Federal agency decisions, searchable in plain English.
Workplace-safety cases from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) and mine-safety cases from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC), each with a plain-English summary, the standards it cites, and whether it counts as precedent. More agencies are coming.
No decisions match these filters
Try a different search term or clear the filters.
84 Components Company
Settlement set aside for lack of agreement on abatement
After a settlement was approved, 84 Components and the Secretary discovered that they did not agree on the acceptable method for abating a machine-guarding citation. The judge initially left the settlement in place and suggested that the parties use a failure-to-abate proceeding or a petition to…
84 Components Company
Settlement approval set aside for inquiry into disputed abatement
After the judge approved a settlement, 84 Components asserted that the parties had not agreed on how to abate one machine-guarding item. The Secretary did not oppose the company's request for relief. The Commission set aside the approval and remanded so the judge could investigate the disputed…
CRS Emergency Vehicles, Inc.
Saw-guard items affirmed, restart item vacated
CRS manufactured and upfitted security and safety vehicles at a plant on Osage tribal land in Oklahoma. Judge Stephen J. Simko, Jr. held that the Occupational Safety and Health Act applied because CRS was not tribally owned, sold products worldwide, and was engaged in commercial rather than purely…
L & B Products, Corp.
Fifty manufacturing safety items affirmed
L & B Products, Corp. manufactured furniture at a facility in Hudson, New York. OSHA issued 51 serious and other-than-serious items after inspecting eight departments. The allegations covered elevated work areas, exit signs, flammable liquids, fire and lockout training, machine and power-press…
Loomis Cabinet Company
Cabinet workers held to be employees
Loomis Cabinet Company manufactured wooden cabinets and was cited after a follow-up inspection for repeat, other-than-serious, and failure-to-abate violations. Loomis stipulated to the violations but argued that its former employees had become partners in Eastview Cabinet Company, leaving Loomis…
Harrison Furniture Manufacturing Company
Commission approves withdrawal of all citations
OSHA cited Harrison Furniture Manufacturing Company for numerous conditions at its Arkansas furniture plant after an inspection conducted under a warrant. The earlier litigation addressed whether evidence from a plant-wide inspection should be suppressed when the warrant application was based on…
Alamo Store Fixtures Corporation
Saw penalty reduced and wooden guards deemed de minimis
Alamo Store Fixtures manufactured wooden store fixtures with a radial saw whose lower blade was unguarded and three machines protected by plywood rather than the metal guards specified by the standard. The Commission rejected Alamo's argument that wood being cut made the radial-saw guard…
Building Products Company
Commission affirms the radial-saw lower-blade-guard charge and a total $150 penalty
Building Products Company manufactured wooden roof trusses using three radial saws whose employees had removed the lower blade guards. The company argued that the guards could eject wood chips during compound cuts and therefore created a separate hazard. The Commission held that the greater-hazard…
Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Proposed FRA rules do not displace OSHA
Union Pacific faced a failure-to-correct matter and citations involving machine guarding, woodworking equipment, respiratory protection, posting, and other conditions. It argued that an advance notice of proposed Federal Railroad Administration rulemaking exempted it from OSHA requirements. The…
Aluminum Coil Anodizing Corp.
Multi-item citation upheld in part after inspection challenge failed
OSHA inspected Aluminum Coil Anodizing's Illinois plant after receiving a complaint from someone who was not an employee or employee representative. The Commission held that the complaint's source and purpose did not invalidate the inspection because OSHA also had broad general authority to inspect…
Alliance Enclosures, Inc.
