: The opinion concluded no; distributing literature, speaking to voters, working a phone bank, or placing yard signs, even for the appointing judge, is a prohibited public endorsement.

Q: Can a magistrate solicit campaign contributions for others?

A: The opinion concluded no; soliciting or receiving contributions for a candidate or political party is prohibited under Jud. Cond. R. 4.1(A)(4).

Background and rules framework

The opinion interprets Ohio Jud. Cond. R. 4.1 (political and campaign activities of judges and judicial candidates in general) and 4.4 (campaign committees), together with the prestige-of-office limit in Jud. Cond. R. 1.3 and the impartiality/integrity duty in Jud. Cond. R. 1.1, as applied to magistrates as judicial officers under the Code's Application section (Model Code of Judicial Conduct Canon 4).

Citations and references

Rules of Judicial Conduct:

• Ohio Jud. Cond. R. 4.1 (political and campaign activities), incl. 4.1(A)(2)-(4), 4.1(B)(3) and cmts. [1], [4] (Model Code of Judicial Conduct Canon 4)
• Ohio Jud. Cond. R. 4.4 (campaign committees), incl. 4.4(C)(1), (I)-(J)
• Ohio Jud. Cond. R. 1.1, 1.3 (compliance with the law; avoiding abuse of the prestige of judicial office)

Cases:

• In re Keys, 80 Ohio Misc. 2d 1, 671 N.E.2d 1124 (1996), improper endorsement by a judicial officer
• Disciplinary Counsel v. Capers, 15 Ohio St.3d 122, 472 N.E.2d 1073 (1984)
• Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Neill, 103 Ohio St.3d 204, 2004-Ohio-4704, solicitation of campaign funds

Other opinions cited:

• Ohio BPC Adv. Op. 88-017: personal-funds campaign contributions under the former Code
• Ohio BPC Adv. Op. 2001-1: judicial officer's spouse placing a yard sign for the spouse's own candidacy

See also

• Ohio BPC Op. 2002-013: Magistrate Campaign Activities for the Appointing Judge (withdrawn by this opinion)
• Ohio BPC Op. 2003-008: Magistrate Campaign Photo, Title, and Political Funds
• Ohio BPC Op. 1988-017: Judicial Campaign Political Contributions

Source

• Landing page: https://ohioadvop.org/advisory-opinion-index/
• Original PDF: https://www.ohioadvop.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Adv-Op.-2018-04-Final.pdf

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

OPINION 2018-04
Issued August 3, 2018
(Withdraws Adv. Op. 1990-24, Adv. Op. 2002-13)

                Political and Campaign Activities of Magistrates

SYLLABUS: A magistrate may not make a contribution to the campaign committee of a
judicial candidate seeking office to the same court or division of a court to which the
magistrate is appointed. A magistrate may contribute personal funds to a political party,
a nonjudicial candidate, or to the campaign committee of judicial candidate who is
seeking election to a court or division of the court other than the one to which the
magistrate is appointed. A magistrate may not publicly endorse or oppose a candidate
for any public office, including an incumbent judge or a judicial candidate. A magistrate
may not solicit or receive campaign contributions on behalf of a political party or
candidate for any public office, including judicial office.

This nonbinding advisory opinion is issued by the Ohio Board of Professional Conduct
in response to a prospective or hypothetical question regarding the application of
ethics rules applicable to Ohio judges and lawyers. The Ohio Board of Professional
Conduct is solely responsible for the content of this advisory opinion, and the advice
contained in this opinion does not reflect and should not be construed as reflecting the
opinion of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Questions regarding this advisory opinion
should be directed to the staff of the Ohio Board of Professional Conduct.
65 SOUTH FRONT STREET, 5TH FLOOR, COLUMBUS, OH 43215-3431
Telephone: 614.387.9370 Fax: 614.387.9379
www.bpc.ohio.gov

DAVID L. DINGWELL RICHARD A. DOVE
CHAIR DIRECTOR
SANFORD E. WATSON D. ALLAN ASBURY
VICE- CHAIR SENIOR COUNSEL
KRISTI R. MCANAUL
COUNSEL

                                  OPINION 2018-04
                                Issued August 3, 2018
                 (Withdraws Adv. Op. 1990-24, Adv. Op. 2002-13)


                Political and Campaign Activities of Magistrates

SYLLABUS: A magistrate may not make a contribution to the campaign committee of a
judicial candidate seeking office to the same court or division of a court to which the
magistrate is appointed. A magistrate may contribute personal funds to a political party,
a nonjudicial candidate, or to the campaign committee of judicial candidate who is
seeking election to a court or division of the court other than the one to which the
magistrate is appointed. A magistrate may not publicly endorse or oppose a candidate
for any public office, including an incumbent judge or a judicial candidate. A magistrate
may not solicit or receive campaign contributions on behalf of a political party or
candidate for any public office, including judicial office.

QUESTIONS PRESENTED:

   1). Whether a magistrate may contribute personal funds to a nonjudicial candidate,

a judicial candidate, or a political party.

