🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Federal agency decisions, searchable in plain English.

Workplace-safety cases from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) and mine-safety cases from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC), each with a plain-English summary, the standards it cites, and whether it counts as precedent. More agencies are coming.

5,577 decisions and counting · Latest decision July 17, 2026
7 decisions 29 C.F.R. § 1926.451(g)(2)

No decisions match these filters

Try a different search term or clear the filters.

ALJ

Excel Modular Scaffold & Leasing Company dba Excel Scaffold & Leasing

Skiff violation affirmed, anchorage item vacated

Excel employees erected hanging scaffolds a few inches above Galveston Bay, and one employee drowned after a scaffold component collapsed and pulled him underwater. The company stipulated that it lacked an immediately available lifesaving skiff, and the judge held that the violation was serious…

November 26, 2018 ·Sharon D. Calhoun
Mixed result
ALJ

Flintlock Construction Services LLC

Willful scaffold violations and $249,920 affirmed

OSHA found workers using inadequately planked, braced, accessed, and guarded scaffolds at a hotel construction project. Flintlock controlled the worksite and had authority to stop work, but its managers repeatedly ignored documented scaffold warnings from the onsite safety manager. The judge found…

July 6, 2016 ·Covette Rooney
Citations affirmed
ALJ

Anderson Masonry, Inc.

Scaffold access and locking-pin violations affirmed

Employees erecting Anderson Masonry's scaffold climbed cross bracing because no ladder or other safe access had been provided, and scaffold frames lacked locking pins despite repeated forklift deliveries that could cause uplift. Those serious violations were affirmed with penalties totaling $3,000…

May 21, 2003 ·Ken S. Welsch
Mixed result
COMM

Western Waterproofing Co., Inc.

Five suspension-scaffold items affirmed

Western Waterproofing employees sprayed a building from a two-point suspension scaffold supported by outrigger beams at heights up to 22 feet. The judge found that the outrigger supports lacked required bearing, anchorage, and bracing, and that the scaffold lacked a secondary tieback, safety belts…

March 17, 1977
Mixed result
COMM

Elmer Vath, Painting Contractor

Lifeline and fatality-reporting violations affirmed

Elmer Vath hired two painters to paint a building cornice from a two-point suspended scaffold and supplied the scaffold materials. One painter fell about 60 feet and died after a supporting beam slipped; he had removed his safety belt shortly before the incident. The judge found that the painter…

July 2, 1974
Mixed result
COMM

The Austin Co., Inc.

Scaffold and ladder violations affirmed

The Austin Company was constructing a hospital addition where two employees worked from a suspension scaffold without safety belts or lifelines. Two other employees worked on a 12-foot scaffold without guardrails. The judge treated those conditions as a serious violation and assessed $550. He…

July 1, 1974
Mixed result
COMM

Gilles & Cotting, Inc.

General contractor scaffold citation vacated

Gilles & Cotting was the general contractor on a construction project where a scaffold used and controlled by a glass subcontractor collapsed, killing two subcontractor employees. OSHA cited the general contractor under three scaffold standards because it controlled the jobsite and other…

October 9, 1973
Citations vacated

What these documents are

  • Commission decisions: Rulings by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission itself, the highest level of agency review. These are citable as Commission precedent, though a decision may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance.
  • ALJ decisions: Rulings by OSHRC Administrative Law Judges after a hearing. When no Commissioner directs review, an ALJ decision becomes a final order under 29 U.S.C. § 661(j): it binds the parties in that case but is not binding precedent in other cases.
  • Why finality matters: Every page here says which kind of decision you are reading, so you know whether it is precedent you can cite or a final order that only shows how one judge ruled on one set of facts.
  • Where they come from: Every page links the official OSHRC public release, and the full text on the page is that release. The plain-English summaries are written by Ezel.