🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Federal agency decisions, searchable in plain English.

Workplace-safety cases from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) and mine-safety cases from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC), each with a plain-English summary, the standards it cites, and whether it counts as precedent. More agencies are coming.

5,577 decisions and counting · Latest decision July 17, 2026
7 decisions 29 C.F.R. § 1910.23(a)(7)

No decisions match these filters

Try a different search term or clear the filters.

COMM

Calpine Corporation

Unguarded floor-opening citation affirmed

Calpine operated a power plant where a contractor removed platform grates during a turbine overhaul, leaving temporary floor openings more than 17 feet above a concrete floor. Calpine repeatedly assigned its maintenance employees to replace a turbine spark rod, a task that required access to the…

April 6, 2018
Citations affirmed
COMM

American Airlines, Inc.

FAA ground-operations manual does not preempt OSHA guardrail and hazard-communication citations after a fatal fall

American Airlines ran an aircraft maintenance and repair facility in Tulsa, Oklahoma. After a worker fell from the third story of a roughly 27-foot mobile "tail stand" work platform through unguarded floor openings to the ground and died, OSHA inspected and issued citations across two dockets…

February 23, 1996
Citations affirmed
ALJ

Well-Tech, Inc.

Removed platform guardrail and missing site records produced $2,850 in penalties

Well-Tech, Inc. was a well-servicing contractor replugging and sampling wells at a chemical plant in Barberton, Ohio. Employees removed an eight-foot section of guardrail from a 16-foot-high drilling platform and placed caution tape across the opening; within about 15 minutes, an employee fell…

September 22, 1995 ·Ken S. Welsch
Mixed result
COMM

Weatherby Engineering Company

Scaffold standard held unenforceable

The Commission reviewed the vacatur of a citation alleging that an elevated scaffold platform lacked guardrails and toeboards. It adhered to precedent holding that 29 C.F.R. § 1910.28(a)(3) was unenforceable because OSHA changed the source ANSI language from advisory “should” to mandatory “shall”…

February 10, 1981
Mixed result
COMM

Fort Hill Lumber Company

Three failure-to-abate items affirmed

Fort Hill Lumber received a failure-to-abate notice covering nine earlier sawmill violations with more than $16,000 in proposed additional penalties, plus a new lumber-carrier brake citation. On review, the Secretary withdrew five items for lack of proof, and the Commission also left other…

June 10, 1974
Mixed result
COMM

Milprint, Inc.

Fixed-stair item vacated for lack of proof

OSHA issued Milprint 13 non-serious citation items covering conditions at its Milwaukee plant. The judge affirmed nine items and vacated four, assessing penalties totaling $280. On review, the Commission reversed the fixed-stair item because OSHA did not prove that employees regularly used the…

October 18, 1973
Mixed result
COMM

American Motors Corporation

Welding-ventilation item vacated and $254 assessed

OSHA cited American Motors for 29 non-serious conditions at its Milwaukee automobile plant. After withdrawals, admissions, and a hearing, the administrative law judge affirmed 17 items, vacated 12, and assessed $279. Commission review focused on a welding station where no mechanical ventilation was…

July 2, 1973
Mixed result

What these documents are

  • Commission decisions: Rulings by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission itself, the highest level of agency review. These are citable as Commission precedent, though a decision may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance.
  • ALJ decisions: Rulings by OSHRC Administrative Law Judges after a hearing. When no Commissioner directs review, an ALJ decision becomes a final order under 29 U.S.C. § 661(j): it binds the parties in that case but is not binding precedent in other cases.
  • Why finality matters: Every page here says which kind of decision you are reading, so you know whether it is precedent you can cite or a final order that only shows how one judge ruled on one set of facts.
  • Where they come from: Every page links the official OSHRC public release, and the full text on the page is that release. The plain-English summaries are written by Ezel.