Machine-guarding decision affirmed without substantive Commission review
OSHA cited Alliance Enclosures for missing guards on a radial arm saw, a power brake, a power shear, and four power presses. The judge found that the saw had an adjustable travel stop and vacated that part of the first citation, but affirmed the missing blade guard and the point-of-operation…
Idaho Travertine Corporation
Most stone-processing citations affirmed with penalties reduced to $125
Idaho Travertine Corporation processed quarried stone at a small plant in Idaho Falls. OSHA issued one serious radial-saw citation and 13 nonserious items covering noise, personal protective equipment, machinery, compressed gas, emergency flushing, exits, and housekeeping. The judge affirmed the…
The House of Glass
Seven equipment and electrical items affirmed
The House of Glass operated a retail glass and glazing business in Great Falls, Montana. OSHA cited conditions involving a discharged fire extinguisher, a radial saw, an unguarded pulley, blocked electrical equipment, and three ungrounded appliances or machines. The Commission found the record…
S. E. Smith & Sons
Saw-guard violations affirmed with a reduced penalty
S. E. Smith & Sons contested five nonserious items and five serious machine-guarding items involving table and radial saws. The employer argued that each saw operator should decide whether to use the required safety devices. The judge rejected that position because compliance with the standards…
Weyerhaeuser Company
Sawmill citations largely reinstated
After two inspections of Weyerhaeuser’s Oregon lumber complex, the judge vacated most contested items. The Commission largely reversed. It affirmed excessive-noise subitems where even machinery-idling readings exceeded permissible levels for the employees’ work periods, while vacating subitems that…
Kennedy Houseboats, Inc.
Machine-guarding citation affirmed without penalties
Kennedy Houseboats contested point-of-operation guarding allegations involving double-angle saws, a Pexto shear, and the shear and punch on a Dvorak Iron Worker, while several other electrical and machine-guarding items remained contested only as to penalty. The judge found that employees’ hands…
Konkolville Lumber Co., Inc.
One saw item and one chain item upheld
OSHA cited Konkolville Lumber for saw guarding, mechanical power-transmission guarding, and fire-extinguisher conditions at its Idaho sawmill. In an earlier ruling included in this release, the Commission affirmed a serious radial-saw violation with a $100 penalty and left in place a nonserious…
Schultz Roof Truss, Inc.
Judge's decision affirmed without substantive review
The Commission affirmed the judge's decision because no party objected and the review order identified no compelling public-interest issue. Commissioner Moran agreed with affirming settled nonserious items but said he would vacate two litigated serious citations under the woodworking-machinery…
Diamond International Corp.
Guarding citations upheld with reduced penalties
OSHA cited Diamond International for unguarded power-transmission equipment, unguarded saw blades, and stairways without handrails at its Idaho sawmill. The judge found nine power-transmission guarding violations but reduced their classification from serious to nonserious because employee exposure…
Wood Products Company
Timely oral contest accepted and case remanded
Wood Products Company orally told OSHA within the 15-working-day deadline that it intended to contest its citation and proposed penalties. The owner had several contacts with the area director, did not initially understand that the notice had to be written, and mailed written confirmation within no…
Boise Cascade Corporation
Radial-saw guarding citation affirmed
Boise Cascade operated four radial saws at its Springfield, Virginia workplace without lower-blade guards that automatically adjusted to the stock being cut. The parties stipulated to those conditions, so the only disputed issue was whether the radial-saw guarding rule had been validly adopted as…
Northeast Marine Terminal Company
Seven terminal citation items vacated
OSHA observed powered-truck riders, poor housekeeping, gasoline leakage, ladder problems, and an unguarded radial saw at a Brooklyn marine terminal shared by two separate companies. The inspector initially assumed one company controlled the entire site and later divided the observed conditions…
Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc. and Blount Brothers Corporation, a Joint Venture
Superdome citations affirmed
The joint venture was general contractor for construction of the Louisiana Superdome, with about 350 employees and numerous subcontractors at the site. The Commission affirmed two serious citations and eighteen additional items covering perimeter and opening guards, personal protective equipment…
Hamilton Lumber Co.
