🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Federal agency decisions, searchable in plain English.

Workplace-safety cases from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) and mine-safety cases from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC), each with a plain-English summary, the standards it cites, and whether it counts as precedent. More agencies are coming.

5,577 decisions and counting · Latest decision July 17, 2026
37 decisions 29 C.F.R. § 1926.350(a)(9)

No decisions match these filters

Try a different search term or clear the filters.

ALJ

E.C. Stokes Mechanical Contractor, Inc.

Misplaced citation did not excuse late contest

E.C. Stokes was installing plumbing and air-conditioning systems at a Florida hospital project when OSHA cited two serious oxygen and acetylene cylinder-storage violations. The proposed penalties totaled $4,760. An experienced office employee received the certified citation, scanned it, believed it…

September 17, 2012 ·Ken S. Welsch
Procedural
COMM

CB&I Constructors, Inc.

Gas-cylinder item withdrawn and fall item corrected to serious

The Commission reviewed a decision involving access, fall-protection, scaffold-platform, ladder, and compressed-gas-cylinder conditions during construction of a water tower. The Secretary withdrew the compressed-gas-cylinder item, and the Commission granted that withdrawal. It also corrected the…

January 31, 2003
Mixed result
COMM

Star Brite Construction Co., Inc.

Willful roof-edge violations and cylinder items affirmed

Star Brite replaced large low-pitched roofs at a New Jersey bus complex where employees worked near 25-foot-high unprotected edges and handled roofing materials at the roof edge. The Commission affirmed violations of the general built-up-roofing and roof-edge material-handling fall-protection…

December 20, 2001
Citations affirmed
ALJ

Big Apple Wrecking and Construction Corp.

Willful scaffold fall-protection citation affirmed at $56,000, most serious items upheld

Big Apple Wrecking & Construction is a New York City demolition contractor. In mid-1998 OSHA inspected its demolition of a six-story theater building, where crews worked on the top level of scaffolding surrounding the structure. OSHA issued a serious citation, a repeat citation, and a willful…

October 13, 2000 ·Irving Sommer
Mixed result
COMM

A. J. McNulty & Company, Inc.

Mixed ruling on fall protection during precast concrete erection

A. J. McNulty & Company was erecting a precast concrete parking garage in White Plains, New York, when OSHA cited numerous fall-protection and other safety violations. The Commission rejected McNulty's request to exclude inspection evidence, finding that OSHA substantially honored the company's…

October 5, 2000
Mixed result
ALJ

AIA Environmental

Unsecured-cylinder item affirmed, two items vacated

AIA Environmental performed interior demolition at an office building in Connecticut. OSHA found unsecured oxygen and acetylene cylinders, cited their close placement, and alleged that AIA did not make its written hazard-communication program available upon request. The judge affirmed the…

April 28, 2000 ·Covette Rooney
Mixed result
ALJ

LaForge & Budd Construction Co., Inc.

Two items affirmed by stipulation after remand

OSHA cited LaForge & Budd Construction Co., Inc. after inspecting an Oklahoma construction project. The Commission reversed an earlier ruling that had suppressed the inspection evidence and remanded the case for a hearing on the merits. The parties then stipulated that a nylon-sling item would be…

May 8, 1995 ·Stanley M. Schwartz
Mixed result
COMM

Dover Elevator Company

Unsecured-ladder item reduced to de minimis by settlement

Dover Elevator was an elevator subcontractor on a renovation project in New York City where OSHA issued serious, repeat, and other-than-serious citations. The Commission directed review only of an unsecured portable ladder item that the ALJ had affirmed as repeated with a $1,000 penalty. In a…

August 11, 1993
Modified
ALJ

Fluidics, Inc.

Mixed construction ruling assesses $13,600

Fluidics performed mechanical-system renovations at a Philadelphia public-housing project with unusually difficult site-security conditions. The judge affirmed serious violations involving unsecured and improperly separated compressed-gas cylinders, missing GFCI protection, exposed energized…

May 10, 1993 ·John H. Frye, III
Mixed result
COMM

Dover Elevator Company

Unsecured oxygen cylinder did not meet the carrying exception

Dover Elevator left an oxygen cylinder unsecured for 15 to 30 minutes near an elevator shaft while employees tried to repair a hoist. The Commission rejected OSHA's view that a cylinder must be secured whenever it is not physically moving, recognizing that brief, necessary pauses during carrying…

November 19, 1991
Modified
COMM

Shank-Ohbayashi

One tunnel docket severed, leaving $600 in penalties

Shank-Ohbayashi faced citations from two inspections of its Los Angeles Metro-Rail tunneling project. The cases were tried together, but Commission review was sought only for Docket 88-2674. The Commission severed Docket 88-1711 after finding no party or public interest that warranted further…

June 19, 1990
Procedural
COMM

Novak & Co., Inc.

