🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Federal agency decisions, searchable in plain English.

Workplace-safety cases from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) and mine-safety cases from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC), each with a plain-English summary, the standards it cites, and whether it counts as precedent. More agencies are coming.

5,577 decisions and counting · Latest decision July 17, 2026
7 decisions 29 C.F.R. § 1926.251(b)(1)

No decisions match these filters

Try a different search term or clear the filters.

ALJ

Barlament Erection Crane Rentals

Crane tag, latch, and inspection items affirmed

Barlament used a truck-mounted crane to hoist bundled wooden roof trusses at a residential construction site. Its fabricated chain sling lacked the required capacity and manufacturer tag, the hoist hook's self-closing latch had been intentionally removed, and its monthly and annual inspection…

July 19, 2013 ·William S. Coleman
Mixed result
ALJ

B & B Underground Contractors

Excavation and gas-cylinder violations yield $8,000 penalty

B & B Underground Contractors operated a deep boring pit for a wastewater pipeline project in Alabama. The judge affirmed a serious violation for unsecured gas cylinders and found that the pit's only ramp was unsafe and more than 25 feet from employees' work area. Water was accumulating in the pit…

August 22, 2011 ·Sharon D. Calhoun
Mixed result
ALJ

D.T. Construction Company, Inc.

Three willful trench violations affirmed, most other items upheld, $119,750 penalty

D.T. Construction is a Pennsylvania contractor that installs underground water and sewer lines. After OSHA inspected several of its dig sites in 1998, the agency issued three citations covering willful, serious, and other-than-serious violations. The heart of the case was three willful cave-in…

October 19, 2000 ·Michael H. Schoenfeld
Mixed result
ALJ

Bruschi Brothers, Inc.

Most trenching citations affirmed, one vacated in sewer-line excavation case

Bruschi Brothers, Inc., a general contractor, was installing a sewer line in a roughly 13-to-15-foot-deep trench in Chicopee, Massachusetts, when OSHA inspected and found four employees working in it. OSHA issued several serious citations for failing to train workers on trenching and confined-space…

September 17, 1997 ·Robert A. Yetman
Mixed result
ALJ

Southern Forming, Inc.

Broad safety violations affirmed at $69,150

Southern Forming, also known as Suncrete Construction, performed concrete formwork at construction sites in Sunny Isles and Delray Beach, Florida. At the Sunny Isles site, an employee fell to his death from a stairway, and OSHA's investigation identified numerous fall-protection, stairway…

February 7, 1994 ·Paul L. Brady
Modified
COMM

Super Excavators, Inc.

Offsite hazard documents led to a de minimis notice and a $60 violation

Super Excavators had an effective written hazard-communication program, but kept the written program and material safety data sheets at its main office rather than at a sewer-construction worksite 22 miles away. The Commission converted the written-program item to a de minimis notice because the…

October 18, 1991
Modified
COMM

Boam Company

Identification rule applies to job-made chain slings

Boam Company used a job-made steel chain sling to lift pipe onto a truck. The sling broke, and the falling pipe fatally injured an employee. The judge vacated a citation alleging that the sling lacked identification for its size, grade, rated capacity, and manufacturer because he read the rule as…

October 31, 1980
Remanded

What these documents are

  • Commission decisions: Rulings by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission itself, the highest level of agency review. These are citable as Commission precedent, though a decision may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance.
  • ALJ decisions: Rulings by OSHRC Administrative Law Judges after a hearing. When no Commissioner directs review, an ALJ decision becomes a final order under 29 U.S.C. § 661(j): it binds the parties in that case but is not binding precedent in other cases.
  • Why finality matters: Every page here says which kind of decision you are reading, so you know whether it is precedent you can cite or a final order that only shows how one judge ruled on one set of facts.
  • Where they come from: Every page links the official OSHRC public release, and the full text on the page is that release. The plain-English summaries are written by Ezel.