🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
FLBAR June 7, 1968

Can a creditor's attorney send a debtor a 'Final Notice Before Action' form?

Short answer: The opinion concluded that an attorney representing a creditor may not use a 'Final Notice Before Action' form, because the form is designed to mislead debtors who are not represented by counsel.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1968. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current Florida Rules of Professional Conduct, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1968
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An attorney who represented creditors asked whether he could properly use a form entitled "Final Notice Before Action," which he attached to his inquiry. The form recited an unpaid debt, demanded payment by a stated date, warned that suit would be brought without further notice, and was captioned "THIS IS A LEGAL TEN DAY NOTICE," followed by a creditor's affidavit and a notary block.

The committee concluded that use of the form violated Canon 9 because it was manifestly designed to mislead parties not represented by counsel. The committee also cited Opinion 178 of the American Bar Association Committee on Professional Ethics.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1968, before The Florida Bar's adoption of the 2006 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct. It applied the former Canon 9 on communicating with parties and the duty not to mislead unrepresented persons. A lawyer's duties toward an unrepresented person are now addressed by Rule 4-4.3. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against the current rules before relying on any specific requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Can a lawyer collecting a debt send an unrepresented debtor a form that looks like a court paper?

A: Under this opinion, no, where the form is designed to mislead. The committee found the "Final Notice Before Action" form, labeled "THIS IS A LEGAL TEN DAY NOTICE," was manifestly designed to mislead debtors who were not represented by counsel and violated Canon 9.

Q: What rule did the committee apply?

A: The committee applied the former Canon 9 and cited ABA Opinion 178. The duty not to mislead an unrepresented person now appears in Rule 4-4.3 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar.

Background and rules framework

The opinion applied the former Canon 9, which governed a lawyer's dealings with parties and the duty not to mislead persons who were not represented by counsel. A lawyer's obligations toward an unrepresented person are now addressed by Rule 4-4.3 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar; the Model Rule analogue is Rule 4.3.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • Canon 9 [Canons of Professional Ethics; duty toward unrepresented persons now in Rule 4-4.3]

Other opinions cited:

  • ABA Committee on Professional Ethics Opinion 178: misleading collection forms

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

FLORIDA BAR ETHICS OPINION
OPINION 68-26
June 7, 1968
Advisory ethics opinions are not binding.
An attorney representing a creditor may not send a debtor a form styled "Final Notice Before Action" because the form clearly is designed to mislead parties not represented by counsel.
Canon: 9
Opinion: ABA 178
Chairman MacDonald stated the opinion of the committee:
A member of The Florida Bar inquires as to whether he may properly use a form entitled "Final Notice Before Action," a copy of which is attached to this opinion. We think that the use of this form is violative of Canon 9 because it is manifestly designed to mislead parties not represented by counsel. See also Opinion 178 of the American Bar Association Committee on Professional Ethics.
FINAL NOTICE BEFORE ACTION
__Creditor
versus
____Debtor
To the above Debtor:
You are hereby notified that the above named creditor claims an unpaid indebtedness against you in the amount of _ dollars ($_). Furthermore, the same is past due and that legal demand has been made upon you for payment according to the terms of your note dated _ in favor of _ and now legally owned and held by above creditor, who is located at ______
, City of __, State of _.
You are further notified that in the event that you do not make full and complete settlement of said claim or provision for adjustment thereof on or before the _ day of _ A.D., 19, at A.M. o'clock of said day, that suit will be brought without further notice for the entire amount specified above together with all costs and attorney fees or other expense of said action as provided by the terms of your note.
THIS IS A LEGAL TEN DAY NOTICE
Dated this __
day of _, in the Year of Our Lord, One Thousand Nine Hundred and _.


Attorney
AFFIDAVIT ON ABOVE CLAIM
STATE OF__
COUNTY OF__
CITY OF__

__, being first duly sworn, states that he is the Creditor mentioned in above notice and that there is due him from above mentioned debtor the sum of $__.
___(SEAL)
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
day of __, 19


Notary Public

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1968 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Florida Rules of Professional Conduct and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.