Multi-employer worksite citations vacated

Novak, a plumbing subcontractor, was cited for allegedly inadequate overhead protection, improperly stored gas cylinders belonging to another contractor, unguarded floor perimeters, and an open floor hole. The Commission vacated every item. The Secretary did not prove that the entrance canopy was…

January 13, 1984
Citations vacated
COMM

Austin Building Company

Gas-cylinder item affirmed and fall-protection issue remanded

Austin employees welded near an unguarded edge on top of a precipitator where a fall could be nearly 80 feet. OSHA also found an acetylene cylinder ready for use and an oxygen cylinder lying unsecured on the floor. The Commission held that the compressed-gas rule requires cylinders to remain…

September 30, 1980
Mixed result
COMM

Daniel International Corp.

Pre-Barlow's inspection evidence remained admissible

OSHA inspected Daniel International's Missouri power-plant construction project in 1977 without a warrant, before the Supreme Court's 1978 decision in Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc. Daniel sought to suppress the inspection evidence, arguing that its project manager had not voluntarily consented and had…

March 26, 1980
Mixed result
COMM

Constructora Maza, Inc.

Construction violations and $4,455 penalties affirmed

Constructora Maza was building a three-building complex in Puerto Rico. OSHA cited missing stair railings, scaffolds supported by concrete blocks, a weakened scaffold plank, unguarded floor edges, unsecured compressed-gas cylinders, and improperly built ladder cleats. The Commission relied on…

December 15, 1977
Citations affirmed
COMM

Savina Home Industries, Inc.

Thirteen construction violations affirmed

At a retail-store construction site, the judge affirmed thirteen nonserious items involving missing hard hats, deficient mobile-scaffold rails, planking and bracing, frayed drill cords, an unapproved receptacle, a knotted winch cable, reversed wire-rope clips, a damaged ladder, a mushroomed…

January 3, 1977
Mixed result
COMM

State, Incorporated

Guardrail item upheld with increased penalty

State, Incorporated performed construction work at a steel plant where a furnace eruption killed two employees working above the operating area. The judge vacated OSHA's general duty clause citation because the evidence did not establish that the charging operation presented a recognized hazard…

October 21, 1976
Mixed result
COMM

A. Munder & Son, Inc. and Robert Catino, Inc.

Accessible hazards separated from remote conditions

A. Munder & Son was a sheet-metal subcontractor, and Robert Catino was a carpentry subcontractor, at a New York City building project. Both companies' employees passed near unsecured oxygen and acetylene cylinders that lacked valve caps, so the Commission affirmed the cylinder-storage violations…

August 17, 1976
Mixed result
COMM

David Neiss, d/b/a Neiss Engineering Company

Fall-hazard penalties reduced

Neiss Engineering was cited for 12 nonserious conditions at a concrete apartment-building project, including ladder defects, unguarded floor openings and platforms, housekeeping, unsecured gas cylinders, and other guarding issues. The judge affirmed the violations and adjusted the proposed…

May 19, 1976
Modified
COMM

Gumina Building & Construction Co.

Mixed construction-site ruling affirmed

Gumina was the general contractor on a college construction project where employees worked without hard hats, debris created tripping hazards, and oxygen cylinders were not secured upright. A separate eye-protection item was vacated because the evidence did not establish that safety glasses were…

April 28, 1976
Mixed result
COMM

Bechtel Power Corporation

Construction-manager safety violations affirmed

Bechtel managed construction of a Missouri power plant but did not perform craft labor. Its engineers, timekeepers, safety representatives, and other employees regularly worked throughout the construction site. The Commission held that this management and inspection work was directly tied to…

March 11, 1976
Citations affirmed
COMM

W. J. Barney Corporation

Direction for review vacated

The Commission vacated its direction for review in the W. J. Barney Corporation case by referring to Francisco Tower Service. The attached judge's decision concerned a construction manager whose employees regularly inspected and traversed a construction site. The judge found the company subject to…

February 18, 1976
Procedural
COMM

Alcap Electrical Corp.

Subcontractor citations affirmed for employee exposure

Alcap Electrical was an electrical subcontractor at a building project where employees encountered unguarded floor openings, unguarded stairs, unsecured gas cylinders, and other construction hazards. Alcap argued that it did not create or control the hazardous conditions. The Commission held that a…

May 15, 1975
Citations affirmed
COMM

Laster and Fingeret, Inc.

Penalties imposed for eight admitted construction violations

Laster and Fingeret was the general contractor at a building project and admitted three serious and five nonserious construction violations. The cited conditions included missing stair and perimeter railings, unguarded floor openings, fire-extinguisher and first-aid deficiencies, unsecured gas…

February 4, 1975
Modified
COMM

Peter Bratti Associates, Inc. & D'Adderio Construction Co., Inc.

Cylinder and fire-protection citations vacated

Bratti performed stonework and D'Adderio performed brickwork on a 15-story construction project where compressed-gas cylinders were found lying on their sides without valve caps. OSHA also alleged that required fire extinguishers were missing. The judge found insufficient evidence that either…

January 17, 1975
Citations vacated
COMM

Martin Iron Works, Inc.

