🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Federal agency decisions, searchable in plain English.

Workplace-safety cases from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) and mine-safety cases from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC), each with a plain-English summary, the standards it cites, and whether it counts as precedent. More agencies are coming.

5,577 decisions and counting · Latest decision July 17, 2026
4 decisions 29 C.F.R. § 1910.212(a)(3)(iii)

No decisions match these filters

Try a different search term or clear the filters.

ALJ

H-E-B, LP

Meat-saw hand-tool citation vacated under plain text of standard

An H-E-B employee suffered a substantial hand laceration while cutting a shoulder roast on a meat-cutting band saw. OSHA issued a willful citation alleging that H-E-B failed to provide a special hand tool that would keep employees' hands outside the danger zone. On cross-motions for summary…

March 8, 2021 ·Patrick B. Augustine
Citations vacated
COMM

Pass and Seymour, Inc.

Molding-machine guarding violation affirmed

Pass and Seymour operated 24 automatic molding machines whose heated dies closed under high pressure. Employees could reach between the dies while open or through side openings during the operating cycle, particularly while clearing a malfunction. The company relied on training, warning plates…

November 29, 1979
Citations affirmed
COMM

Union Pacific Railroad Co.

Proposed FRA rules do not displace OSHA

Union Pacific faced a failure-to-correct matter and citations involving machine guarding, woodworking equipment, respiratory protection, posting, and other conditions. It argued that an advance notice of proposed Federal Railroad Administration rulemaking exempted it from OSHA requirements. The…

August 1, 1977
Citations affirmed
COMM

Mikel Company, Inc.

Machine-guarding items affirmed in part and penalties reduced

Mikel Company manufactured high-style furniture using saws, routers, a jointer, and a root shaper. The judge vacated the root-shaper item because the evidence showed a hold-down guard was installed, but affirmed jointer and router guarding violations with penalties of $30 and $35. Four saw-guarding…

March 17, 1977
Mixed result

What these documents are

  • Commission decisions: Rulings by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission itself, the highest level of agency review. These are citable as Commission precedent, though a decision may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance.
  • ALJ decisions: Rulings by OSHRC Administrative Law Judges after a hearing. When no Commissioner directs review, an ALJ decision becomes a final order under 29 U.S.C. § 661(j): it binds the parties in that case but is not binding precedent in other cases.
  • Why finality matters: Every page here says which kind of decision you are reading, so you know whether it is precedent you can cite or a final order that only shows how one judge ruled on one set of facts.
  • Where they come from: Every page links the official OSHRC public release, and the full text on the page is that release. The plain-English summaries are written by Ezel.