🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Federal agency decisions, searchable in plain English.

Workplace-safety cases from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) and mine-safety cases from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC), each with a plain-English summary, the standards it cites, and whether it counts as precedent. More agencies are coming.

5,577 decisions and counting · Latest decision July 17, 2026
5 decisions 30 U.S.C. § 813(f)

No decisions match these filters

Try a different search term or clear the filters.

ALJ

Secretary of Labor v. Warrior Met Coal Mining, LLC

Secretary of Labor v. Warrior Met Coal Mining (FMSHRC SE 2023-0146): Summary decision denied and amended answer allowed

The Secretary alleged that Warrior Met interfered with Mine Act walkaround rights by pursuing state-court contempt sanctions connected to union representatives' efforts to accompany MSHA inspections during a strike. She sought summary decision based largely on facts stated in the pleadings. The…

November 17, 2023 ·Thomas P. McCarthy
Procedural
COMM

Secretary of Labor on behalf of Tara Otten v. Continental Cement Company, LLC

Secretary of Labor on behalf of Tara Otten v. Continental Cement Company, LLC (FMSHRC CENT 2021-0013): Original release of walkaround pay decision

This is the original release of the Commission's decision affirming Tara Otten's walkaround-pay claim against Continental Cement. Otten received her regular laborer rate instead of the higher mobile-equipment rate she would otherwise have earned while accompanying MSHA inspectors. The Commission…

May 8, 2023
Citations affirmed
COMM

Secretary of Labor on behalf of Tara Otten v. Continental Cement Company, LLC

Secretary of Labor on behalf of Tara Otten v. Continental Cement Company, LLC (FMSHRC CENT 2021-0013): Walkaround representative was entitled to lost upgrade pay

Tara Otten served as a miners' representative during MSHA inspections and was paid her regular laborer rate instead of the higher mobile-equipment rate she would otherwise have earned. Continental Cement relied on its collective bargaining agreement, which tied upgrade pay to actually performing…

May 8, 2023
Citations affirmed
ALJ

Warrior Met Coal Mining, LLC v. Secretary of Labor and Secretary of Labor v. Warrior Met Coal Mining, LLC

Warrior Met Coal Mining, LLC v. Secretary of Labor (FMSHRC SE 2023-0028): Eighteen dockets dismissed

The Acting Secretary vacated five contest citations and thirteen related penalty proceedings alleging that Warrior Met denied miners' representatives access to its No. 4 and No. 7 mines during a strike. Warrior Met did not oppose dismissal but asked the Judge first to consolidate those eighteen…

April 28, 2023 ·Thomas P. McCarthy
Citations vacated
ALJ

Secretary of Labor on behalf of Tara Otten v. Continental Cement Company, LLC

Secretary of Labor on behalf of Tara Otten v. Continental Cement Company, LLC (FMSHRC CENT 2021-0013): Walkaround representative awarded lost upgrade pay

Tara Otten was a laborer and miners' representative at Continental Cement's Hannibal Underground Mine. While she accompanied MSHA inspectors, the company paid her regular laborer rate instead of the higher mobile-equipment rate she would have received under its seniority practices if she had…

February 28, 2022 ·William B. Moran
Citations affirmed

What these documents are

  • Commission decisions: Rulings by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission itself, the highest level of agency review. These are citable as Commission precedent, though a decision may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance.
  • ALJ decisions: Rulings by OSHRC Administrative Law Judges after a hearing. When no Commissioner directs review, an ALJ decision becomes a final order under 29 U.S.C. § 661(j): it binds the parties in that case but is not binding precedent in other cases.
  • Why finality matters: Every page here says which kind of decision you are reading, so you know whether it is precedent you can cite or a final order that only shows how one judge ruled on one set of facts.
  • Where they come from: Every page links the official OSHRC public release, and the full text on the page is that release. The plain-English summaries are written by Ezel.