Saw-guarding failures to correct affirmed
Hamilton Lumber operated cutoff and radial saws at its retail lumber yard. An uncontested citation required lower blade guards on the saws and required the radial saw cutting head to return gently to its starting position. A reinspection five days after the abatement date found that the three cited…
Stowe Canoe Company
Twenty-one safety items affirmed
Stowe Canoe operated a small Vermont canoe-manufacturing facility. OSHA cited 22 conditions involving machine guarding, eye protection, flammable-liquid handling, fire extinguishers, compressed air, electrical equipment, aisle marking, and injury-record posting. The judge affirmed the first 21…
Collator Corporation
Press-brake subitems vacated and remaining citation affirmed
Collator Corporation manufactured collating machines at a Seattle plant. Its notice of contest referred only to the proposed penalties, but its answer and statements at the hearing showed that it also intended to contest two press-brake guarding subitems. The Commission therefore treated those…
Brady-Hamilton Stevedore Company
Unguarded radial saw violation affirmed
Brady-Hamilton Stevedore operated a radial-arm saw without a guard over the lower exposed blade at its Portland, Oregon, gear locker. The judge vacated the citation after finding that the woodworking machinery standard was invalidly adopted from an ANSI standard. Relying on its earlier Noblecraft…
Thunderbird Coos Bay, Inc.
Saw guard and forklift-riding violations affirmed
Thunderbird Coos Bay used a radial-arm saw without a guard over the lower exposed blade. At the same worksite, two employees rode about 15 feet above the ground on loose lumber carried by a forklift. The Commission held that the saw-guarding standard was valid and that the exposed blade created a…
Juhr & Sons
Saw-guard citation reinstated and penalty reduced
Juhr & Sons, a general contractor, was cited after employees used a radial arm saw without a guard covering the lower portion of the blade. The employer admitted the violation and contested only the proposed $550 penalty. The administrative law judge nevertheless considered whether the guarding…
Continental Kitchens, Inc.
Woodworking saw-guard violations affirmed
Continental Kitchens manufactured kitchen cabinets using seven radial, swing cut-off, and hand-fed crosscut table saws that lacked required blade guards. The employer admitted the saws did not meet the guarding requirements but argued that guards could create a greater hazard by throwing small…
Madison Millwork Co.
Radial-saw violations reduced to nonserious
Madison Millwork operated two radial arm saws without guards covering the exposed sides of the lower blade and used compressed air for cleaning above 30 pounds per square inch. The Commission upheld the validity of the radial-saw guarding standard and affirmed the administrative law judge's…
Peregrine Industries, Inc.
Serious radial-saw guarding citation affirmed
Peregrine Industries operated radial saw equipment that did not comply with the lower-blade guarding standard. The Commission held that the standard was validly promulgated and that the violation was serious because contact could cause severe physical harm, including finger amputation. It also…
Boise Cascade Corporation
Serious radial-saw violation and $600 penalty affirmed
Boise Cascade's pulp and paper facility used a 16-inch radial arm saw whose lower blade was unguarded. Employees used the saw daily, their hands and bodies came within four to twelve inches of the blade, and the blade rotated at 3,600 revolutions per minute. The employer challenged the guarding…
Boise Cascade Corporation
Serious radial-saw guarding citation affirmed
Boise Cascade was cited for failing to guard the lower exposed portion of a radial-saw blade. The administrative law judge affirmed the citation as serious and assessed $250. The employer challenged the validity of the woodworking-machine standard. Relying on its Noblecraft decision, the Commission…
Johnson Brothers Planing Mill, Inc.
Millwork machine-guarding citations affirmed
Johnson Brothers manufactured wood products using radial and table saws, sanding equipment, belt-driven machinery, and electrical equipment with several cited guarding or grounding deficiencies. The serious citation involved unguarded lower portions of two radial-saw blades and an unguarded…
The Wirth Corporation
Serious radial-saw citation affirmed with reduced penalty
The Wirth Corporation operated a small millwork plant that primarily made studs for mobile homes. Two radial arm saws lacked guards over the lower exposed blade, although the employer had ordered guards months earlier and knew they had not arrived. The Commission upheld the validity of the guarding…
Shar Lo Homes
Nonserious radial-saw guarding violation affirmed
Shar Lo Homes was cited for failing to comply with the radial-saw lower-blade guarding standard. The administrative law judge classified the violation as nonserious and assessed $40. On review, the only identified issue was whether the cited standard had been validly promulgated. Applying its…
Noblecraft Industries, Inc.
