🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Federal agency decisions, searchable in plain English.

Workplace-safety cases from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) and mine-safety cases from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC), each with a plain-English summary, the standards it cites, and whether it counts as precedent. More agencies are coming.

5,577 decisions and counting · Latest decision July 17, 2026
12 decisions 29 C.F.R. § 1910.157(a)(3)

No decisions match these filters

Try a different search term or clear the filters.

COMM

Chicago and North Western Transportation Co.

Railroad coverage upheld and four items affirmed

Chicago and North Western Transportation challenged a seven-item citation at its railroad facility in Boone, Iowa. The Commission rejected the company's claim that the railroad industry was exempt from OSHA jurisdiction because the Federal Railroad Administration had not exercised authority over…

March 10, 1977
Mixed result
COMM

Savina Home Industries, Inc.

Failure-to-abate notification vacated

Savina received a failure-to-abate notification after a follow-up inspection concerning an injury log, first-aid training, and a welding hood hanging on a fire extinguisher. The Commission explained that a prima facie failure-to-abate case requires a final original citation and the identical…

January 6, 1977
Citations vacated
COMM

American Bag Co., Inc.

Failure-to-abate penalties reduced

American Bag was a 17-employee leather bag manufacturer in Puerto Rico. After the company did not contest an initial citation, OSHA reinspected and alleged that multiple violations had not been corrected, that the citation had not been posted, and that an injury log had not been maintained. The…

April 6, 1976
Modified
COMM

Collator Corporation

Press-brake subitems vacated and remaining citation affirmed

Collator Corporation manufactured collating machines at a Seattle plant. Its notice of contest referred only to the proposed penalties, but its answer and statements at the hearing showed that it also intended to contest two press-brake guarding subitems. The Commission therefore treated those…

February 25, 1976
Mixed result
COMM

Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co.; Winston-Salem Southbound Railway Co.

Railroad safety citations affirmed

Seaboard Coast Line admitted three nonserious safety violations, and Winston-Salem Southbound was cited because employees used a stationary caboose office without a fire extinguisher reliably available within 50 feet. Both railroads argued that Federal Railroad Administration authority exempted the…

December 1, 1975
Citations affirmed
COMM

Railroad Salvage of Connecticut, Inc.

Failure-to-abate items affirmed and penalties reduced

Railroad Salvage did not contest an original citation covering blocked egress, poorly identified and mounted fire extinguishers, and hazardous material stacking, so those violations became final. A reinspection found that some cited locations remained uncorrected. The judge affirmed four…

June 26, 1975
Modified
COMM

Irvington Moore, Division of U.S. Natural Resources, Inc.

Press-brake guarding violation reinstated

Irvington Moore manufactured sawmill machinery and used a press brake, an ironworker, and two saws at its Oregon plant. The Commission held that the general point-of-operation guarding standard applied to the press brake even though the specific mechanical power-press standard excluded press brakes…

April 7, 1975
Mixed result
COMM

Union Pacific Railroad Company

Railroad office fire-safety items affirmed

OSHA cited Union Pacific's Pocatello yard office for using unsuitable fire protection around energized equipment, failing to mark exits and misleading doors, and obscuring a carbon-dioxide extinguisher behind a partition. The railroad did not rebut the conditions but argued that Federal Railroad…

November 26, 1974
Citations affirmed
COMM

St. Paul Feed & Supply, Inc.

Penalty-only contest leaves citations final

St. Paul Feed & Supply received one serious and 17 nonserious citation items at its Oregon agricultural-products facility. Its notice of contest identified only the proposed penalties. The Commission held that this limited notice left the citations and their abatement periods as final orders, so…

October 2, 1974
Modified
COMM

York Metal Finishing Company

Two failure-to-abate items upheld

York Metal Finishing, an electroplating company, did not contest an original four-item citation and paid $59 in penalties. After reinspection, OSHA alleged that all four conditions remained and proposed $1,058 in additional failure-to-abate penalties. The Commission held that OSHA establishes a…

April 8, 1974
Mixed result
COMM

Fineberg Packing Company, Inc.

OSHA sanitation item reinstated despite USDA rules

Fineberg Packing, a meat processor, received a nine-item nonserious citation covering electrical, exit, fire-protection, housekeeping, sanitation, and ladder conditions. The judge vacated the sanitation item because Department of Agriculture rules under the Wholesome Meat Act also regulated plant…

March 22, 1974
Mixed result
COMM

Stevens Equipment Co.

Old power-press guarding item vacated

Stevens Equipment fabricated and sold metal products at an Oregon plant. OSHA cited an unguarded mechanical power press and an unguarded chain-and-sprocket drive as serious, along with eight other conditions that the company admitted. The Commission agreed that the press lacked a point-of-operation…

April 27, 1973
Mixed result

What these documents are

  • Commission decisions: Rulings by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission itself, the highest level of agency review. These are citable as Commission precedent, though a decision may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance.
  • ALJ decisions: Rulings by OSHRC Administrative Law Judges after a hearing. When no Commissioner directs review, an ALJ decision becomes a final order under 29 U.S.C. § 661(j): it binds the parties in that case but is not binding precedent in other cases.
  • Why finality matters: Every page here says which kind of decision you are reading, so you know whether it is precedent you can cite or a final order that only shows how one judge ruled on one set of facts.
  • Where they come from: Every page links the official OSHRC public release, and the full text on the page is that release. The plain-English summaries are written by Ezel.