🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
NJACPE September 21, 1972

Can a lawyer advertise services like tracing heirs for title clearance to the public, or announce that availability to other lawyers in a legal journal?

Short answer: Advertising such services to the general public is improper, but the opinion concluded a lawyer may publish a dignified announcement of his availability as a consultant or associate to other lawyers in a legal journal, without claiming special competence and no more than once a year.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1972. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1972
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A New Jersey attorney asked whether he could advertise, in the New Jersey Law Journal or other papers, offering his services in tracing heirs in connection with the clearance of land titles.

The Committee concluded that such advertisement directed to the general public would clearly be improper under DR 2-101 and DR 2-105, so it could not be placed in "other papers" or otherwise directed to the public. It read the inquiry to also ask whether a professional announcement on the subject could be directed to other lawyers through the New Jersey Law Journal, and concluded that it could, so long as the announcement follows DR 2-105(A)(3): a lawyer available to act as a consultant to or associate of other lawyers in a particular branch of law may publish in legal journals a dignified announcement of that availability, without representing special competence or experience, and not more than once in a calendar year.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1972, before New Jersey's adoption of the 2004 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct, and predates the 1984 replacement of the Disciplinary Rules by the RPCs. Lawyer-advertising restrictions of this kind were substantially changed after Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350 (1977), and later rule revisions; lawyer communications about services are now governed by RPC 7.1 and RPC 7.2. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Could the lawyer advertise heir-tracing services to the public?

A: No. The Committee said advertising directed to the general public would clearly be improper under DR 2-101 and DR 2-105.

Q: Could he announce the service to other lawyers instead?

A: Yes. Under DR 2-105(A)(3) he could publish in a legal journal a dignified announcement of his availability as a consultant or associate, with limits.

Q: What limits applied to the announcement to lawyers?

A: It could not represent special competence or experience, and could not be distributed to lawyers more than once in a calendar year, though it could be published periodically in a legal journal.

Background and rules framework

The opinion applied DR 2-101 (publicity) and DR 2-105 (availability and specialization) to a lawyer's proposed announcement of a niche service. In current New Jersey terms, lawyer communications about services are governed by RPC 7.1 and RPC 7.2.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • DR 2-101 and DR 2-105(A)(3), as in effect 1972; now MR 7.1 / 7.2 and NJ RPC 7.1 / 7.2

Cases:

  • Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350 (U.S. 1977), holding (after this opinion) that blanket bans on lawyer advertising violate the First Amendment

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from a full-text mirror of the official opinion for research purposes. The linked official source controls.

95 N.J.L.J. 973, September 21, 1972

OPINION 242

Professional Announcement - Legal Service

A New Jersey attorney asks if he may properly advertise in the New Jersey Law Journal or other papers offering his services in tracing heirs in connection with the clearance of land titles.

It is our opinion that such advertisement directed to the general public would clearly be improper (DR 2-101 and 2-105). Hence, such advertising may not be placed in "other papers" or otherwise directed to the public. The inquiry, however, may be construed also to inquire as to whether a professional announcement on this subject may be directed to other lawyers through insertion in the New Jersey Law Journal. It is our opinion that it may, so long as the announcement follows the mandate of DR 2-105,(A) 3 which reads as follows:

A lawyer available to act as a consultant to or as an associate of other lawyers in a particular branch of law or legal service may distribute to other lawyers and publish in legal journals a dignified announcement of such availability, but the announcement shall not contain a representation of special competence or experience. The announcement shall not be distributed to lawyers more frequently than once in a calendar year, but it may be published periodically in legal journal.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1972 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.