Radial-saw guarding violation affirmed with reduced penalty
Noblecraft manufactured kitchen cabinets and used a radial-arm saw whose lower blade lacked the automatic guard required by 29 C.F.R. § 1910.213(h)(1). The judge had vacated the citation after concluding that the Secretary improperly adopted the rule from an ANSI standard without an advisory…
Idaho Travertine Corporation
Mine-safety jurisdiction dismissal reversed and case remanded
Idaho Travertine quarried large stone blocks at remote sites and transported them to an Idaho Falls plant for cutting, honing, polishing, and finishing. OSHA issued one serious citation and 12 nonserious citations with $1,290 in proposed penalties, but the judge vacated them because he placed the…
Terry Brothers
Radial-saw failure-to-abate penalty reduced to $250
Terry Brothers installed fences and wooden guards on two radial saws after OSHA cited inadequate lower-blade guarding. The added devices did not automatically adjust to the stock or cover the blade after a cut, so they did not satisfy the standard. The judge nevertheless found that the company had…
Allstate Trailer Sales, Inc.
Penalties reassessed after citations became final
Allstate Trailer Sales manufactured recreational vehicles at a Seattle plant. OSHA issued a serious citation involving unguarded saws and an eleven-item nonserious citation covering posting, recordkeeping, machine guarding, electrical grounding, and eye protection. Allstate's timely notice…
Hoffman Construction Co.
Radial-saw guard citation affirmed with reduced penalty
Hoffman Construction used a radial arm saw at the Trojan Nuclear Power construction project without a guard covering the full lower portion of the blade. The company argued that the installed replacement guard created binding, kickback, visibility, and flying-fragment hazards. The judge found that…
Irvington Moore, Division of U.S. Natural Resources, Inc.
Press-brake guarding violation reinstated
Irvington Moore manufactured sawmill machinery and used a press brake, an ironworker, and two saws at its Oregon plant. The Commission held that the general point-of-operation guarding standard applied to the press brake even though the specific mechanical power-press standard excluded press brakes…
Gem-Top MFG., Inc.
Press-brake and saw-guarding citations affirmed with reduced penalties
Gem-Top manufactured metal canopy tops for pickup trucks at its Clackamas, Oregon, plant. OSHA cited the company for operating a radial saw and swing cutoff saw without required guards and for operating two press brakes without point-of-operation guards. The Commission adopted the judge's ruling…
Pack River Lumber Co.
Saw-guarding violation classified as serious
Pack River Lumber operated two swing cutoff saws and one radial-arm saw without guards on the lower portions of their blades. It also had numerous unguarded gears, chains, belts, and pulleys that created pinch-point hazards throughout the workplace. The judge affirmed both violations as nonserious…
Robert J. Lzicar
Floor, saw, and electrical violations affirmed
Robert J. Lzicar performed carpentry, steel framing, and concrete work at a large construction project. Employees worked near the unguarded edge of a partially completed second floor 22 feet above the surface below, and two saws lacked required blade guards. The judge affirmed those three serious…
Patelos Industries, Ltd.
Radial-saw failure-to-abate penalty affirmed
Patelos manufactured doors and windows using five radial saws whose lower blade portions lacked automatic guards. After two abatement extensions, a reinspection found that the saws still were not properly guarded. The company had obtained three guards but removed them because they jammed during…
What these documents are
- Commission decisions: Rulings by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission itself, the highest level of agency review. These are citable as Commission precedent, though a decision may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance.
- ALJ decisions: Rulings by OSHRC Administrative Law Judges after a hearing. When no Commissioner directs review, an ALJ decision becomes a final order under 29 U.S.C. § 661(j): it binds the parties in that case but is not binding precedent in other cases.
- Why finality matters: Every page here says which kind of decision you are reading, so you know whether it is precedent you can cite or a final order that only shows how one judge ruled on one set of facts.
- Where they come from: Every page links the official OSHRC public release, and the full text on the page is that release. The plain-English summaries are written by Ezel.