Crane inspection violations added without penalties

Martin Iron Works used a crane beyond the manufacturer's rated lifting radius and capacity during structural steel erection at a Nevada casino project. The judge affirmed that serious violation for $850, along with an inadequate ladder for $55, unsecured gas cylinders for $55, and an improperly…

January 17, 1975
Mixed result
COMM

O'Dell Plumbing, Heating & Cooling, Inc.

Serious trenching violations affirmed

O'Dell Plumbing, Heating & Cooling was installing a storm drain at a hospital construction project in Liberty, Missouri. OSHA cited the company after employees worked in an approximately 14-foot-deep trench whose unstable sides were not adequately supported or sloped and whose spoil piles were…

November 1, 1974
Citations affirmed
COMM

H. K. Ferguson Co.

Seven construction violations affirmed and two vacated

H. K. Ferguson was the contractor on a project to expand an Anheuser-Busch facility in Columbus, Ohio. The judge affirmed seven nonserious items involving debris, flammable-liquid storage, smoking warnings, compressed-gas cylinders, elevated runways, and safe access between elevations. He vacated a…

October 11, 1974
Mixed result
COMM

Brown-Lane Company

Settlement vacates cylinder items and affirms scaffold penalties

Brown-Lane was constructing additional facilities for an affiliated open-pit clay mining operation in Louisiana. OSHA cited five conditions involving gas cylinders and scaffolding, with proposed penalties of $40 each for the two scaffold items. In a settlement, the Secretary agreed to vacate the…

October 3, 1974
Settled
COMM

Otis Elevator Company

Shared-site fire and cylinder violations partly affirmed

Otis Elevator employees worked at a construction site where fire protection was deficient and compressed-gas cylinders lacked valve caps or were not secured upright. Otis argued that it did not own the cylinders or control the fire equipment. The judge held that an employer remains responsible when…

September 24, 1974
Mixed result
COMM

Bayside Pipe Coaters, Inc.

Subcontractor remains responsible for its trench crew

Bayside Pipe Coaters sent a foreman and two employees to waterproof pipe in a trench excavated by a general contractor. The company admitted that the trench, spoil-pile, and compressed-gas-cylinder conditions violated OSHA standards but argued that its contract made the general contractor solely…

September 20, 1974
Citations affirmed
COMM

W. B. Meredith II, Inc.

One contested item affirmed and others vacated

W. B. Meredith II was a general construction contractor building a five-story reinforced concrete building. OSHA issued three serious and fourteen non-serious citation items with $1,750 in proposed penalties. The Commission upheld the judge's vacatur of the contested electrical-box, guardrail…

June 7, 1974
Mixed result
COMM

Hawkins Construction Co.

Excavation citation vacated for lack of employee exposure

Hawkins Construction was the general contractor on an industrial-park project and had excavated an area for sewer work. The excavation was not properly sloped and excavated material was stored too close to its edge, but only a subcontractor's employees were present when OSHA inspected. The…

May 20, 1974
Mixed result
COMM

H-E Lowdermilk Company

Backup observer and cylinder violations upheld

H-E Lowdermilk Company was building a Colorado highway when OSHA cited six construction-safety violations. The Commission found that trucks with obstructed rear views lacked alarms and were backed while bulldozer operators assigned as observers were not always free to watch and signal, so it…

April 16, 1974
Mixed result
COMM

Beall Construction Co.

Construction penalties reduced to $620

Beall Construction was the general contractor on a 12-story building project and faced serious, other-than-serious, and failure-to-abate allegations with proposed penalties totaling $35,442. The Commission adopted the judge's mixed disposition of the citations, including a serious violation for a…

February 21, 1974
Modified
COMM

Dore Wrecking Co.

Eye-protection item vacated and two penalties reduced

Dore Wrecking was demolishing a building with its own employees and specialized subcontractors. The Commission vacated an eye-protection item because the unprotected drill operator worked for a subcontractor, Dore did not control him, and no Dore employee was shown to be exposed to the condition…

January 24, 1974
Modified
COMM

Genco, Inc.

Construction citation vacated after inspection violations

OSHA issued Genco a 13-item non-serious citation after inspecting its construction work at Honolulu International Airport. The judge vacated the citation because the compliance officer began the inspection before presenting credentials to the owner, operator, or agent in charge as required by the…

October 12, 1973
Citations vacated

What these documents are

  • Commission decisions: Rulings by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission itself, the highest level of agency review. These are citable as Commission precedent, though a decision may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance.
  • ALJ decisions: Rulings by OSHRC Administrative Law Judges after a hearing. When no Commissioner directs review, an ALJ decision becomes a final order under 29 U.S.C. § 661(j): it binds the parties in that case but is not binding precedent in other cases.
  • Why finality matters: Every page here says which kind of decision you are reading, so you know whether it is precedent you can cite or a final order that only shows how one judge ruled on one set of facts.
  • Where they come from: Every page links the official OSHRC public release, and the full text on the page is that release. The plain-English summaries are written by Ezel.