   2). Whether a magistrate may contribute personal funds to a judicial candidate

seeking election to another court or to a division of the court other than the division in
which the magistrate serves.
Op. 2018-4 2

   3). Whether a magistrate may endorse or oppose a candidate for any public office.


   4). Whether a magistrate may engage in campaign activities on behalf of his or her

appointing judge who is seeking reelection, such as soliciting funds, going door-to-door
to speak with voters, distributing campaign literature, placing yard signs, or participating
in a telephone bank.

APPLICABLE RULES: Jud.Cond.R. 1.1, 1.3, 4.1, 4.4

OPINION: As judicial officers, both full- and part-time magistrates appointed by judges
in municipal, common pleas, or appellate courts are subject to the Code of Judicial
Conduct. Jud.Cond.R., Application. Due to the unique nature of magistrates as judicial
officers and public employees, Canon 4 of the Code of Judicial Conduct restricts the
ability of a magistrate to participate in the political process. The restrictions in the Code
assist magistrates in remaining free from political influence and in upholding and
promoting the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judicial branch.
Jud.Cond.R. 4.1, cmt. [1], Canon 1, Preamble [2].

Campaign and political contributions

   With one significant exception, a magistrate, like a judge, may contribute personal

funds to any candidate for public office. The Code expressly prohibits the campaign
committee of a judicial candidate from receiving, directly or indirectly, a contribution
from any employee of a court on which the candidate serves or to which the candidate is
seeking election. Jud.Cond.R. 4.4(C)(1). Because magistrates are court employees, they
fall within the scope of the prohibition.

   Conversely, a magistrate may contribute personal funds, subject to the

contribution limits, to a judicial candidate seeking election to a court or division of a court
other than the court to which the magistrate serves. Jud.Cond.R. 4.4(I)-(J). In addition, a
magistrate may contribute personal funds to a political party without restriction under
the Code of Judicial Conduct. Jud.Cond.R. 4.1(B)(3); see Adv. Op. 88-017 (campaign
contributions of personal funds permitted under former Code of Judicial Conduct.)
Op. 2018-4 3

Endorsement of candidates for public office

    A magistrate may not publicly endorse or oppose any candidate for public office,

including judicial office. Jud.Cond.R. 4.1(A)(3). Public opposition or endorsement by a
magistrate of a candidate for public office abuses the prestige of judicial office held by
the magistrate to advance the private interests of others. Jud.Cond.R. 1.3; Jud.Cond.R. 4.1,
cmt. [4]. For example, an improper endorsement occurs if a magistrate allows his or her
name to be placed on an invitation to a candidate’s fundraiser or signs and mails letters
and cards in support of a candidate. In re Keys (1996), 80 Ohio Misc. 2d 1, 671 N.E.2d
1124; Disciplinary Counsel v. Capers (1984), 15 Ohio St.3d 122, 472 N.E.2d 1073. In terms of
campaign contributions, the Board concludes that a magistrate’s contribution of personal
funds to a candidate for public office does not constitute a public endorsement of the
candidate.

Participation in campaign activities and solicitation of campaign contributions on behalf of
candidates

    When a magistrate distributes campaign literature door-to-door, speaks to voters,

participates in a campaign phone bank, or places yard signs on behalf of any candidate
for public office, including his or her appointing judge, he or she is publicly endorsing
the candidate.1 When undertaken by a magistrate, participation in these types of
activities demonstrates public approval and support for a candidate, and consequently is
prohibited by the Code as an improper endorsement. Jud.Cond.R. 4.1(A)(2)-(3). An
improper endorsement also occurs if a magistrate solicits or receives contributions from
others for or on behalf of a campaign committee of any candidate for public office or a
political party. Jud.Cond.R. 4.1(A)(4). The appointing court should ensure that its
magistrates are not involved in the receipt or solicitation of campaign fund contributions
on behalf of any candidate for judicial or nonjudicial office. See generally, Disciplinary
Counsel v. O'Neill, 103 Ohio St.3d 204, 2004-Ohio-4704.

1 For the circumstance in which a judicial officer’s spouse is a candidate for public office, see Adv. Op.
2001-1 (no violation of Judicial Code if a judicial officer’s spouse places a yard sign supporting the spouse’s
candidacy for public office.)
Op. 2018-4 4

CONCLUSION: Magistrates are judicial officers subject to the Code, including the
restrictions on political and campaign activities. Because magistrates are also judicial
appointees, the Code imposes additional limitations on their political and campaign
activities. The Code prohibits the campaign committee of a judicial candidate from
receiving, directly or indirectly, a contribution from any employee from the same court
or division the candidate serves or is seeking election. However, a magistrate may
contribute personal funds to the campaigns of other judicial candidates in other courts or
other divisions of a court in which they serve, nonjudicial candidates, or political parties.
As a judicial officer, a magistrate may not endorse or oppose any candidate for public
office, including his or her incumbent judge. This restriction requires the magistrate to
refrain from engaging in campaign activities including, but not limited to, soliciting or
receiving campaign contributions on behalf of a political party or candidate for any public
office, the distribution of campaign literature, speaking with voters, participating in a
campaign phone bank, or placing yard signs on behalf of any candidate for public office.